Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Mar;11(3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70017-0. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
In the AVERROES study, apixaban, a novel factor Xa inhibitor, reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation who were at high risk of stroke but unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. We aimed to investigate whether the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) would show a greater benefit from apixaban compared with aspirin than would patients without previous cerebrovascular events.
In AVERROES, 5599 patients (mean age 70 years) with atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk of stroke and unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy were randomly assigned to receive apixaban (5 mg twice daily) or aspirin (81-324 mg per day). The mean follow-up was 1·1 years. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patients and investigators were masked to study treatment. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we used Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year event risk and Cox proportional hazards regression models to compare the effects of apixaban in patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. AVERROES is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00496769.
In patients with previous stroke or TIA, ten events of stroke or systemic embolism occurred in the apixaban group (n=390, cumulative hazard 2·39% per year) compared with 33 in the aspirin group (n=374, 9·16% per year; hazard ratio [HR] 0·29, 95% CI 0·15-0·60). In those without previous stroke or TIA, 41 events occurred in the apixaban group (n=2417, 1·68% per year) compared with 80 in the aspirin group (n=2415, 3·06% per year; HR 0·51, 95% CI 0·35-0·74). The p value for interaction of the effects of aspirin and apixaban with previous cerebrovascular events was 0·17. Major bleeding was more frequent in patients with history of stroke or TIA than in patients without (HR 2·88, 95% CI 1·77-4·55) but risk of this event did not differ between treatment groups.
In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban is similarly effective whether or not patients have had a previous stroke or TIA. Given that those with previous stroke or TIA have a higher risk of stroke, the absolute benefits might be greater in these patients.
Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.
在 AVERROES 研究中,新型 Xa 因子抑制剂阿哌沙班降低了伴有高卒中风险但不适合华法林治疗的房颤患者的卒中或全身性栓塞风险。我们旨在研究与阿司匹林相比,先前有卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的亚组患者是否会从阿哌沙班中获益更多。
在 AVERROES 中,5599 名伴有高卒中风险且不适合华法林治疗的房颤患者(平均年龄 70 岁)被随机分配接受阿哌沙班(每日两次 5mg)或阿司匹林(81-324mg/天)治疗。平均随访时间为 1.1 年。主要疗效终点为卒中或全身性栓塞;主要安全性终点为大出血。患者和研究者对研究治疗均不知情。在该预先设定的亚组分析中,我们使用 1 年事件风险的 Kaplan-Meier 估计和 Cox 比例风险回归模型来比较阿哌沙班在有和无先前卒中或 TIA 的患者中的效果。AVERROES 在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00496769。
在有先前卒中或 TIA 的患者中,阿哌沙班组有 10 例卒中或全身性栓塞事件(n=390,每年累积风险 2.39%),而阿司匹林组有 33 例(n=374,每年 9.16%;风险比[HR]0.29,95%CI0.15-0.60)。在无先前卒中或 TIA 的患者中,阿哌沙班组有 41 例卒中事件(n=2417,每年 1.68%),而阿司匹林组有 80 例(n=2415,每年 3.06%;HR0.51,95%CI0.35-0.74)。阿司匹林和阿哌沙班与先前脑血管事件的效果相互作用的 p 值为 0.17。有卒中或 TIA 病史的患者大出血的发生率高于无病史的患者(HR2.88,95%CI1.77-4.55),但两组之间的大出血风险并无差异。
在伴有房颤的患者中,无论患者是否有先前的卒中或 TIA,阿哌沙班的疗效相似。鉴于先前有卒中或 TIA 的患者卒中风险更高,这些患者的绝对获益可能更大。
百时美施贵宝和辉瑞。