Weltman J Y, Veldhuis J D, Weltman A, Kerrigan J R, Evans W S, Rogol A D
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990 Dec;71(6):1646-52. doi: 10.1210/jcem-71-6-1646.
The test-retest reliability of estimates of pulsatile LH and GH release was evaluated in 23 eumenorrheic women during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Each subject was studied during two successive or near-successive menstrual cycles by repetitive blood sampling every 10 min for 24 h. Pulsatile parameters for LH and GH release were identified and characterized using the Cluster pulse detection algorithm. For LH, no significant differences existed in any parameter mean between the two 24-h admissions. Correlation coefficients for consecutive 24-h studies ranged from r = 0.22 (P less than 0.32) for number of LH peaks to r = 0.79 (P less than 0.0001) for 24-h integrated LH values (area under the concentration vs. time curve). No significant mean differences in any parameter were observed for consecutive 24-h GH evaluations. Correlation coefficients for 24-h GH ranged from r = 0.25 (P less than 0.34) for nadir to r = 0.71 (P less than 0.002) for incremental peak increase. Cosinor analysis was used to determine significant 24-h variations in LH and GH concentrations. Statistically significant differences existed between admissions for the amplitude of the nyctohemeral LH rhythm and its acrophase (time at which maximal hormone value was attained), but no mean differences were found for mesor (mean concentration). Correlation coefficients for LH were r = 0.10 (P less than 0.65), r = 0.43 (P less than 0.08), and r = 0.78 (P less than 0.0001) for phase, amplitude, and mesor, respectively. No significant mean differences existed for any parameter of nyctohemeral GH rhythms. Correlation coefficients were r = -0.18 (P less than 0.52), r = 0.49 (P less than 0.72), and r = 0.14 (P less than 0.80) for 24-h GH amplitude, phase, and mesor, respectively. We conclude that comparisons of mean and integrated LH and GH concentrations over a 24-h interval in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle are reliable; however, certain pulsatile properties responsible for the achievement of the mean daily concentrations of LH and GH may be nonuniform from menstrual cycle to menstrual cycle. In addition, nonuniformities may exist in the nyctohemeral rhythms of serum concentrations of LH and GH in the adult woman between cycles when a single 24-h time series is the basis for the analysis.
在23名月经周期正常的女性卵泡期早期,评估了促黄体生成素(LH)和生长激素(GH)脉冲式释放估计值的重测信度。在两个连续或接近连续的月经周期中,对每位受试者进行研究,每10分钟重复采血一次,共24小时。使用聚类脉冲检测算法识别并描述LH和GH释放的脉冲参数。对于LH,两次24小时采血期间任何参数均值均无显著差异。连续24小时研究的相关系数范围为:LH峰值数量的r = 0.22(P < 0.32)至24小时LH积分值(浓度与时间曲线下面积)的r = 0.79(P < 0.0001)。连续24小时GH评估中,任何参数均未观察到显著的均值差异。24小时GH的相关系数范围为:最低点的r = 0.25(P < 0.34)至增量峰值增加的r = 0.71(P < 0.002)。采用余弦分析确定LH和GH浓度的24小时显著变化。两次采血间,昼夜LH节律的振幅及其峰相位(达到最大激素值的时间)存在统计学显著差异,但均数(平均浓度)无差异。LH的相位、振幅和均数的相关系数分别为r = 0.10(P < 0.65)、r = 0.43(P < 0.08)和r = 0.78(P < 0.0001)。昼夜GH节律的任何参数均未观察到显著的均值差异。24小时GH振幅、相位和均数的相关系数分别为r = -0.18(P < 0.52)、r = 0.49(P < 0.72)和r = 0.14(P < 0.80)。我们得出结论,月经周期卵泡期早期24小时内LH和GH平均浓度及积分浓度的比较是可靠的;然而,导致LH和GH每日平均浓度形成的某些脉冲特性在月经周期之间可能不一致。此外,当以单个24小时时间序列为分析基础时,成年女性不同周期间LH和GH血清浓度的昼夜节律可能存在不一致性。