Center for Quality of Care Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA 01199, USA.
J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
The aim of this study was to examine treatments of septic shock in a sample of US hospitals and to assess whether patient and hospital characteristics are associated with use of sepsis therapies.
We studied 192 hospitals that treated 50 or more adults with septic shock between 2004 and 2006. We examined hospital-level variation in commonly used therapies including mechanical ventilation, activated protein C (APC), hydrocortisone, central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring, albumin/colloid, and pulmonary artery catheters. We calculated interquartile range to assess the hospital-level variation in treatment. We developed hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine the association between patient and hospital characteristics and selected treatments.
A total of 22702 patients met the inclusion criteria. When compared with patients younger than 45 years, patients 75 years or older were as likely to receive mechanical ventilation but less likely to receive APC (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.45]), hydrocortisone (OR, 0.65 [0.56-0.75]), or CVP monitoring (OR, 0.73 [0.63-0.84]). Compared with whites, black patients were more likely to be mechanically ventilated (OR, 1.15 [1.05-1.25]) but less likely to receive hydrocortisone (OR, 0.86 [0.78-0.95]) or APC (0.70 [0.58-0.86]).
Treatment of septic shock varies across hospitals. In contrast to mechanical ventilation, treatments with weaker supporting evidence showed greater variation, especially among black and older patients.
本研究旨在调查美国部分医院中脓毒性休克的治疗方法,并评估患者和医院特征是否与脓毒症治疗方法的应用相关。
我们研究了 192 家在 2004 年至 2006 年间治疗 50 名以上成人脓毒性休克患者的医院。我们检查了包括机械通气、活化蛋白 C(APC)、氢化可的松、中心静脉压(CVP)监测、白蛋白/胶体和肺动脉导管在内的常用疗法在各医院的应用差异。我们计算了四分位间距来评估治疗的医院间差异。我们建立了分层混合效应逻辑回归模型来检验患者和医院特征与所选治疗方法之间的关系。
共有 22702 名患者符合纳入标准。与 45 岁以下患者相比,75 岁及以上患者接受机械通气的可能性相同,但接受 APC(比值比 [OR],0.35 [95%置信区间,0.27-0.45])、氢化可的松(OR,0.65 [0.56-0.75])或 CVP 监测(OR,0.73 [0.63-0.84])的可能性较小。与白人相比,黑人患者更有可能接受机械通气(OR,1.15 [1.05-1.25]),但更不可能接受氢化可的松(OR,0.86 [0.78-0.95])或 APC(0.70 [0.58-0.86])。
脓毒性休克的治疗方法在各医院间存在差异。与机械通气相反,证据较弱的治疗方法差异更大,尤其是在黑人患者和老年患者中。