Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胃缺血预处理在微创食管切除术前的随机对照试验,LOGIC 试验。

Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.

机构信息

Department of Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1822-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2123-1. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a viable alternative to open resection for the management of esophagogastric cancer. However, the technique may relate to a higher incidence of ischemia-related gastric conduit complications. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning (LIC) by ligating the left gastric vessels 2 weeks before MIE may have a protective role, possibly through an improvement of conduit perfusion. This project was designed to evaluate whether LIC influenced ultimate conduit perfusion.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare MIE with LIC (L) against MIE without (N). The project began in May 2009 and was offered to consecutive patients with the objective of recruiting 22 in each arm. Sample size calculations were based on data from previous clinical series. The main outcome measure was perfusion recorded by validated laser Doppler fluximetry, at the fundus (F) and greater curve (G); performed at routine staging laparoscopy and every stage of an MIE. A perfusion coefficient measured as ratio at stage of MIE over baseline was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were recruited before an interim analysis of the trial data. At staging laparoscopy perfusion at F was higher than at G (p = 0.016). In the L cohort, an apparent rise in perfusion at G is observed post intervention (p = 0.176). At MIE, baseline perfusion is comparable for both arms; however, a significant drop is observed at both locations once the stomach is mobilized and exteriorized (p = 0.001). Once delivered at the neck, perfusion coefficient is approximately 38% of baseline levels. However, there was no discernible difference between the L (38.3 ± 12) and N (37.7 ± 16.8) cohorts (p = 0.798).

CONCLUSIONS

LIC does not translate into an improved perfusion of the gastric conduit tip. The benefits reported from published clinical series suggest that the resistance of the conduit to ischemia occurs through alternative possibly microcellular mechanisms.

摘要

介绍

微创食管切除术(MIE)是治疗食管胃交界癌的一种可行的开放切除替代方法。然而,该技术可能与更高的缺血相关胃管并发症发生率有关。在 MIE 前 2 周结扎胃左血管的腹腔镜缺血预处理(LIC)可能具有保护作用,可能通过改善管腔灌注来实现。本项目旨在评估 LIC 是否影响最终管腔灌注。

方法

设计了一项随机对照试验,比较了 MIE 联合 LIC(L 组)与 MIE 不联合 LIC(N 组)的疗效。该项目于 2009 年 5 月开始,向连续患者提供该方案,目的是在每组中招募 22 名患者。样本量计算基于以前的临床系列数据。主要观察指标为通过验证的激光多普勒流量测定记录的灌注,在胃底(F)和大弯(G)处;在常规分期腹腔镜检查和 MIE 的每个阶段进行。使用 MIE 阶段与基线相比的灌注系数作为统计分析的指标。

结果

在试验数据的中期分析之前,招募了 16 名患者。在分期腹腔镜检查时,F 处的灌注高于 G 处(p = 0.016)。在 L 组中,术后 G 处的灌注似乎有所增加(p = 0.176)。在 MIE 时,两组的基线灌注相似;然而,一旦胃被游离并外置,在两个部位都观察到明显的下降(p = 0.001)。一旦被送到颈部,灌注系数约为基线水平的 38%。然而,L 组(38.3 ± 12)和 N 组(37.7 ± 16.8)之间没有明显差异(p = 0.798)。

结论

LIC 并不能改善胃管尖端的灌注。从已发表的临床系列报告中获得的益处表明,管腔对缺血的抵抗力通过可能的微观细胞机制来实现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验