• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种早期负重种植体在负重后第一年的稳定性和边缘骨吸收情况。

Stability and marginal bone loss with three types of early loaded implants during the first year after loading.

机构信息

University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):162-72.

PMID:22299093
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the change in stability of three different implant systems using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and to correlate RFA measurements with factors related to implant design, length, and diameter, patient gender, and dental arch. Clinical and radiologic evaluations were performed up to 1 year after loading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three different types of implants from three different manufacturers were inserted in the posterior maxilla and mandible. RFA measurements were performed at implant placement and weekly up to 8 weeks postoperatively and were compared with respect to implant type, length, and diameter and dental arch. The implants were loaded after 8 weeks. All implants were examined radiographically at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Plaque Index, Sulcus Bleeding Index, peri-implant probing depths, and marginal bone loss were recorded. Repeated-measurements analysis of variance, two-tailed mixed-model analysis of variance, the Least Significant Differences and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

All the groups showed high stability values at all time points (above 71). There were statistically significant differences between groups at all time points except 1 and 2 weeks. Mandibular implants showed statistically higher stability values than maxillary implants. Wide implants showed statistically higher stability values than narrow implants. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.47 mm after 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

All three implant systems showed clinically acceptable stability values prior to early loading. The success rates and bone loss were similar to the values reported in the literature.

摘要

目的

使用共振频率分析(RFA)确定三种不同种植体系统稳定性的变化,并将 RFA 测量结果与与种植体设计、长度和直径、患者性别和牙弓相关的因素相关联。临床和放射学评估在加载后长达 1 年进行。

材料和方法

将三种不同制造商的三种不同类型的种植体插入上颌和下颌后牙区。在种植体植入和术后 8 周内每周进行 RFA 测量,并与种植体类型、长度和直径以及牙弓进行比较。8 周后进行种植体加载。所有种植体在基线和 6 个月和 12 个月时均进行放射学检查。记录菌斑指数、龈沟出血指数、种植体周围探诊深度和边缘骨丧失。采用重复测量方差分析、双侧混合模型方差分析、最小显著差异和曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行统计分析。

结果

所有组在所有时间点(高于 71)均显示出高稳定性值。除第 1 周和第 2 周外,所有时间点组间均存在统计学差异。下颌种植体的稳定性值明显高于上颌种植体。宽种植体的稳定性值明显高于窄种植体。1 年后平均边缘骨丧失为 0.22±0.47mm。

结论

所有三种种植体系统在早期加载前均显示出可接受的临床稳定性值。成功率和骨丢失与文献报道的值相似。

相似文献

1
Stability and marginal bone loss with three types of early loaded implants during the first year after loading.三种早期负重种植体在负重后第一年的稳定性和边缘骨吸收情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):162-72.
2
Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.采用经化学改良的喷砂酸蚀表面的非潜入式钛种植体早期负荷:一项聚焦于种植体周骨变化和种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)值的下颌后牙区前瞻性病例系列研究的 6 个月结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
3
Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation.双侧无牙颌中标准和改良喷砂酸蚀种植体的稳定性、边缘骨丧失和存活率:前瞻性 15 个月评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):840-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02065.x. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
4
A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.一项为期4年的前瞻性临床和放射学研究,该研究针对使用早期和延迟加载方案的上颌单颗牙种植体支持单冠修复情况。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Dec;9(4):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00045.x.
5
Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.种植体设计对早期负载、化学改良、喷砂酸蚀表面种植体周围边缘骨变化的影响:犬的组织学分析。
J Periodontol. 2011 Jul;82(7):1025-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100491. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
6
The influence of early loading on bony crest height and stability: a pilot study.早期负重对牙槽嵴高度和稳定性的影响:一项初步研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):506-12.
7
Resonance frequency analysis of one-stage dental implant stability during the osseointegration period.骨结合期单阶段牙种植体稳定性的共振频率分析
J Periodontol. 2005 Jul;76(7):1066-71. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1066.
8
Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.802颗采用新型喷砂和酸蚀表面的两段式潜入式即刻负重种植体的临床结果:12个月随访
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):763-8.
9
Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.部分牙列缺失下颌骨种植体即刻咬合负重:一项为期1年的影像学前瞻性研究和4年的临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):315-22.
10
Five-year treatment outcomes with four types of implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible in partially edentulous patients: a retrospective study.四种种植体在后牙区即刻负重修复的 5 年临床疗效回顾性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):639-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical study to assess influence of immediate provisionalization and various implant morphologies on implant stability: A prospective clinical study.评估即刻临时修复及不同种植体形态对种植体稳定性影响的临床研究:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1095741. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1095741. eCollection 2022.
2
The clinical significance of implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurements: A literature review.种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)测量的临床意义:文献综述。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
3
An evaluation of superhydrophilic surfaces of dental implants - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
评估牙科种植体的超亲水表面 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 May 10;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0767-8.
4
Multivariate linear regression analysis to identify general factors for quantitative predictions of implant stability quotient values.多元线性回归分析以确定用于种植体稳定性商值定量预测的一般因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 30;12(10):e0187010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187010. eCollection 2017.
5
Clinical evaluation of the stability of implants placed at different supracrestal levels.不同龈上水平植入种植体稳定性的临床评估。
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2016 Oct 1;50(3):21-31. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.96003. eCollection 2016.
6
Mathematical evaluation of the influence of multiple factors on implant stability quotient values in clinical practice: a retrospective study.临床实践中多因素对种植体稳定性商值影响的数学评估:一项回顾性研究。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Oct 11;12:1525-1532. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S113764. eCollection 2016.