• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾脏捐献前后肾脏捐献者的抑郁、焦虑及生活质量:来自印度一家三级医疗中心的前瞻性研究

Depression, anxiety, and quality of life among kidney donors before and after the kidney donation: A prospective study from a tertiary care center in India.

作者信息

Chopra Geetika, Gaur Vikas

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Department of Psychiatry, JNUIMSRC, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Jul-Dec;33(2):334-340. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_241_24. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

DOI:10.4103/ipj.ipj_241_24
PMID:39898088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11784696/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kidney donation is a significant procedure that can profoundly impact the emotional, psychological, and social well-being of renal donors. However, there is a lack of sufficient evidence regarding the specific effects of donation on the mental health and quality of life (QOL) of living kidney donors.

AIM

To evaluate and compare the levels of depression, anxiety, and QOL among living kidney donors before and after the donation procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective longitudinal cohort study involving 50 consecutive living renal donors, assessing them before and 3 months after kidney donation. Depression and anxiety were evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), respectively. Furthermore, the QOL of kidney donors was compared using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF).

RESULT

The average age of kidney donors was 40.86 ± 8.59 years. Pre-transplant HAM-D and HAM-A scores showed significant negative correlations with post-transplant QoL domains (** < 0.001). Regression analysis highlighted pre-transplant HAM-D as a significant predictor of post-transplant depression ( = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant differences in pre- and post-donation HAM-D and HAM-A scores were found, but clinical significance is crucial for interpreting real-world implications. Renal transplantation did not worsen mental health or QOL for donors post transplant, highlighting the importance of addressing pre-transplant depression and anxiety. Further research is needed to assess clinical significance and integrate mental health considerations into transplant care.

摘要

背景

肾脏捐赠是一项重大手术,会对肾脏捐赠者的情绪、心理和社会福祉产生深远影响。然而,关于捐赠对活体肾脏捐赠者心理健康和生活质量(QOL)的具体影响,目前缺乏足够的证据。

目的

评估和比较活体肾脏捐赠者在捐赠手术前后的抑郁、焦虑水平及生活质量。

材料与方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性纵向队列研究,连续纳入50名活体肾脏捐赠者,在肾脏捐赠前及捐赠后3个月对他们进行评估。分别使用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM - A)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM - D)评估抑郁和焦虑情况。此外,使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)比较肾脏捐赠者的生活质量。

结果

肾脏捐赠者的平均年龄为40.86±8.59岁。移植前HAM - D和HAM - A评分与移植后生活质量领域呈显著负相关(**<0.001)。回归分析表明,移植前HAM - D是移植后抑郁的显著预测因子(=0.013)。

结论

发现捐赠前后HAM - D和HAM - A评分存在统计学上的显著差异,但临床意义对于解释实际影响至关重要。肾脏移植并未使捐赠者移植后的心理健康或生活质量恶化,这突出了应对移植前抑郁和焦虑的重要性。需要进一步研究以评估临床意义,并将心理健康考量纳入移植护理中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/11784696/48db4aba6676/IPJ-33-334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/11784696/8ae0be51454f/IPJ-33-334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/11784696/f49dfff5d118/IPJ-33-334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/11784696/48db4aba6676/IPJ-33-334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/11784696/8ae0be51454f/IPJ-33-334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/11784696/f49dfff5d118/IPJ-33-334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/11784696/48db4aba6676/IPJ-33-334-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Depression, anxiety, and quality of life among kidney donors before and after the kidney donation: A prospective study from a tertiary care center in India.肾脏捐献前后肾脏捐献者的抑郁、焦虑及生活质量:来自印度一家三级医疗中心的前瞻性研究
Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Jul-Dec;33(2):334-340. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_241_24. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
The quality of life of women volunteering as live-related kidney donors in India.印度活体亲属肾捐献女性志愿者的生活质量。
Natl Med J India. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):342-4.
3
Quality of life, depression and anxiety in potential living liver donors for pediatric recipients: A retrospective single center experience.小儿受者潜在活体肝供者的生活质量、抑郁和焦虑:一项单中心回顾性研究
World J Hepatol. 2022 Oct 27;14(10):1899-1906. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i10.1899.
4
Can renal transplant improve the quality of life of caregiver donors? A prospective study from India.肾移植能否提高照顾者供者的生活质量?来自印度的一项前瞻性研究。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2021 Mar-Apr;32(2):510-521. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.335464.
5
Resilience and quality of life in 161 living kidney donors before nephrectomy and in the aftermath of donation: a naturalistic single center study.161例活体肾供者肾切除术前及术后的恢复力与生活质量:一项单中心自然主义研究
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Oct 16;16:164. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0160-z.
6
A prospective study on living related kidney donors' quality of life in the first year: choosing appropriate reference data.一项关于活体相关肾移植供者在移植后第一年生活质量的前瞻性研究:选择合适的参考数据。
Clin Transplant. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(4):E418-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2012.01691.x.
7
Donor quality of life up to two years after living donor liver transplantation: a prospective study.活体供肝移植后两年内供者生活质量的前瞻性研究。
Transplantation. 2014 Mar 15;97(5):582-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000438206.04348.b2.
8
Impact assessment in living kidney donation: psychosocial aspects in the donor.活体肾捐赠的影响评估:捐赠者的社会心理方面
Transplant Proc. 2008 Apr;40(3):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.02.036.
9
Changes in the quality of life of living liver donors: A meta-analysis.活体肝移植供者生活质量变化的 Meta 分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103586. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103586. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Psychological assessment and lived experiences of recovered COVID-19 patients who presented for convalescent plasma donation.康复的 COVID-19 患者接受恢复期血浆捐献的心理评估和生活体验。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2021 Aug;28(3):254-257. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Distress Symptoms and Life Satisfaction Among Living Kidney Donors: Frequency and Association With Subjective Evaluations.活体肾供者的心理困扰症状与生活满意度:频率及其与主观评价的关联
Transplant Proc. 2019 Sep;51(7):2232-2236. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.154. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
Evaluation of psychiatric issues in renal transplant setting.肾移植背景下精神问题的评估。
Indian J Nephrol. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):321-5. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.165006.
3
The Course and Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Living Kidney Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
活体肾供体健康相关生活质量的病程及预测因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Transplant. 2015 Dec;15(12):3041-54. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13453. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Quality of life assessment in a living donor kidney transplantation program: evaluation of recipients and donors.活体供肾移植项目中的生活质量评估:受者与供者的评价
Transplant Proc. 2013 Apr;45(3):1106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.100.
5
Psychologic functioning of unspecified anonymous living kidney donors before and after donation.未指定匿名活体肾捐献者捐献前后的心理功能。
Transplantation. 2013 Jun 15;95(11):1369-74. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31828eaf81.
6
Living kidney donors--a prospective study of quality of life before and after kidney donation.活体肾捐献者——肾捐献前后生活质量的前瞻性研究。
Clin Transplant. 2013 Jan-Feb;27(1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2012.01687.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
The quality of life of women volunteering as live-related kidney donors in India.印度活体亲属肾捐献女性志愿者的生活质量。
Natl Med J India. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):342-4.
8
Outcome of right hepatectomy for living liver donors: a single Egyptian center experience.右半肝活体肝移植供者的结局:埃及单中心经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1181-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1851-4. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
9
The motivations and experiences of living kidney donors: a thematic synthesis.活体肾捐献者的动机和体验:主题综合分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul;60(1):15-26. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.043. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
10
Live related donors in India: Their quality of life using world health organization quality of life brief questionnaire.
Indian J Urol. 2011 Jan;27(1):25-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.78411.