• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活体肾捐献者的动机和体验:主题综合分析。

The motivations and experiences of living kidney donors: a thematic synthesis.

机构信息

Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul;60(1):15-26. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.043. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.043
PMID:22305757
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Living kidney donation is associated with better recipient outcomes compared with deceased kidney donation, but living kidney donors face the risk of physical and psychological complications. The aim of this study was to synthesize published qualitative studies of the experiences and perspectives of living kidney donors.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies of motivations to donate and experiences after donation of living kidney donors. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and reference lists of articles were searched to April 2011.

RESULTS

26 studies involving 478 donors were included. We identified 6 themes about the decision to donate: compelled altruism, inherent responsibility, accepting risks, family expectation, personal benefit, and spiritual confirmation. Three themes dominated the impact of donation and postdonation: renegotiating identity (including subthemes of fear and vulnerability, sense of loss, depression and guilt, new appreciation of life, and personal growth and self-worth), renegotiating roles (including subthemes of multiplicity of roles, unable to resume previous activities, and hero status), and renegotiating relationships (including subthemes of neglect, proprietorial concern, strengthened family and recipient bonds, and avoidance of recipient indebtedness).

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney donation has a profound and multifaceted impact on the lives of donors and requires them to renegotiate their identity, roles, and relationships. Strategies to safeguard against unwarranted coercion, and to maximize donor resilience, capacity to negotiate their multiple roles as a patient and carer, emotional fortitude, and ability to have balanced expectations and relationships with the recipient and the family are needed to ultimately protect the safety and well-being of living kidney donors.

摘要

背景

与死后肾脏捐献相比,活体肾脏捐献与更好的受者结果相关,但活体肾脏捐献者面临身体和心理并发症的风险。本研究的目的是综合已发表的关于活体肾脏捐献者经历和观点的定性研究。

方法

我们对活体肾脏捐献者捐献动机和捐献后经历的定性研究进行了系统评价和主题综合分析。检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和文章参考文献列表,检索时间截至 2011 年 4 月。

结果

共纳入 26 项研究,涉及 478 名捐献者。我们确定了 6 个关于捐献决定的主题:强制利他主义、内在责任、接受风险、家庭期望、个人利益和精神确认。有 3 个主题主导了捐献和捐后影响:重新协商身份(包括恐惧和脆弱感、失落感、抑郁和内疚感、对生活新的欣赏和个人成长和自我价值感等子主题)、重新协商角色(包括角色多样性、无法恢复以前的活动、英雄地位等子主题)和重新协商关系(包括忽视、专有权关注、加强家庭和受者关系以及避免受者负债等子主题)。

结论

肾脏捐献对捐献者的生活产生了深远而多方面的影响,需要他们重新协商自己的身份、角色和关系。需要采取策略来保护捐献者免受不必要的强制,并最大限度地提高其适应能力,使其能够协商作为患者和照顾者的多个角色,保持情感坚韧,以及平衡对受者和家庭的期望和关系,从而最终保护活体肾脏捐献者的安全和福祉。

相似文献

1
The motivations and experiences of living kidney donors: a thematic synthesis.活体肾捐献者的动机和体验:主题综合分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul;60(1):15-26. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.043. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Psychological Impact of Living Kidney Donation: A Systematic Review by the EAU-YAU Kidney Transplant Working Group.活体肾脏捐赠的心理影响:EAU-YAU 肾脏移植工作组的系统评价。
Transpl Int. 2023 Nov 24;36:11827. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11827. eCollection 2023.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
7
Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.调查卵母细胞捐赠者、接受者和卵子共享者的心理社会态度、动机和经验:系统评价。
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):450-65. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw006. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
9
A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation.一项关于精子捐赠者的系统回顾:捐赠者的人口统计学特征、态度、动机和捐精过程的体验。
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):37-51. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms039. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Family-Related Motivation and Regret Intensity Among Family Liver Donors by Type of Family Relationship.按家庭关系类型划分的家庭活体肝供者的家庭相关动机及遗憾强度
Ann Transplant. 2025 Mar 25;30:e947414. doi: 10.12659/AOT.947414.
2
Improving healthcare services for living kidney donors: an experience-based approach in the Netherlands.改善活体肾供体的医疗服务:荷兰的一种基于经验的方法。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 25;13:1512852. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1512852. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach.
活体供肾肾切除术后从开放手术向腹腔镜及微创机器人手术方式转变过程中急性疼痛管理的评估
Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Jan-Mar;19(1):39-44. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_425_24. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
4
Fatigue in living kidney donors compared to a German general population sample: an exploratory study.与德国普通人群样本相比,活体肾供者的疲劳:一项探索性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 30;15:1510738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1510738. eCollection 2024.
5
Depression, anxiety, and quality of life among kidney donors before and after the kidney donation: A prospective study from a tertiary care center in India.肾脏捐献前后肾脏捐献者的抑郁、焦虑及生活质量:来自印度一家三级医疗中心的前瞻性研究
Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Jul-Dec;33(2):334-340. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_241_24. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
6
The lived experience of living liver donors: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.活体肝供者的生活体验:定性研究的元综合分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 19;23(1):925. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02611-7.
7
A qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators in deceased organ donation process among transplant coordinators in India.一项探索印度器官移植协调员在死亡器官捐献过程中面临的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 20;14(1):28773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80290-9.
8
Experiences of Unanticipated Outcomes Among Ethnically Diverse Living Kidney Donors: A Qualitative Pilot Study.不同族裔活体肾供者经历意外结果的定性试点研究。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Oct;38(10):e15476. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15476.
9
Post-Donation Evaluation: Emotional Needs for Social Connection and Social Support among Living Kidney Donors-A Systematic Review.捐献后评估:活体肾捐献者对社会联系和社会支持的情感需求——一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 18;12(12):1216. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121216.
10
Living Kidney Donation: A Narrative Review of Mid- and Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes.活体肾捐赠:对中长期心理社会结局的叙述性综述
Transplantation. 2025 Feb 1;109(2):259-272. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005094. Epub 2024 Jun 18.