Institute of Clinical Medicine Vinderen, University of Oslo, Norway.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):297-307. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1770. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
On the basis of the well-established association between early alliance and outcome, this exploratory study investigated the associations between the therapeutic alliance and long-term outcome, 3 years after treatment termination. In addition to the early alliance, pre-treatment patient characteristics and expectancies that were significantly related to early alliance were included in the statistical analyses. The data are from the First Experimental Study of Transference, a dismantling randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up. One hundred out-patients who sought psychotherapy due to depression, anxiety and personality disorders were treated. Alliance was measured with Working Alliance Inventory after session 7. Change was determined using linear mixed model analyses. The alliance alone had a significant impact on long-term outcome of the predetermined primary outcome variables of the study: Psychodynamic Functioning Scales and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Contrary to common clinical wisdom, when the pre-treatment patient variables were included, more personality disorder pathology was the strongest predictor of favourable outcome, over and above the effect of the alliance, which was no longer significant. Clinical implications are discussed.
基于早期联盟与结果之间已确立的关联,本探索性研究调查了治疗结束后 3 年时治疗联盟与长期结果之间的关联。除了早期联盟外,还将与早期联盟显著相关的治疗前患者特征和期望纳入统计分析。数据来自转移的第一次实验研究,这是一项具有长期随访的拆解随机临床试验。由于抑郁、焦虑和人格障碍而寻求心理治疗的 100 名门诊患者接受了治疗。在第 7 次治疗后使用工作联盟量表来测量联盟。使用线性混合模型分析来确定变化。联盟本身对研究预定的主要结果变量的长期结果有显著影响:心理动力功能量表和人际问题清单。与普遍的临床观念相反,当包括治疗前的患者变量时,更严重的人格障碍病理是有利结果的最强预测因素,超过了联盟的影响,而联盟的影响不再显著。讨论了临床意义。