• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰疾病管理伙伴关系中专业人员使用的伙伴关系自我评估工具简版(PSAT)的开发与验证

Development and validation of a short version of the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) among professionals in Dutch disease-management partnerships.

作者信息

Cramm Jane M, Strating Mathilde Mh, Nieboer Anna P

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy & Management (iBMG), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jun 30;4:224. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-224.

DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-4-224
PMID:21714931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138467/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The extent to which partnership synergy is created within quality improvement programmes in the Netherlands is unknown. In this article, we describe the psychometric testing of the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) among professionals in twenty-two disease-management partnerships participating in quality improvement projects focused on chronic care in the Netherlands. Our objectives are to validate the PSAT in the Netherlands and to reduce the number of items of the original PSAT while maintaining validity and reliability.

METHODS

The Dutch version of the PSAT was tested in twenty-two disease-management partnerships with 218 professionals. We tested the instrument by means of structural equation modelling, and examined its validity and reliability.

RESULTS

After eliminating 14 items, the confirmatory factor analyses revealed good indices of fit with the resulting 15-item PSAT-Short version (PSAT-S). Internal consistency as represented by Cronbach's alpha ranged from acceptable (0.75) for the 'efficiency' subscale to excellent for the 'leadership' subscale (0.87). Convergent validity was provided with high correlations of the partnership dimensions and partnership synergy (ranged from 0.512 to 0.609) and high correlations with chronic illness care (ranged from 0.447 to 0.329).

CONCLUSION

The psychometric properties and convergent validity of the PSAT-S were satisfactory rendering it a valid and reliable instrument for assessing partnership synergy and its dimensions of partnership functioning.

摘要

背景

在荷兰的质量改进项目中,伙伴关系协同效应的产生程度尚不清楚。在本文中,我们描述了在荷兰参与以慢性病护理为重点的质量改进项目的22个疾病管理伙伴关系中的专业人员中,对伙伴关系自我评估工具(PSAT)进行的心理测量测试。我们的目标是在荷兰验证PSAT,并在保持有效性和可靠性的同时减少原始PSAT的项目数量。

方法

PSAT的荷兰语版本在22个疾病管理伙伴关系中对218名专业人员进行了测试。我们通过结构方程建模对该工具进行了测试,并检验了其有效性和可靠性。

结果

在剔除14个项目后,验证性因素分析显示,由此产生的15项PSAT-Short版本(PSAT-S)具有良好的拟合指数。以Cronbach's alpha表示的内部一致性从“效率”子量表的可接受水平(0.75)到“领导力”子量表的优秀水平(0.87)不等。伙伴关系维度与伙伴关系协同效应之间具有高度相关性(范围从0.512至0.609),与慢性病护理之间也具有高度相关性(范围从0.447至0.329),从而提供了收敛效度。

