Sulaiman Suhaina, Shahril Mohd Razif, Shaharudin Soraya Hanie, Emran Nor Aina, Muhammad Rohaizak, Ismail Fuad, Husain Sharifah Noor Akmal Syed
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Malaysia.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(9):2167-78.
Fat intake has been shown to play a role in the etiology of breast cancer, but the findings have been inconsistent.
To assess the association of premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer risk with fat and fat subtypes intake.
This is a population based case-control study conducted in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from January 2006 to December 2007. Food intake pattern was collected from 382 breast cancer patients and 382 control group via an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a broad range of potential confounders was included in analysis.
This study showed that both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer risk did not increase significantly with greater intake of total fat [quartile (Q) 4 versus Q1 OR=0.76, 95% CI, 0.23-2.45 and OR=1.36, 95% CI, 0.30-3.12], saturated fat (ORQ4 to Q1=1.43, 95% CI, 0.51-3.98 and ORQ4 to Q1=1.75, 95% CI, 0.62-3.40), monounsaturated fat (ORQ4 to Q1=0.96, 95% CI, 0.34-1.72 and ORQ4 to Q1=1.74, 95% CI, 0.22-2.79), polyunsaturated fat (ORQ4 to Q1=0.64, 95% CI, 0.23-1.73 and ORQ4 to Q1=0.74, 95% CI, 0.39-1.81), n-3 polyunsaturated fat (ORQ4 to Q1=1.10, 95% CI, 0.49-2.48 and ORQ4 to Q1=0.78, 95% CI, 0.28-2.18), n-6 polyunsaturated fat (ORQ4 to Q1=0.67, 95% CI, 0.24-1.84 and ORQ4 to Q1=0.71, 95% CI, 0.29-1.04) or energy intake (ORQ4 to Q1=1.52, 95% CI, 0.68-3.38 and ORQ4 to Q1=2.21, 95% CI, 0.93-3.36).
Total fat and fat subtypes were not associated with pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer risk after controlling for age, other breast cancer risk factors and energy intake. Despite the lack of association, the effects of total fat and fat subtypes intake during premenopausal years towards postmenopausal breast cancer risk still warrant investigation.
脂肪摄入已被证明在乳腺癌病因中起作用,但研究结果并不一致。
评估绝经前和绝经后乳腺癌风险与脂肪及脂肪亚型摄入之间的关联。
这是一项基于人群的病例对照研究,于2006年1月至2007年12月在马来西亚吉隆坡进行。通过访谈员实施的食物频率问卷收集了382例乳腺癌患者和382例对照组的食物摄入模式。采用逻辑回归计算比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI),分析中纳入了广泛的潜在混杂因素。
本研究表明,绝经前和绝经后乳腺癌风险均不会随着总脂肪摄入量增加而显著升高[四分位数(Q)4与Q1相比,OR = 0.76,95%CI为0.23 - 2.45;OR = 1.36,95%CI为0.30 - 3.12],饱和脂肪(ORQ4至Q1 = 1.43,95%CI为0.51 - 3.98;ORQ4至Q1 = 1.75,95%CI为0.62 - 3.40),单不饱和脂肪(ORQ4至Q1 = 0.96,95%CI为0.34 - 1.72;ORQ4至Q1 = 1.74,95%CI为0.22 - 2.79),多不饱和脂肪(ORQ4至Q1 = 0.64,95%CI为0.23 - 1.73;ORQ4至Q1 = 0.74,95%CI为0.39 - 1.81),n - 3多不饱和脂肪(ORQ4至Q1 = 1.10,95%CI为0.49 - 2.48;ORQ4至Q1 = 0.78,95%CI为0.28 - 2.18),n - 6多不饱和脂肪(ORQ4至Q1 = 0.67,95%CI为0.24 - 1.84;ORQ4至Q1 = 0.71,95%CI为0.29 - 1.04)或能量摄入(ORQ4至Q1 = 1.52,95%CI为0.68 - 3.38;ORQ4至Q1 = 2.21,95%CI为0.93 - 3.36)而升高。
在控制年龄、其他乳腺癌风险因素和能量摄入后,总脂肪及脂肪亚型与绝经前和绝经后乳腺癌风险无关。尽管缺乏关联,但绝经前几年总脂肪及脂肪亚型摄入对绝经后乳腺癌风险的影响仍值得研究。