• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Setting research priorities to reduce burden of cancer in Iran: an institutional experience.

作者信息

Abachizadeh Kambiz, Mohagheghi Mohammad-Ali, Mosavi-Jarrahi Alireza

机构信息

Dept. of Public Health and Social Medicine, Medical School, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(9):2365-70.

PMID:22296385
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to draw a set of priority areas of cancer research in order to utilize these priorities as broader policy for decision-making on a comprehensive cancer control program at the national level in Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A steering committee consisting of scientists from the three major areas of clinical, basic research and public health sciences recommended a qualitative study of ranking an exhaustive outlines of cancer science topics by cancer scientists throughout country. Scientists were identified through Medline search and contacting cancer research centers all over the country. An exhausting outline of cancer science topics was modified and posed to Iranian cancer scientists. Doing research on each outlined topic was judged based on its state of being necessary, appropriate, practical or yielding in the Iranian societal context. An electronic system of communication was developed and all scientists were asked to rank each topic based in order of 1 to 5. As the areas of expertise of scientists were diverse, the participants had the option to rank the outlined topics that they think suitable to their areas.

RESULTS

Out of 135 identified scientists, 108 participated of whom 56 were clinicians (M.D's with university appointment), 35 basic scientists and 17 epidemiologists and public health scientists. As the top first five areas of research priorities, the overall assessment indicated as research topics: 1) cancer surveillance and registration as the first priority; followed by 2) exogenous factors in the origin and cause of cancer; 3) surveillance--patient care and survivorship issues; 4) issues of end-of-life care; and 5) cost analyses and health care delivery of cancer services.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that research on infrastructure of cancer control programs, cancer registration, service delivery and patient quality of life bears higher priority in Iran.

摘要

相似文献

1
Setting research priorities to reduce burden of cancer in Iran: an institutional experience.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(9):2365-70.
2
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
3
Breast cancer research gaps: a questionnaire-based study to determine overall priorities and compare the priorities of patients, the public, clinicians and scientists.乳腺癌研究差距:一项基于问卷的研究,旨在确定总体优先事项,并比较患者、公众、临床医生和科学家的优先事项。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 28;14(8):e084573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084573.
4
Priority setting and implementation in a centralized health system: a case study of Kerman province in Iran.集中式卫生系统中的优先事项设定与实施:以伊朗克尔曼省为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Aug;28(5):480-94. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs082. Epub 2012 Sep 22.
5
Diseases and Health Outcomes Registry Systems in I.R. Iran: Successful Initiative to Improve Public Health Programs, Quality of Care, and Biomedical Research.伊朗伊斯兰共和国的疾病与健康结果登记系统:改善公共卫生项目、医疗质量和生物医学研究的成功举措。
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 1;20(11):696-703.
6
Patient and provider priorities for cancer prevention and control: a qualitative study in Mid-Atlantic Latinos.癌症预防与控制中患者和医疗服务提供者的优先事项:对大西洋中部拉丁裔的定性研究
Ethn Dis. 2002 Summer;12(3):383-91.
7
Health policy and systems research agendas in developing countries.发展中国家的卫生政策与系统研究议程
Health Res Policy Syst. 2004 Aug 5;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-2-6.
8
Coping, family and mastery: top priorities for social science research by patients with chronic kidney disease.应对方式、家庭和掌控感:慢性肾脏病患者社会科学研究的重中之重。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Oct;26(10):3189-95. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq833. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
9
A model for HTA priority setting: experience in Lithuania.卫生技术评估优先事项设定模型:立陶宛的经验
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):450-5. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000470.
10
EUROCOURSE lessons learned from and for population-based cancer registries in Europe and their programme owners: Improving performance by research programming for public health and clinical evaluation.欧洲课程:欧洲基于人群的癌症登记处及其项目负责人的经验教训:通过公共卫生和临床评估的研究规划提高绩效。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jun;51(9):997-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Priority-setting in health research in Iran: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitators.伊朗卫生研究中的优先事项设定:一项关于障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 2;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0313-1.
2
Productivity costs and years of potential life lost associated with five leading causes of death: Evidence from Iran (2006-2010).与五大主要死因相关的生产力成本及潜在生命损失年数:来自伊朗的证据(2006 - 2010年)
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Sep 7;30:412. eCollection 2016.