• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ground emergency medical services requests for helicopter transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients decrease medical contact to balloon times in rural and suburban settings.在农村和郊区环境中,地面紧急医疗服务请求直升机转院治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者可减少与球囊接触的医疗时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01273.x.
2
Clinical pathway: helicopter scene STEMI protocol to facilitate long-distance transfer for primary PCI.临床路径:直升机转运ST段抬高型心肌梗死方案以促进直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长途转运
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012 Dec;11(4):193-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e318261c995.
3
Reducing Door-in Door-out Intervals in Helicopter ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Interhospital Transfers.缩短直升机转运 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院际转运的门到门时间间隔
Air Med J. 2017 Sep-Oct;36(5):244-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
4
Reperfusion is delayed beyond guideline recommendations in patients requiring interhospital helicopter transfer for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.在需要进行院间直升机转院治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的患者中,再灌注延迟超过指南建议。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):213-220.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.031. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
5
Earlier reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by use of helicopter. 采用直升机对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行早期再灌注。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Oct 4;20:70. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-70.
6
Does helicopter transport delay prehospital transfer for STEMI patients in rural areas? Findings from the CRAC France PCI registry.直升机转运是否会延迟农村地区 STEMI 患者的院前转运?来自法国 CRAC PCI 登记处的研究结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):958-965. doi: 10.1177/2048872619848976. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
7
Helicopter transport effectiveness of patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直升机转运患者进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性
Air Med J. 2013 May-Jun;32(3):144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2012.08.007.
8
Relationship of the distance between non-PCI hospitals and primary PCI centers, mode of transport, and reperfusion time among ground and air interhospital transfers using NCDR's ACTION Registry-GWTG: a report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program.利用 NCDR 的 ACTION 注册-GWTG 研究:美国心脏协会生命线计划的报告,探讨非 PCI 医院与初级 PCI 中心之间的距离、转运方式和地面与空中医院间转运的再灌注时间之间的关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(6):797-805. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001307. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者转运时间和护理流程:卡罗莱纳州急诊室急性心肌梗死再灌注经验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):555-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968461. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
10
Effect of Emergency Medical Service Use and Inter-hospital Transfer on Time to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter Observational Study.急诊医疗服务使用及院间转运对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的影响:一项多中心观察性研究
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):66-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1056892.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Delayed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for STEMI in the Southeast United States.美国东南部 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者延迟进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的风险
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 12:2024.07.11.24310307. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.11.24310307.
2
National Trends in Emergency Department Care Processes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2005 to 2015.美国 2005 年至 2015 年期间,急诊部门对急性心肌梗死的治疗流程的国家趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(20):e017208. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017208. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Emergency Department Telemedicine Consults are Associated with Faster Time-to-Electrocardiogram and Time-to-Fibrinolysis for Myocardial Infarction Patients.急诊科远程医疗会诊与心肌梗死患者更快获得心电图检查及更快接受纤溶治疗相关。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Dec;26(12):1440-1448. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0273. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) Response in Rural Areas in Poland: Retrospective Study.波兰农村地区的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)反应:回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;16(9):1532. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091532.
5
Estimated Impact of Emergency Medical Service Triage of Stroke Patients on Comprehensive Stroke Centers: An Urban Population-Based Study.急诊医疗服务对卒中患者进行分诊对综合卒中中心的预估影响:一项基于城市人口的研究。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2164-2170. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015971. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Achieving timely percutaneous reperfusion for rural ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients by direct transport to an urban PCI-hospital.通过直接转运至城市PCI医院,为农村ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者实现及时的经皮再灌注治疗。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):840-845. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.10.012.
7
Design and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity: Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale.用于预测卒中严重程度的院前量表的设计与验证:辛辛那提院前卒中严重程度量表
Stroke. 2015 Jun;46(6):1508-12. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008804. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
8
Timeliness of interfacility transfer for ED patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊患者机构间转运的及时性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):423-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.067. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Paramedic contact to balloon in less than 90 minutes: a successful strategy for st-segment elevation myocardial infarction bypass to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a canadian emergency medical system.急救员在 90 分钟内接触到球囊:加拿大急救医疗系统中 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成功策略。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):490-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.598613. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
2
Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.门到门时间与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者再灌注延迟和结局的关系。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 22;305(24):2540-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.862.
3
Safe transport of patients with acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock by skilled air medical crews.熟练的航空医疗人员安全转运急性冠状动脉综合征或心源性休克患者。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):240-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.541978. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
4
Part 10: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第十部分:急性冠状动脉综合征:2010 年美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理指南。
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S787-817. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971028.
5
Reperfusion is delayed beyond guideline recommendations in patients requiring interhospital helicopter transfer for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.在需要进行院间直升机转院治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的患者中,再灌注延迟超过指南建议。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):213-220.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.031. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
6
System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗的 STEMI 患者的系统延迟与死亡率。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):763-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1139.
7
Association between timeliness of reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注治疗时机与临床结局的相关性。
JAMA. 2010 Jun 2;303(21):2148-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.712.
8
Air ambulance transport times and advanced cardiac life support interventions during the interfacility transfer of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.空中救护车转运时间与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院间转运中实施的高级心脏生命支持干预。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):292-9. doi: 10.3109/10903121003760192.
9
Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗后的常规早期血管成形术。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 25;360(26):2705-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808276.
10
Integration of pre-hospital electrocardiograms and ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving center (SRC) networks: impact on Door-to-Balloon times across 10 independent regions.院前心电图与ST段抬高型心肌梗死接收中心(SRC)网络的整合:对10个独立地区门球时间的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr;2(4):339-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.11.013.