结论

PSAT-S的心理测量特性和收敛效度令人满意,使其成为评估伙伴关系协同效应及其伙伴关系功能维度的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a short version of the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) among professionals in Dutch disease-management partnerships.荷兰疾病管理伙伴关系中专业人员使用的伙伴关系自我评估工具简版(PSAT)的开发与验证
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jun 30;4:224. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-224.
2
Development and validation of a short version of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) in Dutch disease management programs.开发和验证荷兰疾病管理计划中慢性病关怀评估(ACIC)的简短版本。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Jul 4;9:49. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-49.
3
Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands.在荷兰心血管疾病患者中对慢性病患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)及其简短版(PACIC-S)进行析因验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 31;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-104.
4
Adaptation and Validation of the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) for Use in the Elementary School Setting.改编和验证计划可持续性评估工具(PSAT)在小学环境中的使用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 29;18(21):11414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111414.
5
Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation.验证自我管理能力量表(SMAS)以及在老年患者住院后不久开发和验证更简短的量表(SMAS-S)。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jan 24;10:9. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-9.
6
Disease-management partnership functioning, synergy and effectiveness in delivering chronic-illness care.疾病管理伙伴关系在提供慢性病护理方面的功能、协同作用和效果。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):279-85. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs004. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
7
Psychometric Testing of the Preceptor Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT)-40 for Nursing Preceptors.护理导师自我评估工具(PSAT-40)的心理计量学测试。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022 Nov;53(11):491-499. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20221006-06. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Validation of the Dutch version of the primary care resources and support for self-management tool: A tool to assess the quality of self-management support.初级保健资源和自我管理支持工具荷兰语版的验证:一种评估自我管理支持质量的工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229771. eCollection 2020.
9
The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: a new instrument for public health programs.项目可持续性评估工具:公共卫生项目的新工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan 23;11:130184. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130184.
10
Lowering the burden: Shorter versions of the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) and Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT).减轻负担:项目可持续性评估工具(PSAT)和临床可持续性评估工具(CSAT)的简化版本。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 10;5(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00656-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Readiness and Sustainability for Integrated Care in Ontario, Canada with the Integrated Care Leadership Survey.通过综合护理领导力调查评估加拿大安大略省综合护理的准备情况和可持续性。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Aug 1;25(3):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7539. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review.评估健康研究伙伴关系成果和影响的工具:系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 5;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00937-9.
3
How are health research partnerships assessed? A systematic review of outcomes, impacts, terminology and the use of theories, models and frameworks.健康研究伙伴关系如何评估?对结果、影响、术语以及理论、模型和框架的使用进行的系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Dec 14;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00938-8.
4
Measuring partnership synergy and functioning: Multi-stakeholder collaboration in primary health care.测量伙伴关系协同效应和功能:基层医疗中的多方利益相关者合作。
PLoS One. 2021 May 28;16(5):e0252299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252299. eCollection 2021.
5
Development of a national medical leadership competency framework: the Dutch approach.制定国家医学领导力能力框架:荷兰的方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 28;19(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1800-y.
6
Organizational Context Matters: A Research Toolkit for Conducting Standardized Case Studies of Integrated Care Initiatives.组织背景很重要:开展综合护理举措标准化案例研究的研究工具包。
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jun 27;17(2):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2502.
7
The management of cardiovascular disease in the Netherlands: analysis of different programmes.荷兰心血管疾病管理:不同项目分析。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Aug 7;13:e028. doi: 10.5334/ijic.889. eCollection 2013.
8
High-quality chronic care delivery improves experiences of chronically ill patients receiving care.高质量的慢性病护理可改善接受护理的慢性病患者的体验。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):689-95. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt065. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands.在荷兰心血管疾病患者中对慢性病患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)及其简短版(PACIC-S)进行析因验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 31;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-104.
10
Evaluating an integrated neighbourhood approach to improve well-being of frail elderly in a Dutch community: a study protocol.评估一种综合社区方法以改善荷兰社区体弱老年人的福祉:一项研究方案。
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Dec 13;4:532. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-532.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the relationship between synergy and partnership functioning factors in health promotion partnerships.探索健康促进伙伴关系中协同作用与伙伴关系运作因素之间的关系。
Health Promot Int. 2011 Dec;26(4):408-20. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar002. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
2
Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol.大规模实施疾病管理计划在荷兰不同地区的评估:研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 10;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-6.
3
Interprofessional partnerships in chronic illness care: a conceptual model for measuring partnership effectiveness.慢性病照护中的跨专业合作:衡量合作成效的概念模型。
Int J Integr Care. 2008 May 15;8:e08. doi: 10.5334/ijic.235.
4
The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks.跨专业协作的概念基础:核心概念与理论框架
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:116-31. doi: 10.1080/13561820500082529.
5
Creating partnership synergy: the critical role of community stakeholders.创造伙伴关系协同效应:社区利益相关者的关键作用。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2003 Summer;26(1):119-39.
6
The challenge of promoting integration: conceptualization, implementation, and assessment of a pilot care delivery model for patients with type 2 diabetes.促进整合的挑战:2型糖尿病患者试点护理模式的概念化、实施与评估
Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36(1):40-5.
7
The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model.扩展的慢性病照护模式:整合来自人群健康促进和慢性病照护模式的概念与策略。
Hosp Q. 2003;7(1):73-82. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2003.16763.
8
Integrated local networks as a model for organizing mental health services.作为组织精神卫生服务模式的综合地方网络。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2002 Sep;30(1):55-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1021227600823.
9
Making the most of collaboration: exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and partnership functioning.充分利用合作:探索伙伴关系协同效应与伙伴关系运作之间的关系。
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):683-98. doi: 10.1177/109019802237938.
10
Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement.慢性病护理评估(ACIC):一种衡量质量改进的实用工具。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):791-820. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00049.