• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用MB11 BERAphone®并采用优化啁啾声进行声学刺激的基于听性脑干反应的新生儿听力筛查。

ABR-based newborn hearing screening with MB11 BERAphone® using an optimized chirp for acoustical stimulation.

作者信息

Cebulla Mario, Shehata-Dieler Wafaa

机构信息

Comprehensive Hearing Center (CHC), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Julius Maximilian-University Hospitals, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;76(4):536-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.01.012
PMID:22310071
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

At our center, the Maico MB11 BERAphone(®) device is used for newborn hearing screening based on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR). In 2006, an optimized chirp stimulus was implemented in the device to increase the reliability and quality of the screening method. In 2002, an automated response detection algorithm had been implemented. This study analyzes the screening results using the MB11 BERAphone(®) device with the implemented chirp stimulus and automated response detection method.

METHODS

The data presented were collected in the well-baby nursery as part of the newborn hearing screening program following a two stage screening protocol. To focus the study on the typical routine screening, data from at-risk babies were not included. Overall, data from 6866 babies (3604 males and 3262 females) screened from March 2006 to April 2011 were analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Out of the 6866 babies screened, 6607 passed bilaterally prior to hospital discharge (defined as 1st stage in this hearing screening program). Therefore, the pre-discharge pass rate of the hearing screening with the MB11 BERAphone(®) device was 96.2%. The resulting referral rate was 3.8%. The median test time per ear (excluding time for preparation and data reporting) was 28s with a range of 15-112s (5-95th percentile). The number of infants referred for 2nd stage, post-discharge re-screening was 259. Of this group, 71 passed bilaterally and 188 failed the re-screening in one or both ears. Therefore, including both the pre-discharge and post-discharge screening results, the bilateral pass rate was 97.3% and 2.7% were referred for diagnostic evaluation. Diagnostic testing was performed on all of the 188 infants who were referred. Results showed that 47 of these babies had hearing loss. This equates to a positive predictive value for a refer result of 25%. The observed prevalence of hearing impairment in our population was 0.684%. Diagnostic results for 141 of the referred newborns proved that they had normal hearing. That is, 141 out of 6866 newborns had a false-positive result with the MB11 BERAphone(®) screening. Therefore, the device had a specificity of 97.9%. During the time period of this study, no baby who passed the hearing screening was later found to have hearing impairment, suggesting a sensitivity of 100%. However, due to the limited number of newborns and the short time period after screening for the more recently screened babies, a reliable estimate of the sensitivity cannot be yet made from our program statistics. The theoretical sensitivity of the MB 11 device is 99.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Maico MB11 BERAphone(®) is a reliable device for auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening and it provides results within a very short time. Due to the implemented method for automatic detection of ABR, the use of the device does not require an experienced examiner, allowing it to be used by trained technicians in locations outside the department of audiology such as the well-baby nursery.

摘要

目的

在我们中心,迈科MB11听觉脑干反应测听仪(BERAphone®)用于基于听觉脑干反应(ABR)的新生儿听力筛查。2006年,该设备采用了优化的啁啾刺激,以提高筛查方法的可靠性和质量。2002年,已实施自动反应检测算法。本研究分析了使用带有已实施啁啾刺激和自动反应检测方法的MB11听觉脑干反应测听仪(BERAphone®)的筛查结果。

方法

所呈现的数据是在健康婴儿护理室收集的,作为新生儿听力筛查项目的一部分,遵循两阶段筛查方案。为使研究聚焦于典型的常规筛查,未纳入高危婴儿的数据。总体而言,本研究分析了2006年3月至2011年4月期间筛查的6866名婴儿(3604名男性和3262名女性)的数据。

结果

在筛查的6866名婴儿中,6607名在出院前双耳通过(在本听力筛查项目中定义为第一阶段)。因此,使用迈科MB11听觉脑干反应测听仪(BERAphone®)进行听力筛查的出院前通过率为96.2%。转诊率为3.8%。每只耳朵的中位测试时间(不包括准备和数据报告时间)为28秒,范围为15 - 112秒(第5 - 95百分位数)。转诊至第二阶段、出院后重新筛查的婴儿数量为259名。在这一组中,71名双耳通过,188名一只或两只耳朵重新筛查未通过。因此,包括出院前和出院后筛查结果,双耳通过率为97.3%,2.7%被转诊进行诊断评估。对所有188名被转诊的婴儿进行了诊断测试。结果显示,这些婴儿中有 47名有听力损失。这相当于转诊结果的阳性预测值为 25%。在我们的人群中观察到的听力障碍患病率为0.684%。对141名被转诊新生儿的诊断结果证明他们听力正常。也就是说,在6866名新生儿中,有141名使用迈科MB11听觉脑干反应测听仪(BERAphone®)筛查出现假阳性结果。因此,该设备的特异性为97.9%。在本研究期间,没有通过听力筛查的婴儿后来被发现有听力障碍,提示敏感性为100%。然而,由于新生儿数量有限以及对最近筛查婴儿筛查后的时间较短,我们项目的统计数据尚无法对敏感性做出可靠估计。MB11设备的理论敏感性为99.9%。