在农村和郊区环境中,地面紧急医疗服务请求直升机转院治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者可减少与球囊接触的医疗时间。

Ground emergency medical services requests for helicopter transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients decrease medical contact to balloon times in rural and suburban settings.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01273.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01273.x
PMID:22320366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3278852/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care is time-dependent. Many STEMI patients require interhospital helicopter transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if ground emergency medical services (EMS) initially transport the patient to a non-PCI center. This investigation models potential time savings of ground EMS requests for helicopter EMS (HEMS) transport of a STEMI patient directly to a PCI center, rather than usual transport to a local hospital with subsequent transfer.

METHODS

Data from a multicenter retrospective chart review of STEMI patients transferred for primary PCI by a single HEMS agency over 12 months were used to model medical contact to balloon times (MCTB) for two scenarios: a direct-to-scene HEMS response and hospital rendezvous after ground EMS initiation of transfer.

RESULTS

Actual MCTB median time for 36 hospital-initiated transfers was 160 minutes (range = 116 to 321 minutes). Scene response MCTB median time was estimated as 112 minutes (range = 69 to 187 minutes). The difference in medians was 48 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] = 33 to 62 minutes). Hospital rendezvous MCTB median time was estimated as 113 minutes (range = 74 to 187 minutes). The difference in medians was 47 minutes (95% CI = 32 to 62 minutes). No patient had an actual MCTB time of less than 90 minutes; in the scene response and hospital rendezvous scenarios, 2 of 36 (6%) and 3 of 36 (8%), respectively, would have had MCTB times under 90 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this setting, ground EMS initiation of HEMS transfers for STEMI patients has the potential to reduce MCTB time, but most patients will still not achieve MCTB time of less than 90 minutes.

摘要

目的

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的治疗具有时间依赖性。如果地面紧急医疗服务(EMS)最初将患者送往非经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中心,则许多 STEMI 患者需要通过直升机转院进行 PCI。本研究模拟了直接将 STEMI 患者通过地面 EMS 请求直升机 EMS(HEMS)转运至 PCI 中心,而不是常规转运至当地医院再进行转院,以节约潜在的时间。

方法

本研究使用了来自一家多中心回顾性图表审查的 12 个月内由单一 HEMS 机构转运进行直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者的数据,以模拟两种方案的医疗接触球囊时间(MCTB):直接现场 HEMS 响应和在地面 EMS 启动转院后在医院会合。

结果

36 例医院发起的转院实际 MCTB 中位数时间为 160 分钟(范围= 116 至 321 分钟)。现场响应 MCTB 中位数时间估计为 112 分钟(范围= 69 至 187 分钟)。中位数差异为 48 分钟(95%置信区间[CI] = 33 至 62 分钟)。医院会合 MCTB 中位数时间估计为 113 分钟(范围= 74 至 187 分钟)。中位数差异为 47 分钟(95% CI = 32 至 62 分钟)。没有患者的实际 MCTB 时间少于 90 分钟;在现场响应和医院会合场景中,分别有 2/36(6%)和 3/36(8%)的患者 MCTB 时间将少于 90 分钟。

结论

在这种情况下,地面 EMS 启动 STEMI 患者的 HEMS 转运会有降低 MCTB 时间的潜力,但大多数患者仍无法实现少于 90 分钟的 MCTB 时间。