• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Word processing speed in peripheral vision measured with a saccadic choice task.

作者信息

Chanceaux Myriam, Vitu Françoise, Bendahman Luisa, Thorpe Simon, Grainger Jonathan

机构信息

Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Aix Marseille University and CNRS, Marseille Cedex, France.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2012 Mar 1;56:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.014
PMID:22306679
Abstract

A saccadic choice task (Kirchner & Thorpe, 2006) was used to measure word processing speed in peripheral vision. To do so, word targets were accompanied by distractor stimuli, which were random strings of consonants presented in the contralateral visual field. Participants were also tested with the animal stimuli of Kirchner and Thorpe's original study. The results obtained with the animal stimuli provide a straightforward replication of prior findings, with the estimated fastest saccade latencies to animal targets being 140 ms. With the word targets, the fastest reliable saccades occurred with latencies of around 200 ms. The results obtained with word targets provide a timing estimate for word processing in peripheral vision that is incompatible with sequential-attention-shift (SAS) accounts of eye movement control in reading.

摘要

相似文献

1
Word processing speed in peripheral vision measured with a saccadic choice task.
Vision Res. 2012 Mar 1;56:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
2
[Lateralization of saccadic latency during monocular presentation of stimuli to a leading and non-leading eye].[在向主导眼和非主导眼单眼呈现刺激时扫视潜伏期的侧化]
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 2003 Jan-Feb;53(1):33-40.
3
Human transsaccadic visual processing: presaccadic remapping and postsaccadic updating.人类眼跳间的视觉处理:眼跳前的重映射和眼跳后的更新。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.028. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
4
Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms.快速朝向面部的扫视:仅需100毫秒即可检测到面部。
J Vis. 2010 Apr 28;10(4):16.1-17. doi: 10.1167/10.4.16.
5
Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?扫视目标选择:干扰因素会影响扫视准确性吗?
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
6
Deficits in saccadic eye-movement control in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中眼球扫视运动控制的缺陷。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):784-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.026.
7
Changes in orientation discrimination at the time of saccadic eye movements.扫视眼动时方向辨别能力的变化。
Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.014. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
8
TMS over human frontal eye fields disrupts trans-saccadic memory of multiple objects.经颅磁刺激人类额眼区会破坏多个物体的眼跳间记忆。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Apr;20(4):759-72. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp148. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
9
Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.旁中央凹加工中的右视野优势:来自眼动注视相关电位的证据。
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):101-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
10
Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task.人工视觉模拟:II. 整页文本的偏心阅读及该任务的学习
Vision Res. 2004;44(14):1693-706. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.017.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Eye Movement Measures across Reading Efficiency Quartile Groups in Elementary, Middle, and High School Students in the U.S.美国小学生、初中生和高中生阅读效率四分位数组的眼动测量比较
J Eye Mov Res. 2017 Dec 2;10(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.10.4.5.
2
Network dynamics of Broca's area during word selection.布罗卡区在选词过程中的网络动态。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 20;14(12):e0225756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225756. eCollection 2019.
3
Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
语言加工并不胜过视动限制,但它们可以调节眼球运动的位置,而不考虑单词边界:阅读过程中自上而下的基于单词的眼动控制的证据被否定。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219666. eCollection 2019.
4
Locating the cortical bottleneck for slow reading in peripheral vision.定位周边视觉中慢速阅读的皮质瓶颈。
J Vis. 2015 Aug 1;15(11):3. doi: 10.1167/15.11.3.