Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):279-85. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs004. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
This study explored associations among disease-management partnership functioning, synergy and effectiveness in the delivery of chronic-illness care.
This study had a cross-sectional design.
The study sample consists of 218 professionals (out of 393) participating in 22 disease-management partnerships in various regions of the Netherlands.
We assessed the relationships among partnership functioning, synergy and effectiveness in the delivery of chronic-illness care. Partnership functioning was assessed through leadership, resources, administration and efficiency. Synergy was considered the proximal outcome of partnership functioning, which, in turn, influenced the effectiveness of disease-management partnerships [measured with the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) survey instrument].
Overall ACIC scores ranged from 3 to 10, indicating basic/intermediate to optimal/comprehensive delivery of chronic-illness care. The results of the regression analysis demonstrate that partnership effectiveness was positively associated with leadership (β = 0.25; P≤ 0.01), and resources (β = 0.31; P≤ 0.001). No significant relationship was found between administration, efficiency and partnership effectiveness. Partnership synergy acted as a mediator for partnership functioning and was statistically significantly associated with partnership effectiveness (β = 0.25; P≤ 0.001).
Disease-management partnerships seemed better able to deliver higher levels of chronic-illness care when synergy is created between partners. Synergy was more likely to emerge with boundary-spanning leaders who understood and appreciated partners' different perspectives, could bridge their diverse cultures and were comfortable sharing ideas, resources and power. In addition, the acknowledgement of and ability to use members' resources are valuable in engaging partners' involvement and achieving synergy in disease-management partnerships.
本研究探讨了疾病管理伙伴关系的运作、协同作用与慢性病护理提供的有效性之间的关联。
本研究采用横断面设计。
研究样本由 218 名专业人员(来自 393 名)组成,他们参与了荷兰不同地区的 22 个疾病管理伙伴关系。
我们评估了慢性病护理提供中伙伴关系运作、协同作用和有效性之间的关系。伙伴关系运作通过领导力、资源、管理和效率来评估。协同作用被认为是伙伴关系运作的直接结果,进而影响疾病管理伙伴关系的有效性(使用慢性病护理评估(ACIC)调查工具进行测量)。
总体而言,ACIC 评分范围为 3 至 10 分,表明慢性病护理的基本/中级至最佳/全面提供。回归分析的结果表明,伙伴关系的有效性与领导力呈正相关(β=0.25;P≤0.01),与资源呈正相关(β=0.31;P≤0.001)。管理和效率与伙伴关系的有效性之间没有显著关系。伙伴关系协同作用是伙伴关系运作的中介变量,与伙伴关系的有效性呈统计学显著相关(β=0.25;P≤0.001)。
当合作伙伴之间产生协同作用时,疾病管理伙伴关系似乎更有能力提供更高水平的慢性病护理。具有跨越边界的领导能力的合作伙伴更有可能产生协同作用,这些领导者理解并欣赏合作伙伴的不同观点,能够弥合他们不同的文化,并乐于分享想法、资源和权力。此外,承认和利用成员的资源对于吸引合作伙伴的参与和实现疾病管理伙伴关系中的协同作用是有价值的。