• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强结肠镜检查的肠道准备:一项综合综述。

Enhancing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: an integrative review.

作者信息

Van Dongen Monica

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):36-44. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3182403413.

DOI:10.1097/SGA.0b013e3182403413
PMID:22306728
Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Currently, colonoscopy is considered the gold standard to detect colorectal cancer. Poor bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy compromises the quality and efficacy of this procedure, affecting patient outcomes and increasing overall costs. With up to 25% of patients undergoing colonoscopy having poor bowel preparation, interventions to enhance the quality of bowel preparations are vital to improving clinical practice. Through an extensive review of the current literature, split-dose bowel preparation regimens appear to be the most well-supported and plausible intervention for meaningful change in efforts to enhance bowel preparation. Several studies of high quality and strength have drawn consistent conclusions that split-dose bowel preparations result in significantly better bowel cleansing than traditional day-prior bowel preparation regimens. Strengths, limitations, gaps in the current literature, and areas for future research are identified, which can help to direct future studies needed to strengthen the evidence and determine further practice initiatives to address the problem of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

摘要

结直肠癌是美国第三大常见癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的第二大主要原因。目前,结肠镜检查被认为是检测结直肠癌的金标准。接受结肠镜检查的患者肠道准备不佳会损害该检查的质量和效果,影响患者预后并增加总体成本。高达25%接受结肠镜检查的患者肠道准备不佳,因此采取干预措施提高肠道准备质量对于改善临床实践至关重要。通过对当前文献的广泛回顾,分次给药肠道准备方案似乎是在提高肠道准备效果方面最有依据且合理的干预措施。多项高质量、高强度的研究得出了一致结论,即分次给药肠道准备比传统的提前一天肠道准备方案能显著更好地清洁肠道。文中还指出了当前文献的优势、局限性、空白以及未来研究方向,这有助于指导未来所需的研究,以加强证据并确定进一步的实践举措,从而解决结肠镜检查肠道准备不佳的问题。

相似文献

1
Enhancing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: an integrative review.增强结肠镜检查的肠道准备:一项综合综述。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):36-44. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3182403413.
2
Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy through split-dose bowel preparation.通过分剂量肠道准备提高结肠镜检查质量。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2014 Mar-Apr;37(2):148-54. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000036.
3
[Bowel preparation : what's new ?].[肠道准备:有什么新进展?]
Tunis Med. 2012 Oct;90(10):676-9.
4
Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure.强化肠道清洁策略在结肠镜检查失败后的重复应用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1578-84. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823434c8.
5
Should the quality of preparation impact postcolonoscopy follow-up recommendations?结肠镜检查前准备的质量会影响结肠镜检查后的随访建议吗?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;102(12):2686-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01483.x.
6
A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy.一项评估一种新型、小剂量口服硫酸盐结肠镜检查肠道清洁制剂的安全性和有效性的随机临床研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Sep;104(9):2275-84. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.389. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
7
Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.不同的肠道准备方案在平均风险人群的筛查结肠镜检查中导致近端和非息肉样结直肠肿瘤的诊断率不同。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1570-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318231d667.
8
Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.结肠镜检查前口服分次聚乙二醇肠道准备:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.007.
9
Impact of patient education on quality of bowel preparation in outpatient colonoscopies.患者教育对门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备质量的影响。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(6):397-404.
10
Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality.肠道准备完成至结肠镜检查开始之间的间隔时间可预测肠道准备质量。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.047.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Health Literacy-directed Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Instruction Sheet.健康素养导向的结肠镜检查肠道准备说明书的影响
Am J Health Behav. 2017 May 1;41(3):301-308. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.41.3.9.
2
Using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data to assess colonoscopy quality outcomes of a web-enhanced implementation toolkit to support evidence-based practices for bowel preparation: a study protocol.使用中断时间序列数据的分段回归分析来评估网络增强实施工具包的结肠镜检查质量结果,以支持基于证据的肠道准备实践:一项研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2015 Jun 7;10:85. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0276-3.
3
Quality monitoring in colonoscopy: Time to act.
结肠镜检查中的质量监测:是时候采取行动了。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr 16;7(4):328-35. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.328.
4
Same-day colonoscopy preparation with Senna alkaloids and bisacodyl tablets: a pilot study.番泻叶生物碱与比沙可啶片用于结肠镜检查当日准备:一项试点研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15382-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15382.