Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01273.x.
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care is time-dependent. Many STEMI patients require interhospital helicopter transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if ground emergency medical services (EMS) initially transport the patient to a non-PCI center. This investigation models potential time savings of ground EMS requests for helicopter EMS (HEMS) transport of a STEMI patient directly to a PCI center, rather than usual transport to a local hospital with subsequent transfer.
Data from a multicenter retrospective chart review of STEMI patients transferred for primary PCI by a single HEMS agency over 12 months were used to model medical contact to balloon times (MCTB) for two scenarios: a direct-to-scene HEMS response and hospital rendezvous after ground EMS initiation of transfer.
Actual MCTB median time for 36 hospital-initiated transfers was 160 minutes (range = 116 to 321 minutes). Scene response MCTB median time was estimated as 112 minutes (range = 69 to 187 minutes). The difference in medians was 48 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] = 33 to 62 minutes). Hospital rendezvous MCTB median time was estimated as 113 minutes (range = 74 to 187 minutes). The difference in medians was 47 minutes (95% CI = 32 to 62 minutes). No patient had an actual MCTB time of less than 90 minutes; in the scene response and hospital rendezvous scenarios, 2 of 36 (6%) and 3 of 36 (8%), respectively, would have had MCTB times under 90 minutes.
In this setting, ground EMS initiation of HEMS transfers for STEMI patients has the potential to reduce MCTB time, but most patients will still not achieve MCTB time of less than 90 minutes.
ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的治疗具有时间依赖性。如果地面紧急医疗服务(EMS)最初将患者送往非经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中心,则许多 STEMI 患者需要通过直升机转院进行 PCI。本研究模拟了直接将 STEMI 患者通过地面 EMS 请求直升机 EMS(HEMS)转运至 PCI 中心,而不是常规转运至当地医院再进行转院,以节约潜在的时间。
本研究使用了来自一家多中心回顾性图表审查的 12 个月内由单一 HEMS 机构转运进行直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者的数据,以模拟两种方案的医疗接触球囊时间(MCTB):直接现场 HEMS 响应和在地面 EMS 启动转院后在医院会合。
36 例医院发起的转院实际 MCTB 中位数时间为 160 分钟(范围= 116 至 321 分钟)。现场响应 MCTB 中位数时间估计为 112 分钟(范围= 69 至 187 分钟)。中位数差异为 48 分钟(95%置信区间[CI] = 33 至 62 分钟)。医院会合 MCTB 中位数时间估计为 113 分钟(范围= 74 至 187 分钟)。中位数差异为 47 分钟(95% CI = 32 至 62 分钟)。没有患者的实际 MCTB 时间少于 90 分钟;在现场响应和医院会合场景中,分别有 2/36(6%)和 3/36(8%)的患者 MCTB 时间将少于 90 分钟。
在这种情况下,地面 EMS 启动 STEMI 患者的 HEMS 转运会有降低 MCTB 时间的潜力,但大多数患者仍无法实现少于 90 分钟的 MCTB 时间。