School of Public Policy, 3401 Fairfax Drive, George Mason University, Arlington, VA 22201, USA.
Addiction. 2012 Aug;107(8):1462-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03831.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
To determine the impact of standard care and contingency management treatments on the utilization of general health-care services by substance abusers. PARTICIPANTS, DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: This secondary analysis pooled 1028 treatment-seeking substance abusers from five randomized clinical trials that compared the effects of standard care (SC, n = 362) to standard care plus contingency management (CM, n = 666). In each trial, subjects in the CM condition showed significantly greater reductions in substance use than their SC counterparts. For each subject, utilization of 15 general health-care services was measured 1 year prior to treatment intake and up to 9 months following treatment intake. Post-intake utilization data were pro-rated to be comparable to the 1-year pre-intake data. Paired t-tests evaluated changes in service utilization pre- and post-intake, and difference-in-differences regression models were used to estimate the impact of CM, compared to SC, on changes in the utilization of each of the 15 health services.
Out-patient community substance abuse clinics in Connecticut and Massachusetts, USA.
Utilization of several types of out-patient services increased significantly between the pre- and post-intake periods [e.g. dental visits (0.47, P < 0.001), community health center visits (0.50, P < 0.001), visits to a mental health professional office (1.03, P = 0.001)], while in-patient hospital care for mental health problems decreased significantly (-3.50 nights, P < 0.001). A substantial portion of these changes occurred during the treatment period. No significant differences were found between the two treatment conditions.
Initiating out-patient substance abuse treatment is associated with changes in general health-care service utilization, independent of the type of treatment offered.
确定标准护理和应急管理治疗对物质滥用者一般医疗保健服务利用的影响。
参与者、设计和测量:本二次分析汇集了来自五项随机临床试验的 1028 名寻求治疗的物质滥用者,这些试验比较了标准护理(SC,n=362)与标准护理加应急管理(CM,n=666)的效果。在每项试验中,CM 组的受试者在物质使用方面的减少明显大于 SC 组。对于每个受试者,在治疗开始前 1 年和治疗开始后 9 个月内测量了 15 种一般医疗保健服务的利用情况。治疗开始后的数据按比例分配,以与治疗开始前 1 年的数据相比较。配对 t 检验评估了治疗开始前后服务利用的变化,差异差异回归模型用于估计与 SC 相比,CM 对 15 种健康服务中每种服务利用变化的影响。
美国康涅狄格州和马萨诸塞州的门诊社区物质滥用诊所。
在治疗开始前后期间,几种类型的门诊服务的利用显著增加[例如,牙科就诊(0.47,P<0.001),社区卫生中心就诊(0.50,P<0.001),精神卫生专业办公室就诊(1.03,P=0.001)],而心理健康问题的住院治疗显著减少(-3.50 晚,P<0.001)。这些变化的很大一部分发生在治疗期间。两种治疗条件之间没有发现显著差异。
启动门诊物质滥用治疗与一般医疗保健服务利用的变化相关,而与所提供的治疗类型无关。