Maffeo P A, Ford T W, Lavin P F
Tennessee Valley Authority.
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):249-62. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674064.
This study extends the literature on sex differences in depression to an employment setting, using Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; T and raw scores) and Depression (D) 30 measures. In contrast to previous findings, no gender differences remained on any of the measures after the effects of salary, age, education, and job classification had been taken into account. Findings replicated earlier results showing depressed males to have greater difficulty with concentration and motivation than depressed females. Data suggest that MMPI sex-based T-scores may overcorrect for sex differences in raw scores. Possible explanations for the findings are discussed, including a general improvement in women's well-being associated with changes in social conditions such as employment, or the possibility of a self-selection bias in our sample.
本研究使用明尼苏达多相人格量表(MMPI;T分数和原始分数)以及抑郁(D)30测量法,将关于抑郁症性别差异的文献扩展到就业环境中。与先前的研究结果不同,在考虑了薪资、年龄、教育程度和工作分类的影响后,任何一项测量中均未发现性别差异。研究结果重复了早期的结果,即抑郁的男性在注意力集中和动机方面比抑郁的女性有更大困难。数据表明,基于MMPI性别的T分数可能会过度校正原始分数中的性别差异。文中讨论了这些发现的可能解释,包括与就业等社会状况变化相关的女性幸福感普遍改善,或者我们样本中存在自我选择偏差的可能性。