Garcia Campos Luis S, Lempert Karolina M
Gordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, United States.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1485346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1485346. eCollection 2025.
Uncertain decisions can be risky (with known probabilities) or ambiguous (with unknown probabilities). Previous studies have found that negative affect can increase risk aversion and ambiguity aversion, but it is unknown if these effects generalize to more realistic negative stimuli. In real life, negative affect is frequently induced by exposure to news reports. Here, in two pre-registered studies, we examined how watching a negative news video influenced risk and ambiguity aversion.
Study 1 was conducted online in a sample of university students ( = 84), whereas Study 2 was done by a sample on Prolific ( = 229). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The negative news group viewed a news video about a car crash, while the control group watched a news video about train schedules. Then, all participants did a task in which, on each trial, they chose between a certain $5 reward or a gamble option. Half the gambles were risky (e.g., 50% chance of $10; 50% chance of $0), and half were ambiguous, so that the probabilities of the outcomes were not fully known.
Although participants who watched negative news reported a significant increase in negative affect, they did not differ from the neutral news group in their risk or ambiguity preferences.
These findings, when considered alongside other similar null findings in the literature, suggest that incidental negative affect might have no effect on decisions under uncertainty, unless the affect is misattributed to the choice itself.
不确定的决策可能有风险(概率已知)或模糊不清(概率未知)。先前的研究发现,消极情绪会增加风险厌恶和模糊厌恶,但尚不清楚这些影响是否能推广到更现实的负面刺激中。在现实生活中,接触新闻报道经常会引发消极情绪。在此,我们通过两项预先注册的研究,考察了观看负面新闻视频如何影响风险和模糊厌恶。
研究1在大学生样本(n = 84)中在线进行,而研究2由Prolific上的一个样本(n = 229)完成。参与者被随机分配到两个组中的一组。负面新闻组观看了一段关于车祸的新闻视频,而对照组观看了一段关于火车时刻表的新闻视频。然后,所有参与者完成一项任务,在每次试验中,他们要在确定的5美元奖励和一个赌博选项之间做出选择。一半的赌博是有风险的(例如,有50%的机会获得10美元;有50%的机会获得0美元),另一半是模糊的,即结果的概率不完全清楚。
尽管观看负面新闻的参与者报告消极情绪显著增加,但他们在风险或模糊偏好方面与中性新闻组没有差异。
这些发现,与文献中其他类似的零结果一起考虑时,表明偶然的消极情绪可能对不确定性下的决策没有影响,除非这种情绪被错误地归因于选择本身。