• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Novel clinical trial designs for the development of new antiretroviral agents.新型抗逆转录病毒药物研发的临床试验设计。
AIDS. 2012 May 15;26(8):899-907. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283519371.
2
Novel clinical trial designs for the development of new antiretroviral agents.用于新型抗逆转录病毒药物研发的新型临床试验设计。
AIDS. 2012 Sep 10;26(14):1847-8. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283573326.
3
Limitations of proposed novel trial design.所提出的新型试验设计的局限性。
AIDS. 2012 Sep 10;26(14):1846-7. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835732ee.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
5
Scientific and ethical considerations in trial design for investigational agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection.用于治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒感染的研究性药物试验设计中的科学与伦理考量
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jan 15;36(2):201-6. doi: 10.1086/367568. Epub 2003 Jan 8.
6
When clinical trials make history: demonstrating efficacy of new antiepileptic drugs as monotherapy.当临床试验创造历史:证明新型抗癫痫药物作为单药治疗的疗效。
Epilepsia. 2010 Oct;51(10):1933-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02589.x.
7
Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.洛匹那韦/利托那韦:其在HIV感染管理中的应用综述
Drugs. 2003;63(8):769-802. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00004.
8
A Bayesian dose-finding trial with adaptive dose expansion to flexibly assess efficacy and safety of an investigational drug.贝叶斯剂量探索试验结合适应性剂量扩展,灵活评估试验药物的疗效和安全性。
Clin Trials. 2010 Apr;7(2):121-35. doi: 10.1177/1740774510361541. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
9
Controversy trails adaptive clinical trials.适应性临床试验引发了争议。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 19;104(18):1347-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs404. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
10
Prototype antiepileptic drug clinical development plan.抗癫痫药物原型临床开发计划。
Epilepsia. 1993 Nov-Dec;34(6):1075-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb02136.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Inflammatory Biomarker Reduction With Fostemsavir Over 96 Weeks in Heavily Treatment-Experienced Adults With Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 in the BRIGHTE Study.在BRIGHTE研究中,接受过多种药物治疗的多重耐药HIV-1成年患者使用福斯他韦96周后炎症生物标志物的降低情况
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 26;11(9):ofae469. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae469. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Cefepime vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults Hospitalized With Acute Infection: The ACORN Randomized Clinical Trial.头孢吡肟与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗成人急性感染的疗效比较:ACORN 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Oct 24;330(16):1557-1567. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20583.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing antiretroviral therapy for treatment-experienced HIV adult patients using an optimized background therapy approach: is there evidence enough for a standardized third-line strategy?一项系统评价和荟萃分析评估了使用优化背景治疗方法的治疗经验丰富的 HIV 成年患者的抗逆转录病毒治疗:是否有足够的证据制定标准化的三线治疗策略?
Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02102-3.
4
Opportunities for therapeutic antibodies directed at G-protein-coupled receptors.靶向 G 蛋白偶联受体的治疗性抗体的机会。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Sep;16(9):787-810. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.91. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
5
The future of HIV treatment.HIV 治疗的未来。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Aug 1;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S39-40. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318258bc9f.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of lersivirine (UK-453,061) versus efavirenz in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: week 48 primary analysis results from an ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase IIb trial.在抗逆转录病毒治疗初治的 HIV-1 感染患者中,利匹韦林(UK-453,061)与依非韦伦的疗效和安全性:一项正在进行的、多中心、随机、双盲、IIb 期试验的第 48 周主要分析结果。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Feb 1;62(2):171-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31827a2ba2..
2
Efficacy of a nucleoside-sparing regimen of darunavir/ritonavir plus raltegravir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients (ACTG A5262).达芦那韦/利托那韦联合拉替拉韦治疗初治 HIV-1 感染患者的疗效(ACTG A5262)。
AIDS. 2011 Nov 13;25(17):2113-22. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834bbaa9.
3
Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. rilpivirine 与依非韦伦联合两种背景核苷(酸)逆转录酶抑制剂治疗初治 HIV-1 感染成人(THRIVE):一项 3 期、随机、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.
4
Atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz as part of a 3-drug regimen for initial treatment of HIV-1.阿扎那韦联合利托那韦或依非韦伦作为三药方案的一部分,用于 HIV-1 的初始治疗。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Apr 5;154(7):445-56. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-7-201104050-00316. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
5
Raltegravir versus Efavirenz regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy, durability, subgroup, safety, and metabolic analyses.拉替拉韦与依非韦伦方案治疗初治 HIV-1 感染患者:96 周疗效、持久性、亚组、安全性和代谢分析。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Sep;55(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181da1287.
6
The effects of intermittent, CD4-guided antiretroviral therapy on body composition and metabolic parameters.间歇、CD4 指导的抗逆转录病毒治疗对身体成分和代谢参数的影响。
AIDS. 2010 Jan 28;24(3):353-63. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283333666.
7
Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study.替拉那韦/利托那韦每日 1 次与洛匹那韦/利托那韦每日 2 次,分别联合替诺福韦和恩曲他滨,用于治疗初治 HIV-1 感染患者的疗效和安全性:CASTLE 研究 96 周结果。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Mar;53(3):323-32. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c990bf.
8
High rate of virologic suppression with raltegravir plus etravirine and darunavir/ritonavir among treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV: results of the ANRS 139 TRIO trial.在感染多重耐药HIV的经治患者中,雷特格韦联合依曲韦林及达芦那韦/利托那韦治疗的病毒学抑制率较高:ANRS 139 TRIO试验结果
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 1;49(9):1441-9. doi: 10.1086/630210.
9
The forum for collaborative HIV research: a model for an integrated and inclusive approach to clinical research and drug development.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep;86(3):332-5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.140. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
10
Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir vs. lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week analysis.初治的HIV-1感染患者中,每日一次达芦那韦/利托那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦的对比:96周分析。
AIDS. 2009 Aug 24;23(13):1679-88. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832d7350.

