Weinstock Alona, Oron-Gilad Tal, Parmet Yisrael
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:258-65. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0166-258.
Lack of system reliability has been repeatedly identified as a factor that decreases trust. However, aesthetics has an important role in the development of trust. Most of the research concerning the connection between aesthetics and trust focused on mobile commerce and websites while very little has been done in examining aesthetics in automated systems. This study integrated aesthetics manipulations into an imperfect in-vehicle automation system and focused on the power of aesthetics to decrease the negative effects of errors on trust, satisfaction, annoyance, and human-automation cooperation perceptions. Participants used the navigation system in either 100% or 85% accuracy levels with an aesthetic or non aesthetic system (4 conditions). In both aesthetic and non aesthetic systems, perceptions of trust, satisfaction and human automation cooperation were decreased in the imperfect system compared to the perfect one. However, in the annoyance rating, this trend was found only in the aesthetic system while in the non-aesthetic system no difference was found between the two levels of accuracy. This single effect may indicate upon the possibility that in automated systems aesthetics affects trust and satisfaction more moderately compared to mobile commerce applications and websites. However, more research is needed to assess this assumption.
系统可靠性的缺乏一再被认定为降低信任的一个因素。然而,美学在信任的发展中起着重要作用。大多数关于美学与信任之间联系的研究都集中在移动商务和网站上,而在研究自动化系统中的美学方面做得很少。本研究将美学操控整合到一个不完善的车载自动化系统中,并聚焦于美学减少错误对信任、满意度、烦恼以及人机自动化合作认知的负面影响的能力。参与者在100%或85%的准确率水平下使用具有美学或非美学设计的系统(共4种情况)。在美学系统和非美学系统中,与完美系统相比,不完善系统中的信任、满意度和人机自动化合作认知均有所下降。然而,在烦恼评级方面,这种趋势仅在美学系统中出现,而在非美学系统中,两种准确率水平之间未发现差异。这一单一效应可能表明,在自动化系统中,与移动商务应用和网站相比,美学对信任和满意度的影响更为适度。然而,需要更多研究来评估这一假设。