Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2208-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2161-3.
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) is an established technique for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Several techniques and devices can be used for proximal mesh fixation on the sacral promontory during this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the fixation strength of a recently introduced screw for mesh fixation on the promontory during LVR with two other frequently used techniques.
An ex vivo experimental model using a porcine spinal column was designed to measure the strength of proximal mesh fixation. In a laparoscopic box trainer, a polypropylene mesh was anchored on the spinal column using three different fixation methods, i.e., the Protack 5-mm tacker device, Ethibond Excel 2-0 stitches, and the Karl Storz screw. Subsequently, increasing traction was applied to the mesh. This traction was applied at a standardized angle as determined by measuring the mean angle between the site of distal mesh fixation on the rectum and a line straight through the sacral promontory on 12 random dynamic MR scans of the pelvic floor after the LVR procedure. The applied force was measured at the moment that the fixation broke, using a calibrated electronic Newton meter. All fixation methods were tested ten times.
The mean angle, as measured on the MR scans, was 100°. The mean disruption force, which led to a break of the proximal mesh fixation, was 58 N for the three Protack tacks, 55 N for the two stitches, and 70 N for the new screw. The use of a screw therefore led to a significantly stronger fixation compared to the use of stitches (p ≤ 0.05). No significant difference was determined between the tacks and the screw fixation and between the tacks and the stitches fixation.
The new screw for proximal mesh fixation during LVR procedures offers similar fixation strength when compared to tacks. The use of one screw for proximal mesh fixation is therefore a reasonable alternative to the use of several tacks or sutures.
腹腔镜下腹膜直肠前切除术(LVR)是治疗直肠脱垂的一种成熟技术。在该手术中,有几种技术和设备可用于在骶骨岬上固定近端网片。本研究旨在比较一种新引入的用于 LVR 术中在骶骨岬上固定网片的螺钉与另外两种常用技术的固定强度。
设计了一种使用猪脊柱的离体实验模型,以测量近端网片固定的强度。在腹腔镜箱式训练器中,使用三种不同的固定方法将聚丙烯网片固定在脊柱上,即 Protack 5mm 钉枪装置、Ethibond Excel 2-0 缝线和 Karl Storz 螺钉。随后,对网片施加逐渐增加的牵引力。这种牵引力以一种标准化的角度施加,该角度通过测量 12 例 LVR 术后骨盆底部动态磁共振扫描中直肠远端网片固定部位与通过骶骨岬的直线之间的平均角度来确定。使用校准的电子牛顿计在固定物断裂的瞬间测量施加的力。所有固定方法均测试 10 次。
磁共振扫描测量的平均角度为 100°。导致近端网片固定断裂的平均破坏力,三个 Protack 钉的破坏力为 58N,两根缝线的破坏力为 55N,新螺钉的破坏力为 70N。因此,与缝线相比,使用螺钉可导致更强的固定(p≤0.05)。钉枪固定与螺钉固定之间以及钉枪固定与缝线固定之间未确定显著差异。
在 LVR 手术中,用于近端网片固定的新型螺钉提供了与钉枪相似的固定强度。因此,与使用多个钉枪或缝线相比,使用一个螺钉进行近端网片固定是合理的替代方法。