评估即刻临时修复及不同种植体形态对种植体稳定性影响的临床研究：一项前瞻性临床研究。
Clinical study to assess influence of immediate provisionalization and various implant morphologies on implant stability: A prospective clinical study.
作者信息
Qi Meiyao, Deng Shiyong, Tan Zhen
机构信息
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
出版信息
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1095741. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1095741. eCollection 2022.
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different implant morphologies and immediate provisionalization options on the change of implant stability.
METHODS
94 Patients were randomized to receive implants from Straumann BL/Straumann BLT/Astra OsseoSpeed TX, meanwhile having the same opportunity to receive healing abutment or immediate provisionalization. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and marginal bone loss (MBL) were recorded at following timepoints. Parametric statistic was used for data analysis.
RESULTS
Data showed that ISQ and MBL values of conical/straight/straight with micro-thread neck implants had no significant difference.
DISCUSSION
Immediate provisionalization options could move the dip point of ISQ values ahead or delayed around one week, which were also relevant to implant systems. MBL values were proved to be unaffected by both two factors mentioned above.
引言
本研究的目的是评估不同种植体形态和即刻临时修复方案对种植体稳定性变化的影响。
方法
94例患者被随机分配接受来自士卓曼BL/士卓曼BLT/阿斯特拉骨速TX的种植体，同时有相同机会接受愈合基台或即刻临时修复。在以下时间点记录种植体稳定性商数（ISQ）和边缘骨丢失（MBL）。采用参数统计进行数据分析。
结果
数据显示，锥形/直形/带微螺纹颈部的直形种植体的ISQ和MBL值无显著差异。
讨论
即刻临时修复方案可使ISQ值的下降点提前或延迟约一周，这也与种植体系统有关。事实证明，MBL值不受上述两个因素的影响。
Zotero 插件