Yost W A
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Sep;78(3):901-7. doi: 10.1121/1.392920.
Signal detection in diotic (NoSo) and dichotic (NoS pi) conditions was measured as a function of the stimulus parameters of the noise that preceded the signal-plus-masker. When the signal and masker were both pulsed, dichotic signal detection was worse than when the masker was continuous or when the onset of the masker preceded the signal-plus-masker by at least 500 ms. The dichotic detection thresholds decreased as the duration of the pulsed signal plus pulsed masker was increased. The level, spectrum, interaural configuration, duration, and temporal proximity of the prior noise (forward fringe) relative to the masker and/or signal and masker were all investigated. Almost any difference between the parameters of the fringe and the masker resulted in poorer signal detection in the dichotic conditions. These same stimulus conditions produced small (less than 2.2 dB) changes in the diotic detection thresholds. The various models of the Masking-Level Difference (MLD) may be modified to qualitatively describe some of these results.
在双耳(NoSo)和双听(NoS pi)条件下,信号检测是作为信号加掩蔽器之前噪声的刺激参数的函数来测量的。当信号和掩蔽器均为脉冲式时,双听信号检测比掩蔽器为连续式时或掩蔽器的起始时间比信号加掩蔽器提前至少500毫秒时更差。随着脉冲信号加脉冲掩蔽器的持续时间增加,双听检测阈值降低。相对于掩蔽器和/或信号与掩蔽器,先前噪声(前向边缘)的电平、频谱、双耳配置、持续时间和时间接近度均被研究。边缘和掩蔽器参数之间几乎任何差异都会导致双听条件下信号检测变差。这些相同的刺激条件在双耳检测阈值中产生了微小(小于2.2分贝)的变化。掩蔽级差(MLD)的各种模型可能需要修改,以便定性地描述其中一些结果。