Suppr超能文献

不同类型的用户如何建立对技术的信任:对共享技术中主动和被动用户信任的前因进行定性分析。

How different types of users develop trust in technology: a qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology.

作者信息

Xu Jie, Le Kim, Deitermann Annika, Montague Enid

机构信息

University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Rubloff Building 10th Floor, 750 N Lake Shore, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 29.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the antecedents of trust in technology for active users and passive users working with a shared technology. According to the prominence-interpretation theory, to assess the trustworthiness of a technology, a person must first perceive and evaluate elements of the system that includes the technology. An experimental study was conducted with 54 participants who worked in two-person teams in a multi-task environment with a shared technology. Trust in technology was measured using a trust in technology questionnaire and antecedents of trust were elicited using an open-ended question. A list of antecedents of trust in technology was derived using qualitative analysis techniques. The following categories emerged from the antecedent: technology factors, user factors, and task factors. Similarities and differences between active users and passive user responses, in terms of trust in technology were discussed.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查主动用户和使用共享技术的被动用户对技术信任的影响因素。根据显著性-解释理论,为了评估一项技术的可信度,一个人必须首先感知和评估包含该技术的系统要素。我们进行了一项实验研究,54名参与者在多任务环境中以两人一组的形式使用共享技术工作。使用技术信任问卷来衡量对技术的信任,并通过一个开放式问题来引出信任的影响因素。利用定性分析技术得出了技术信任影响因素的列表。从这些影响因素中出现了以下几类:技术因素、用户因素和任务因素。讨论了主动用户和被动用户在技术信任方面的反应的异同。

相似文献

4
Effects of Information Availability on Command-and-Control Decision Making: Performance, Trust, and Situation Awareness.
Hum Factors. 2016 Mar;58(2):301-21. doi: 10.1177/0018720815619515. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
The impact of self-avatars on trust and collaboration in shared virtual environments.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189078. eCollection 2017.
8
In search of reflective behavior and shared understanding in ad hoc expert teams.
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Apr;7(2):141-54. doi: 10.1089/109493104323024410.
10
Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces.
Ergonomics. 2019 Mar;62(3):345-360. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1547842. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: a framework to support 'mesoergonomic' inquiry.
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 May 24.
4
A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction.
Hum Factors. 2011 Oct;53(5):517-27. doi: 10.1177/0018720811417254.
5
Affective processes in human-automation interactions.
Hum Factors. 2011 Aug;53(4):356-70. doi: 10.1177/0018720811411912.
6
Effect of descriptive information and experience on automation reliance.
Hum Factors. 2011 Jun;53(3):230-44. doi: 10.1177/0018720811406725.
7
Validation of a trust in medical technology instrument.
Appl Ergon. 2010 Oct;41(6):812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
8
Humans: still vital after all these years of automation.
Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):511-20. doi: 10.1518/001872008X312198.
10
Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Oct;16(5):445-51. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.445.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验