• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极的情绪背景消除了决策中的框架效应。

Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making.

机构信息

UMR 6232, CI-NAPS, CNRS, CEA, University of Caen & University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

出版信息

Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):926-31. doi: 10.1037/a0026788. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1037/a0026788
PMID:22309727
Abstract

Dual-process theories have suggested that emotion plays a key role in the framing effect in decision-making. However, little is known about the potential impact of a specific positive or negative emotional context on this bias. We investigated this question with adult participants using an emotional priming paradigm. First, participants were presented with positive or negative affective pictures (i.e., pleasant vs. unpleasant photographs). Afterward, participants had to perform a financial decision-making task that was unrelated to the pictures previously presented. The results revealed that the presentation framed in terms of gain or loss no longer affected subjects' decision-making following specific exposure to emotionally pleasant pictures. Interestingly, a positive emotional context did not globally influence risk-taking behavior but specifically decreased the risk propensity in the loss frame. This finding confirmed that a positive emotional context can reduce loss aversion, and it strongly reinforced the dual-process view that the framing effect stems from an affective heuristic belonging to intuitive System 1.

摘要

双过程理论认为,情绪在决策中的框架效应中起着关键作用。然而,对于特定的积极或消极情绪背景对这种偏差的潜在影响知之甚少。我们使用情绪启动范式调查了成年参与者的这个问题。首先,参与者会看到积极或消极的情绪图片(即愉快与不愉快的照片)。之后,参与者必须执行一个与之前呈现的图片无关的财务决策任务。结果表明,在特定地接触愉快的情绪图片后,以收益或损失来呈现的框架不再影响主体的决策。有趣的是,积极的情绪环境不会全局地影响冒险行为,而是特定地降低了在损失框架下的风险倾向。这一发现证实了积极的情绪环境可以减少损失厌恶,并且强烈支持了双重过程理论,即框架效应源于属于直觉系统 1 的情感启发式。

相似文献

1
Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making.积极的情绪背景消除了决策中的框架效应。
Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):926-31. doi: 10.1037/a0026788. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
2
I'm feeling lucky: the relationship between affect and risk-seeking in the framing effect.我感觉很幸运:框架效应中情感与风险寻求之间的关系。
Emotion. 2011 Aug;11(4):852-9. doi: 10.1037/a0022854.
3
Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame.恐惧和愤怒对收益框架中的风险寻求有相反的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 10;6:253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00253. eCollection 2015.
4
Effects of context on risk taking and decision times in obsessive-compulsive disorder.背景对强迫症中冒险行为和决策时间的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Apr;75:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
5
Role of affect in decision making.情感在决策中的作用。
Prog Brain Res. 2013;202:37-53. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00003-4.
6
Cognitive and emotional processing in high novelty seeking associated with the L-DRD4 genotype.与L-DRD4基因型相关的高新奇寻求中的认知和情感加工。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jun;47(7):1654-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
7
Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.框架效应与风险敏感决策。
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):83-97. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02047.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
8
The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses.空间距离变化对情绪反应的影响。
Emotion. 2008 Apr;8(2):192-8. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.192.
9
Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game.偶发性悲伤会影响最后通牒博弈中的社会经济决策。
Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):876-81. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.876.
10
The effect of accountability on loss aversion.问责制对损失厌恶的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Sep;132(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative news exposure does not affect risk or ambiguity aversion.负面新闻曝光不会影响风险规避或模糊规避。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1485346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1485346. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of promotional health message framing on the perceived benefit of mammography: evidence from estimation of willingness to pay.促进健康信息框架对乳房X光检查感知益处的影响:基于支付意愿估计的证据
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jun 21;44(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00970-8.
3
Taking the chance!-Interindividual differences in rule-breaking.
铤而走险!——打破规则的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0274837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274837. eCollection 2022.
4
Blame the Machine? Insights From an Experiment on Algorithm Aversion and Blame Avoidance in Computer-Aided Human Resource Management.该怪机器吗?计算机辅助人力资源管理中算法厌恶与责备规避实验的启示
Front Psychol. 2022 May 25;13:779028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779028. eCollection 2022.
5
Influence of Environmental Aesthetic Value and Anticipated Emotion on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An ERP Study.环境审美价值和预期情绪对亲环境行为的影响:一项 ERP 研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 7;19(9):5714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095714.
6
Moral Sensitivity and Emotional Intelligence in Intensive Care Unit Nurses.重症监护病房护士的道德敏感性与情商
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095132.
7
The relationship between adolescent risk perception and emotions during the COVID-19: a short-term longitudinal study.新冠疫情期间青少年风险认知与情绪的关系:一项短期纵向研究。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 4:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02860-2.
8
Impact of Induced Moods, Sensation Seeking, and Emotional Contagion on Economic Decisions Under Risk.诱导情绪、寻求刺激和情绪感染对风险下经济决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:796016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796016. eCollection 2021.
9
To Blame or Not? Modulating Third-Party Punishment with the Framing Effect.该责备吗?框架效应调节第三方惩罚。
Neurosci Bull. 2022 May;38(5):533-547. doi: 10.1007/s12264-021-00808-3. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
10
Replicating the Disease framing problem during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: A study of stress, worry, trust, and choice under risk.在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间复制疾病框架问题:一项关于风险下的压力、担忧、信任和选择的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257151. eCollection 2021.