• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症晚期临床试验中最佳支持治疗的基于共识的标准。

Consensus-based standards for best supportive care in clinical trials in advanced cancer.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):e77-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70215-7.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70215-7
PMID:22300862
Abstract

Best supportive care is poorly defined in clinical trials, and a standard framework for delivery of such care is needed, using best available evidence and allowing replication of studies. We convened a panel of 36 experts to develop consensus statements via the Delphi method. The first round included open-ended questions; subsequent rounds sought to develop consensus-based standards. Consensus was assessed by use of a 5-point Likert agreement scale; more than 70% of panellists had to give a score of 5 to meet a-priori levels of consensus. The panel identified four key domains of best supportive care in clinical trials: multidisciplinary care; supportive care documentation; symptom assessment; and symptom management. Consensus was reached on 11 statements within these four domains. For example, 24 (96%) panellists recommended that the intervals between symptom assessments should be identical for control and experimental groups. Availability of resources was cited as a challenge to implementation of best supportive care standards.

摘要

最佳支持性护理在临床试验中定义不明确,需要使用最佳现有证据并允许研究复制来制定提供此类护理的标准框架。我们召集了一个由 36 名专家组成的小组,通过德尔菲法达成共识声明。第一轮包括开放性问题;随后的几轮旨在制定基于共识的标准。使用 5 分李克特同意量表评估共识;小组中超过 70%的成员必须得分为 5 分,才能达到事先设定的共识水平。该小组确定了临床试验中最佳支持性护理的四个关键领域:多学科护理;支持性护理文件记录;症状评估;以及症状管理。在这四个领域达成了 11 项共识声明。例如,24 名(96%)小组成员建议,对照组和实验组之间的症状评估间隔应相同。资源的可获得性被认为是实施最佳支持性护理标准的挑战。

相似文献

1
Consensus-based standards for best supportive care in clinical trials in advanced cancer.癌症晚期临床试验中最佳支持治疗的基于共识的标准。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):e77-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70215-7.
2
Best supportive care in clinical trials: review of the inconsistency in control arm design.临床试验中的最佳支持性治疗:对照臂设计不一致性的综述
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):6-11. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.192. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Standards for palliative care delivery in oncology settings.肿瘤治疗环境中的姑息治疗提供标准。
Cancer J. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5):436-43. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b13e3181f289f7.
4
Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life.多学科支持的长期护理临终关怀:改善临终关怀的综合方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 22;21(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1.
5
Development of clinical practice guidelines for supportive care in childhood cancer--prioritization of topics using a Delphi approach.儿童癌症支持性护理临床实践指南的制定——采用德尔菲法确定主题优先级
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):1987-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2559-7. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
A Delphi study investigating consensus among expert physiotherapists in relation to the management of low back pain.一项德尔菲研究,旨在调查物理治疗专家在腰痛管理方面的共识。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2008 Dec;6(4):197-210. doi: 10.1002/msc.126.
7
Development of a nationwide consensus syllabus of palliative medicine for undergraduate medical education in Japan: a modified Delphi method.制定日本本科医学教育中姑息医学全国共识教学大纲:改良 Delphi 法。
Palliat Med. 2012 Jul;26(5):744-52. doi: 10.1177/0269216311410346. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
8
Assessment and treatment of malnutrition in Dutch geriatric practice: consensus through a modified Delphi study.荷兰老年医学实践中营养不良的评估和治疗:通过改良 Delphi 研究达成共识。
Age Ageing. 2012 May;41(3):399-404. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs005. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
9
The development of a clinical management algorithm for early physical activity and mobilization of critically ill patients: synthesis of evidence and expert opinion and its translation into practice.制定危重症患者早期身体活动和活动管理的临床管理算法:证据和专家意见的综合及其转化为实践。
Clin Rehabil. 2011 Sep;25(9):771-87. doi: 10.1177/0269215510397677. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
10
Components and principles of a pediatric palliative care consultation: results of a Delphi study.儿科姑息治疗会诊的组成部分与原则:德尔菲研究结果
J Palliat Med. 2014 Nov;17(11):1206-13. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0121. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effects of a resistance exercise intervention for sarcopenia in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估抗阻运动干预对接受乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者肌肉减少症的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):1296. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14721-9.
2
Palliative care or supportive care?姑息治疗还是支持性护理?
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 14;25(4):100487. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100487.
3
Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.
免疫疗法或靶向疗法与晚期胃癌的最佳支持治疗对比:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Mar 4;56(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01155-y.
4
What is the economic and social return on investment for telephone cancer information and support services in Australia? An evaluative social return on investment study protocol.澳大利亚电话癌症信息和支持服务的投资经济和社会效益回报是什么?一项评估性社会投资回报研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e081425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081425.
5
Anticancer Drugs Compared to No Anticancer Drugs in Patients with Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancer: A Mapping Review and Evidence Gap Map.晚期肝胆癌患者中抗癌药物与无抗癌药物的比较:一项图谱综述和证据差距图
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Nov 10;15:1069-1085. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S431498. eCollection 2023.
6
Supportive Care: The "Keystone" of Modern Oncology Practice.支持性护理:现代肿瘤学实践的“基石”。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3860. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153860.
7
Brodalumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: An Expert Delphi Consensus Statement.布罗达单抗治疗中重度银屑病:专家德尔菲共识声明
J Clin Med. 2023 May 18;12(10):3545. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103545.
8
Systemic Oncological Treatments versus Supportive Care for Patients with Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancers: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.晚期肝胆癌患者的全身肿瘤治疗与支持性治疗:系统评价概述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 26;15(3):766. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030766.
9
Systemic oncological treatments in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a scoping review and evidence map.晚期胰腺癌患者的系统性肿瘤治疗:系统评价和证据图谱。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jan 9;31(2):100. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07564-8.
10
Second-line administration of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in immune thrombocytopenia: Italian Delphi-based consensus recommendations.免疫性血小板减少症中血小板生成素受体激动剂的二线治疗:基于意大利德尔菲法的共识推荐
Ther Adv Hematol. 2021 Oct 9;12:20406207211048361. doi: 10.1177/20406207211048361. eCollection 2021.