• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中使用 Ikari 左引导导管的可行性。

Feasibility of transradial coronary angiography and intervention using a single Ikari left guiding catheter for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Jun;25(3):235-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00710.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00710.x
PMID:22308978
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) has been widely adopted in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients but there is limited literature on the use of a single catheter for both diagnostic angiography and intervention. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of TRI with a single Ikari left (IL) guiding catheter in STEMI patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 362 consecutive STEMI patients from August 2007 to December 2008. We assessed the feasibility of TRI with a single IL and compared this strategy with conventional transfemoral intervention (TFI) on the following outcomes: (1) door to perfusion time, (2) total procedural duration, (3) total fluoroscopy duration, and (4) major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by intention to treat analysis.

RESULTS

TRI was attempted in 185 patients. There were no failed radial cannulations. Overall success rate of primary TRI with a single IL was 96.9% and there were only 2 failures that required conversion to TFI. Compared to TFI, TRI with IL tended to a shorter median door to perfusion time, 90 (IQR 76.0 - 119.5) versus 98 (IQR 80.8 - 120.5) minutes (P = 0.07) and a shorter median procedure duration of 34 (IQR 27.0 - 45.0) versus 37 (IQR 28.0 - 49.3) minutes (P = 0.06). The median fluoroscopy duration was longer in the TRI group. MACE were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In experienced centers, TRI with a single IL catheter for STEMI is a feasible and effective approach and outcomes are comparable to conventional TFI.

摘要

背景

经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI)已广泛应用于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,但对于使用单一导管同时进行诊断性血管造影和介入治疗的文献报道有限。本研究旨在评估在 STEMI 患者中使用单一 Ikari 左(IL)导引导管进行 TRI 的可行性和结果。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2007 年 8 月至 2008 年 12 月期间连续 362 例 STEMI 患者。我们评估了使用单一 IL 进行 TRI 的可行性,并通过意向治疗分析比较了这种策略与传统经股动脉介入(TFI)的以下结果:(1)门到灌注时间,(2)总手术时间,(3)总透视时间,和(4)主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。

结果

共尝试了 185 例 TRI。无桡动脉穿刺失败。使用单一 IL 进行原发性 TRI 的总体成功率为 96.9%,仅 2 例需要转为 TFI。与 TFI 相比,IL 组的中位门到灌注时间更短,分别为 90(IQR 76.0-119.5)与 98(IQR 80.8-120.5)分钟(P=0.07),手术时间更短,分别为 34(IQR 27.0-45.0)与 37(IQR 28.0-49.3)分钟(P=0.06)。TRI 组的透视时间中位数较长。两组的 MACE 发生率相当。

结论

在经验丰富的中心,使用单一 IL 导管进行 STEMI 的 TRI 是一种可行且有效的方法,其结果与传统 TFI 相当。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of transradial coronary angiography and intervention using a single Ikari left guiding catheter for ST elevation myocardial infarction.经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中使用 Ikari 左引导导管的可行性。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Jun;25(3):235-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00710.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
2
Reducing needle-to-balloon time by using a single guiding catheter during transradial primary coronary intervention.经桡动脉行直接冠状动脉介入治疗中使用单根指引导管以减少球囊扩张时间。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Aug;25(4):330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00717.x. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
3
Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI).经桡动脉直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的真实世界可行性限制(TRAP-AMI)。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.024. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
4
Impact of a single universal guiding catheter on door-to-balloon time in primary transradial coronary intervention for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.单根通用指引导管对ST段抬高型心肌梗死经桡动脉行直接冠状动脉介入治疗中门球时间的影响。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017 Apr;32(2):114-119. doi: 10.1007/s12928-016-0395-z. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Transradial intervention for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock.经桡动脉入径介入治疗伴或不伴心原性休克的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E1-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24896. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
6
A single-center experience of transitioning from a routine transfemoral to a transradial intervention approach in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Impact on door-to-balloon time and clinical outcomes.单中心经验:从常规经股动脉到经桡动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的转变:对门球时间和临床结果的影响。
J Cardiol. 2013 Jul;62(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction?经桡动脉与经股动脉冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克:经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗是否适用于高危急性心肌梗死的急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 May;26(5):196-202.
8
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and high-risk patients: experience in a single centre without cardiothoracic surgical backup.经桡动脉入路行急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死及高危患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:无心胸外科支持的单中心经验。
Singapore Med J. 2011 Apr;52(4):257-62.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Using a Single Transradial MAC Guiding Catheter for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.使用单根桡动脉MAC引导导管对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的安全性与有效性
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Feb;30(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/joic.12346. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
10
Sheathless guide catheter in transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.无鞘导引导管在经桡动脉行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的应用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;87(6):1111-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26144. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Single Transradial Guiding Catheter in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Door-to-Balloon Optimized Strategy.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中使用单根桡动脉引导导管:一种门球时间优化策略。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 10;15(10):e46802. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46802. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Culprit vessel revascularization first with primary use of a dedicated transradial guiding catheter to reduce door to balloon time in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,首先对罪犯血管进行血运重建,主要使用专用的桡动脉引导导管以缩短门到球囊时间。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 28;9:1022488. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1022488. eCollection 2022.
3
The feasibility of Kimny guiding catheter for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Kimny引导导管用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死的可行性。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 Aug 23;34(1):102-106. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_27_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
4
Does reducing ischemia time justify to catheterize firstly the culprit artery in every primary PCI?缩短缺血时间是否足以证明在每例直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(primary PCI)中都应首先对罪犯血管进行导管插入术?
Heart Vessels. 2016 Jul;31(7):1022-9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0706-9. Epub 2015 Jun 26.