新型抗逆转录病毒药物研发的临床试验设计。

Novel clinical trial designs for the development of new antiretroviral agents.

机构信息

Forum for Collaborative HIV Research, University of California-Berkeley, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

AIDS. 2012 May 15;26(8):899-907. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283519371.

DOI:10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283519371
PMID:22301412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3343181/
Abstract

The resounding success of combination antiretroviral efficacy for both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients - with 70-90% viral suppression rates in recent studies - has made registration trials for new agents challenging. With the inevitable specter of drug resistance, new agents must have a pathway to approval. The Forum for Collaborative HIV Research obtained input from concerned stakeholders including industry, clinical sciences, community advocacy, and regulatory sciences (Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) to discuss how safety and efficacy of new agents could be demonstrated. Recognizing the shortfalls of superiority or noninferiority trials in this environment, a new trial design for treatment-experienced patients, minimizing the risk for drug resistance but allowing full assessment of safety, was proposed. The antiviral efficacy of an active investigational drug would be assessed by comparison to placebo as an add-on to a failing regimen in a short, 10-14-day study followed by institution of an optimized background regimen (OBR) in both arms with investigational drug given to all patients. The follow-on stage would assess dose response, safety, durability of initial response, and development of resistance. Additionally, a second safety trial could be conducted comparing patients randomized to the investigational agent with a new OBR to those on a new OBR and placebo. Finally, approval decisions could consider other long-term safety endpoints. Exposing treatment-naïve patients to investigational agents remains a controversial issue; stakeholders have different interpretations of risk-benefit for trials in this population that necessitate careful consideration before initiating trials in them.

摘要

联合抗逆转录病毒治疗在治疗初治和治疗经验丰富的患者中均取得了显著成功 - 最近的研究显示病毒抑制率达到 70-90% - 这使得新药物的注册试验变得具有挑战性。由于不可避免的耐药性问题,新药物必须有获得批准的途径。协作性 HIV 研究论坛从包括行业、临床科学、社区宣传和监管科学(美国食品和药物管理局和欧洲药品管理局)在内的利益相关者那里获得了意见,以讨论如何证明新药物的安全性和疗效。鉴于在这种环境下,优越性或非劣效性试验存在缺陷,为治疗经验丰富的患者提出了一种新的试验设计,最大限度地降低耐药风险,但可以全面评估安全性。在一项为期 10-14 天的短期研究中,将一种正在研究的活性药物作为失败方案的附加药物,与安慰剂进行比较,评估其抗病毒疗效,然后在两个治疗组中均采用优化背景治疗方案(OBR),并为所有患者提供研究药物。后续阶段将评估剂量反应、安全性、初始反应的持久性以及耐药性的发展。此外,还可以进行第二项安全性试验,比较随机分配到研究药物组的患者与新 OBR 组的患者和新 OBR 组的安慰剂组的患者。最后,批准决定可以考虑其他长期安全性终点。将治疗初治患者暴露于研究药物仍然是一个有争议的问题;利益相关者对该人群试验的风险-效益有不同的解释,在开始试验之前需要仔细考虑。