• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

熟练的航空医疗人员安全转运急性冠状动脉综合征或心源性休克患者。

Safe transport of patients with acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock by skilled air medical crews.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):240-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.541978. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

DOI:10.3109/10903127.2010.541978
PMID:21226552
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a spectrum of disease that includes unstable angina (UA), non?ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Cardiogenic shock is a severe complication of an ACS. Evidence suggests that emergent primary coronary intervention is the treatment of choice for patients with acute STEMI, and patients who have hemodynamic instability or suffer a major complication of therapy also require emergent intervention. These patients may require emergent interfacility transfer for this intervention.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined ACS patient transfers to determine the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during transfer in a large transport medicine service.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for air medical transfer of ACS or cardiogenic shock patients in Ontario, Canada, from January 2005 to June 2007. Call records and patient care reports were screened for AE identifiers, including resuscitation medication and procedure and unstable cardiac rhythms. Each chart with an AE was independently reviewed by two investigators, with consensus in cases of disagreement, to determine the incidence and type of AE.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 2,258 transfers for which the patient had a primary diagnosis of ACS or cardiogenic shock. The mean age was 62 years (range 24-91 years), and 68% of the patients were male. Investigators identified one or more AEs that occurred during 127 (5.6%) patient transfers, with hypotension (n = 80), increasing chest pain (n = 52), and arrhythmia (n = 18) as the three most common AEs. There was one death in flight. Management of the AEs was within the scope of practice of transport personnel in all but one case.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of AEs in air medical transport of ACS patients is low. Air medical crews can safely transport this potentially unstable patient population.

摘要

介绍

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是一种疾病谱,包括不稳定型心绞痛(UA)、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)。心原性休克是 ACS 的严重并发症。有证据表明,对于急性 STEMI 患者,紧急进行原发性冠状动脉介入治疗是首选治疗方法,而那些存在血流动力学不稳定或发生治疗重大并发症的患者也需要紧急介入治疗。这些患者可能需要紧急进行医院间转运以接受这种干预。

目的

本研究调查了 ACS 患者的转运情况,以确定在一个大型转运医学服务中转运过程中不良事件(AE)的发生率。

方法

这是对加拿大安大略省 2005 年 1 月至 2007 年 6 月间进行的 ACS 或心原性休克患者空中医疗转运的前瞻性采集数据进行的回顾性研究。通过呼叫记录和患者护理报告筛选 AE 标识符,包括复苏药物和程序以及不稳定的心脏节律。对于每个有 AE 的病历,均由两名调查员独立进行审查,如果存在分歧,则由两人共同决定,以确定 AE 的发生率和类型。

结果

在研究期间,有 2258 次转运的患者被诊断为 ACS 或心原性休克。平均年龄为 62 岁(范围 24-91 岁),68%的患者为男性。研究人员在 127 次(5.6%)患者转运中发现了一个或多个 AE,其中低血压(n = 80)、胸痛加剧(n = 52)和心律失常(n = 18)是最常见的三种 AE。在飞行过程中有一例死亡。除了一例之外,所有 AE 的处理均在转运人员的实践范围内。

结论

ACS 患者空中医疗转运中 AE 的发生率较低。空中医疗人员可以安全地转运这一潜在不稳定的患者群体。

相似文献

1
Safe transport of patients with acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock by skilled air medical crews.熟练的航空医疗人员安全转运急性冠状动脉综合征或心源性休克患者。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):240-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.541978. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
2
API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病管理的API专家共识文件
J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80.
3
Patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and without chest pain are treated less aggressively and experience higher in-hospital mortality.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死且无胸痛的患者治疗不够积极,住院死亡率更高。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Jul;65(7):769-75; discussion 776-7.
4
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术可提高急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后发生心源性休克的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的生存率:一项倾向评分分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;138(6):1326-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.038. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
5
Patterns of presentation and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床表现模式及预后
Cardiology. 2009;113(3):198-206. doi: 10.1159/000201273. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
6
Demographic, management practices and in-hospital outcomes of Thai Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry (TACSR): the difference from the Western world.泰国急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(TACSR)的人口统计学、管理实践及院内结局:与西方世界的差异
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90 Suppl 1:1-11.
7
Air ambulance transport times and advanced cardiac life support interventions during the interfacility transfer of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.空中救护车转运时间与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院间转运中实施的高级心脏生命支持干预。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):292-9. doi: 10.3109/10903121003760192.
8
Management of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation in district hospitals without catheterisation laboratory--Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry of Małopolska 2002-2003.2002 - 2003年小波兰省急性冠状动脉综合征登记处:无导管实验室的地区医院中ST段抬高型心肌梗死的管理
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Oct;64(10):1053-60; discussion 1061-2.
9
[Cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome--therapeutic approach].[急性冠状动脉综合征中的心源性休克——治疗方法]
Acta Med Croatica. 2004;58(2):101-6.
10
Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS). Characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Poland.波兰急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(PL-ACS)。波兰急性冠状动脉综合征患者的特征、治疗及预后。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Aug;65(8):861-72; discussion 873-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking back to inform the future: a review of published paramedicine research.回顾过去,展望未来:已发表的护理研究综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08893-4.
2
Complication during transportation and 30 days mortality of patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者在转运过程中的并发症和 30 天死亡率。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jan 17;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01327-1.
3
Outcomes of Physician-Staffed Versus Non-Physician-Staffed Helicopter Transport for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
由医生配备人员与非医生配备人员的直升机转运用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死的结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 2;6(2):e004936. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004936.
4
Ground emergency medical services requests for helicopter transfer of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients decrease medical contact to balloon times in rural and suburban settings.在农村和郊区环境中,地面紧急医疗服务请求直升机转院治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者可减少与球囊接触的医疗时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01273.x.
5
Pro/con debate: do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport?正反方辩论:区域集中化危重病治疗的益处是否超过了患者在机构间转运的风险?
Crit Care. 2009;13(4):219. doi: 10.1186/cc7883. Epub 2009 Aug 10.