Vaucher Paul, Bischoff Thomas, Diserens Esther-Amélie, Herzig Lilli, Meystre-Agustoni Giovanna, Panese Francesco, Favrat Bernard, Sass Catherine, Bodenmann Patrick
Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 3;2(1):e000692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000692. Print 2012.
Advances in biopsychosocial science have underlined the importance of taking social history and life course perspective into consideration in primary care. For both clinical and research purposes, this study aims to develop and validate a standardised instrument measuring both material and social deprivation at an individual level.
We identified relevant potential questions regarding deprivation using a systematic review, structured interviews, focus group interviews and a think-aloud approach. Item response theory analysis was then used to reduce the length of the 38-item questionnaire and derive the deprivation in primary care questionnaire (DiPCare-Q) index using data obtained from a random sample of 200 patients during their planned visits to an ambulatory general internal medicine clinic. Patients completed the questionnaire a second time over the phone 3 days later to enable us to assess reliability. Content validity of the DiPCare-Q was then assessed by 17 general practitioners. Psychometric properties and validity of the final instrument were investigated in a second set of patients. The DiPCare-Q was administered to a random sample of 1898 patients attending one of 47 different private primary care practices in western Switzerland along with questions on subjective social status, education, source of income, welfare status and subjective poverty.
Deprivation was defined in three distinct dimensions: material (eight items), social (five items) and health deprivation (three items). Item consistency was high in both the derivation (Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR20) =0.827) and the validation set (KR20 =0.778). The DiPCare-Q index was reliable (interclass correlation coefficients=0.847) and was correlated to subjective social status (r(s)=-0.539).
The DiPCare-Q is a rapid, reliable and validated instrument that may prove useful for measuring both material and social deprivation in primary care.
生物心理社会科学的进展凸显了在初级保健中考虑社会史和生命历程视角的重要性。出于临床和研究目的,本研究旨在开发并验证一种在个体层面测量物质和社会剥夺的标准化工具。
我们通过系统综述、结构化访谈、焦点小组访谈和出声思维法确定了与剥夺相关的潜在问题。然后使用项目反应理论分析来缩短这份包含38个条目的问卷长度,并利用从200名患者的随机样本在其计划就诊于门诊普通内科诊所期间获得的数据得出初级保健中的剥夺问卷(DiPCare-Q)指数。3天后,患者通过电话再次完成问卷,以便我们评估信度。然后由17名全科医生评估DiPCare-Q的内容效度。在另一组患者中研究最终工具的心理测量特性和效度。DiPCare-Q被施用于瑞士西部47家不同私人初级保健机构之一就诊的1898名患者的随机样本,同时还询问了关于主观社会地位、教育程度、收入来源、福利状况和主观贫困的问题。
剥夺被定义为三个不同维度:物质(8个条目)、社会(5个条目)和健康剥夺(3个条目)。在推导集(库德-理查森公式20(KR20)=0.827)和验证集(KR20 =0.778)中,条目一致性都很高。DiPCare-Q指数具有可靠性(组内相关系数=0.847),并且与主观社会地位相关(r(s)= -0.539)。
DiPCare-Q是一种快速、可靠且经过验证的工具,可能被证明对测量初级保健中的物质和社会剥夺有用。