结论

迈科MB11听觉脑干反应测听仪(BERAphone®)是用于听觉脑干反应新生儿听力筛查的可靠设备,并且能在极短时间内提供结果。由于实施了自动检测ABR的方法,该设备的使用不需要经验丰富的检查人员,允许经过培训的技术人员在听力科以外的地点使用,如健康婴儿护理室。

相似文献

1
ABR-based newborn hearing screening with MB11 BERAphone® using an optimized chirp for acoustical stimulation.使用MB11 BERAphone®并采用优化啁啾声进行声学刺激的基于听性脑干反应的新生儿听力筛查。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;76(4):536-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
2
MB11 BERAphone and auditory brainstem response in newborns at audiologic risk: comparison of results.MB11型BERAphone与听力风险新生儿的听觉脑干反应:结果比较
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Aug;71(8):1175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 May 29.
3
MB11 BERAphone) hearing screening compared to ALGOportable in a Dutch NICU: a pilot study.荷兰新生儿重症监护病房中MB11 BERAphone听力筛查与ALGO便携式听力筛查的比较:一项试点研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Oct;74(10):1189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.020. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
4
Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.使用自动听性脑干反应和/或耳声发射测量法对目前可用的新生儿听力筛查设备进行比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Jul;68(7):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.02.008.
5
A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.一项关于有多少永久性听力损失婴儿通过两阶段耳声发射/自动听性脑干反应新生儿听力筛查方案的多中心评估。
Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):663-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1688.
6
Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.上海新生儿重症监护病房两种听力筛查方案的效果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Oct;75(10):1225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
7
Sensitivity of ABR based newborn screening with the MB11 BERAphone(®).基于MB11 BERAphone(®)的听性脑干反应新生儿筛查的敏感性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):756-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
8
The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.通过新生儿听力普遍筛查项目检测出的听神经病发病率
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Oct;72(10):1461-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
9
Comparison between MB11 BERAphone® and ALGO2e color for hearing screening in Japanese healthy newborns.MB11 BERAphone® 与 ALGO2e 彩色听力筛查在日本健康新生儿中的比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;144:110673. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110673. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.新生儿啁啾听性脑干反应的波形、潜伏期和波幅值评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;78(4):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of barriers and facilitators to early hearing detection and intervention in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省早期听力检测和干预障碍及促进因素分析。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2022 Jan 31;69(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v69i1.839.
2
[Duration of automated auditory brainstem response test for the initial hearing screening and influencing factors for the duration in neonates].[新生儿初次听力筛查自动听性脑干反应测试的时长及该时长的影响因素]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct;22(10):1085-1091. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2004194.
3
Frequency-Following Response with Speech Stimulus: Comparison between Two Methods of Stimulation.
语音刺激下的频率跟随反应:两种刺激方法的比较。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;23(4):e396-e402. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692160. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
4
[Preoperative auditory evaluation and postoperative follow-up in cochlear implantees : The role of objective measures].[人工耳蜗植入者的术前听觉评估与术后随访:客观测量的作用]
HNO. 2017 Apr;65(4):298-307. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0214-y.
5
Feasibility of newborn hearing screening in a public hospital setting in South Africa: A pilot study.南非一家公立医院开展新生儿听力筛查的可行性:一项试点研究。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2016;63(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v63i1.150. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
6
Evaluating reporting and process quality of publications on UNHS: a systematic review of programmes.评估普遍新生儿听力筛查相关出版物的报告质量和流程质量:对各项计划的系统评价
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Jul 22;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0404-x.
7
Challenges of Implementing Universal Newborn Hearing Screening at a Tertiary Care Centre from India.在印度一家三级医疗中心实施新生儿听力普遍筛查的挑战
Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Aug;82(8):688-93. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-1688-4. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
8
[Cochlear implants in children and adolescents].[儿童及青少年的人工耳蜗植入]
HNO. 2013 May;61(5):388-98. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2699-y.