Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Ontario, Canada.
Amyloid. 2012 Mar;19(1):5-14. doi: 10.3109/13506129.2011.654294. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
Serum amyloid A (SAA), a protein originally of interest primarily to investigators focusing on AA amyloidogenesis, has become a subject of interest to a very broad research community. SAA is still a major amyloid research topic because AA amyloid, for which SAA is the precursor, is the prototypic model of in vivo amyloidogenesis and much that has been learned with this model has been applicable to much more common clinical types of amyloid. However, SAA has also become a subject of considerable interest to those studying (i) the synthesis and regulation of acute phase proteins, of which SAA is a prime example, (ii) the role that SAA plays in tissue injury and inflammation, a situation in which the plasma concentration of SAA may increase a 1000-fold, (iii) the influence that SAA has on HDL structure and function, because during inflammation the majority of SAA is an apolipoprotein of HDL, (iv) the influence that SAA may have on HDL's role in reverse cholesterol transport, and therefore, (v) SAA's potential role in atherogenesis. However, no physiological role for SAA, among many proposed, has been widely accepted. None the less from an evolutionary perspective SAA must have a critical physiological function conferring survival-value because SAA genes have existed for at least 500 million years and SAA's amino acid sequence has been substantially conserved. An examination of the published literature over the last 40 years reveals a great deal of conflicting data and interpretation. Using SAA's conserved amino acid sequence and the physiological effects it has while in its native structure, namely an HDL apolipoprotein, we argue that much of the confounding data and interpretation relates to experimental pitfalls not appreciated when working with SAA, a failure to appreciate the value of physiologic studies done in the 1970-1990 and a current major focus on putative roles of SAA in atherogenesis and chronic disease. When viewed from an evolutionary perspective, published data suggest that acute-phase SAA is part of a systemic response to injury to recycle and reuse cholesterol from destroyed and damaged cells. This is accomplished through SAA's targeted delivery of HDL to macrophages, and its suppression of ACAT, the enhancement of neutral cholesterol esterase and ABC transporters in macrophages. The recycling of cholesterol during serious injury, when dietary intake is restricted and there is an immediate and critical requirement of cholesterol in the generation of myriads of cells involved in inflammation and repair responses, is likely SAA's important survival role. Data implicating SAA in atherogenesis are not relevant to its evolutionary role. Furthermore, in apoE(-/-) mice, domains near the N- and C- termini of SAA inhibit the initiation and progression of aortic lipid lesions illustrating the conflicting nature of these two sets of data.
血清淀粉样蛋白 A(SAA)最初主要是研究 AA 淀粉样变性的研究人员关注的蛋白,但现在已成为非常广泛的研究领域的关注对象。SAA 仍然是淀粉样研究的主要课题,因为 AA 淀粉样蛋白是 SAA 的前体,是体内淀粉样形成的典型模型,并且该模型所学到的很多知识都适用于更常见的临床类型的淀粉样蛋白。但是,SAA 也成为了研究(i)急性相蛋白的合成和调节的重要对象,SAA 就是其中的主要范例,(ii)SAA 在组织损伤和炎症中的作用,在这种情况下,SAA 的血浆浓度可能增加 1000 倍,(iii)SAA 对 HDL 结构和功能的影响,因为在炎症期间,SAA 主要是 HDL 的载脂蛋白,(iv)SAA 对 HDL 逆胆固醇转运作用的影响,因此,(v)SAA 在动脉粥样硬化形成中的潜在作用。但是,SAA 有许多假设的生理作用,尚未被广泛接受。尽管如此,从进化的角度来看,SAA 必须具有关键的生理功能,因为 SAA 基因至少存在了 5 亿年,而且 SAA 的氨基酸序列已经得到了很大的保存。对过去 40 年发表的文献进行的检查揭示了大量相互矛盾的数据和解释。使用 SAA 保守的氨基酸序列以及其在天然结构中具有的生理作用,即 HDL 载脂蛋白,我们认为,许多混淆的数据和解释都与在使用 SAA 时未被认识到的实验陷阱有关,未能认识到 20 世纪 70 年代至 90 年代进行的生理学研究的价值,以及当前对 SAA 在动脉粥样硬化和慢性疾病中潜在作用的主要关注。从进化的角度来看,已发表的数据表明,急性期 SAA 是全身对受损细胞进行损伤修复的系统反应的一部分,可从被破坏和受损的细胞中回收和再利用胆固醇。这是通过 SAA 将 HDL 靶向递送至巨噬细胞来实现的,并且 SAA 抑制 ACAT,增强巨噬细胞中的中性胆固醇酯酶和 ABC 转运蛋白。在严重损伤期间,当饮食摄入受到限制并且在炎症和修复反应中涉及的成百上千个细胞的生成中急需胆固醇时,胆固醇的回收可能是 SAA 发挥重要的生存作用。将 SAA 牵连到动脉粥样硬化中的数据与它的进化作用无关。此外,在 apoE(-/-)小鼠中,SAA 的 N-和 C-末端附近的结构域抑制主动脉脂质病变的起始和进展,这说明了这两组数据的矛盾性质。