• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化种植体定位器在工作模型上的定位:非接触式扫描仪和接触式探头扫描仪的比较。

Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner.

机构信息

University Clinic Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):29-35.

PMID:22299075
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although several investigations of the fit of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufactured implant restorations have been reported in the literature, very limited information is available on the accuracy of dental scanners for surface data acquisition. The objective of this research project was to investigate the accuracy and repeatability of a three-dimensional noncontact laser scanning system based on conoscopic holography recording the spatial orientation of an implant in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One master cast containing five nonparallel implant replicas with scan abutments (implant position locator [IPL], Nobel Biocare) was repeatedly digitized by two commercially available dental scanners and an industrial highprecision coordinate measuring machine as a reference. Repeated measurements of the center point and vector analysis were applied to determine the accuracy and repeatability of IPL orientation. The Wilcoxon signed rank test modified for equivalence was applied to determine whether the systems were equally accurate based on given threshold limits of 0.010, 0.005, and 0.001 mm.

RESULTS

All between-system tests identified significant differences, although most differences were very small in absolute terms. Tests for equivalence based on difference windows were exploratorily significant for 0.010 and 0.005 mm.

CONCLUSION

Conoscopic holography scan technology is a valid option to supplement dental touch-probe scanners for laboratory digitization of implant master casts.

摘要

目的

尽管文献中已经报道了许多关于计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造植入物修复体拟合的研究,但关于用于表面数据采集的牙科扫描仪的准确性的信息非常有限。本研究项目的目的是研究基于相衬全息记录空间取向的三维非接触激光扫描系统在体外植入物的准确性和可重复性。

材料和方法

一个包含五个非平行植入物复制品和扫描接杆(植入物位置定位器[IPL],Nobel Biocare)的主模型被两个商业上可用的牙科扫描仪和一个工业高精度坐标测量机重复数字化作为参考。中心点的重复测量和向量分析被应用于确定 IPL 方向的准确性和可重复性。基于给定的 0.010、0.005 和 0.001 毫米的阈值限制,应用了等效性修正的 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验来确定系统是否具有相同的准确性。

结果

所有的系统间测试都确定了显著的差异,尽管大多数差异在绝对值上非常小。基于差异窗口的等效性测试对于 0.010 和 0.005 毫米是探索性显著的。

结论

相衬全息扫描技术是一种有效的选择,可以补充牙科触针扫描仪,用于植入物主模型的实验室数字化。

相似文献

1
Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner.数字化种植体定位器在工作模型上的定位:非接触式扫描仪和接触式探头扫描仪的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):29-35.
2
Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study.CAD/CAM 和铸造种植体框架中的体积不匹配:大学实验室研究。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Jun;20(4):267-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00709.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
3
A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.激光扫描仪和接触式探头扫描仪的三维评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Mar;95(3):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.003.
4
Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.用于多个种植体基台印模的三种技术的准确性评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):186-92. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.15.
5
In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements.体外测量种植体支持的修复体的精度。使用两种不同测量技术对“虚拟”和“物理”拟合评估进行比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e175-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00416.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.使用光学扫描和锥形束CT技术进行种植体规划与植入
J Prosthodont. 2008 Aug;17(6):476-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00322.x. Epub 2008 May 9.
7
Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.在具有内六角连接的多种植体系统中使用不同种植体印模技术时印模和模型的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):39-47.
8
Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.模拟临床牙齿印模的数字化:精确性的虚拟三维分析
Dent Mater. 2009 Jul;25(7):929-36. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
9
Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study.图像引导种植手术的准确性评估:一项实验研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):382-6.
10
[Research on computer-aided technology of surgical guide for dental implant].[牙种植手术导板计算机辅助技术研究]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;28(1):1-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of orthodontic bracket block-out materials on superimposition errors when substituting scanned dental imaging data onto computed tomography images.正畸托槽遮挡材料在将扫描的牙科影像数据替换到计算机断层扫描图像上时对叠加误差的影响。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2024 Dec;54(4):319-326. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240046. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Positional transfer accuracy of titanium base implant abutment provided by two different scan body designs: an invitro study.两种不同扫描体设计的钛基种植体基台位置转移精度:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03399-9.
3
Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study.
全数字化工作流程与传统印模制作的研磨全牙弓种植支持式框架的比较:一项临床研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 15;16(2):833. doi: 10.3390/ma16020833.
4
Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner - an in vitro study.CAD/CAM 数字化桌面扫描仪的准确性——一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0976-1.
5
Marginal Accuracy and Internal Fit of 3-D Printing Laser-Sintered Co-Cr Alloy Copings.3D打印激光烧结钴铬合金冠内边缘精度和适合性
Materials (Basel). 2017 Jan 23;10(1):93. doi: 10.3390/ma10010093.