University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):162-72.
To determine the change in stability of three different implant systems using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and to correlate RFA measurements with factors related to implant design, length, and diameter, patient gender, and dental arch. Clinical and radiologic evaluations were performed up to 1 year after loading.
Three different types of implants from three different manufacturers were inserted in the posterior maxilla and mandible. RFA measurements were performed at implant placement and weekly up to 8 weeks postoperatively and were compared with respect to implant type, length, and diameter and dental arch. The implants were loaded after 8 weeks. All implants were examined radiographically at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Plaque Index, Sulcus Bleeding Index, peri-implant probing depths, and marginal bone loss were recorded. Repeated-measurements analysis of variance, two-tailed mixed-model analysis of variance, the Least Significant Differences and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analyses.
All the groups showed high stability values at all time points (above 71). There were statistically significant differences between groups at all time points except 1 and 2 weeks. Mandibular implants showed statistically higher stability values than maxillary implants. Wide implants showed statistically higher stability values than narrow implants. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.47 mm after 1 year.
All three implant systems showed clinically acceptable stability values prior to early loading. The success rates and bone loss were similar to the values reported in the literature.
使用共振频率分析(RFA)确定三种不同种植体系统稳定性的变化,并将 RFA 测量结果与与种植体设计、长度和直径、患者性别和牙弓相关的因素相关联。临床和放射学评估在加载后长达 1 年进行。
将三种不同制造商的三种不同类型的种植体插入上颌和下颌后牙区。在种植体植入和术后 8 周内每周进行 RFA 测量,并与种植体类型、长度和直径以及牙弓进行比较。8 周后进行种植体加载。所有种植体在基线和 6 个月和 12 个月时均进行放射学检查。记录菌斑指数、龈沟出血指数、种植体周围探诊深度和边缘骨丧失。采用重复测量方差分析、双侧混合模型方差分析、最小显著差异和曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行统计分析。
所有组在所有时间点(高于 71)均显示出高稳定性值。除第 1 周和第 2 周外,所有时间点组间均存在统计学差异。下颌种植体的稳定性值明显高于上颌种植体。宽种植体的稳定性值明显高于窄种植体。1 年后平均边缘骨丧失为 0.22±0.47mm。
所有三种种植体系统在早期加载前均显示出可接受的临床稳定性值。成功率和骨丢失与文献报道的值相似。