Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e669-77. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17828.
To evaluate the bond stability of resin cements when luted to glass-reinforced alumina and zirconia CAD/CAM dental ceramics.
Eighteen glass-infiltrated alumina and eighteen densely sintered zirconia blocks were randomly conditioned as follows: Group 1: No treatment; Group 2: Sandblasting (125 µm Al₂O₃-particles); and Group 3: Silica-coating (50 µm silica-modified Al₂O₃-particles). Composite samples were randomly bonded to the pretreated ceramic surfaces using different resin cements: Subgroup 1: Clearfil Esthetic Cement (CEC); Subgroup 2: RelyX Unicem (RXU); and Subgroup 3: Calibra (CAL). After 24 h, bonded specimens were cut into 1 ± 0.1 mm² sticks. One-half of the beams were tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). The remaining one-half was immersed in 10 % NaOCl aqueous solution (NaOClaq) for 5 h before testing. The fracture pattern and morphology of the debonded surfaces were assessed with a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM). A multiple ANOVA was conducted to analyze the contributions of ceramic composition, surface treatment, resin cement type, and chemical challenging to MTBS. The Tukey test was run for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
After 24 h, CEC luted to pre-treated zirconia achieved the highest MTBS. Using RXU, alumina and zirconia registered comparable MTBS. CAL failed prematurely, except when luted to sandblasted zirconia. After NaOClaq storage, CEC significantly lowered MTBS when luted to zirconia or alumina. RXU decreased MTBS only when bonded to silica-coated alumina. CAL recorded 100 % of pre-testing failures. Micromorphological alterations were evident after NaOClaq immersion.
Resin-ceramic interfacial longevity depended on cement selection rather than on surface pre-treatments. The MDP-containing and the self-adhesive resin cements were both suitable for luting CAD/CAM ceramics. Despite both cements being prone to degradation, RXU luted to zirconia or untreated or sandblasted alumina showed the most stable interfaces. CAL experimented spontaneous debonding in all tested groups.
评估树脂水门汀黏结于玻璃纤维增强氧化铝和氧化锆 CAD/CAM 牙科陶瓷的黏结稳定性。
将 18 个玻璃渗透氧化铝和 18 个致密烧结氧化锆块随机分为以下三组:第 1 组:不处理;第 2 组:喷砂(125μmAl₂O₃ 颗粒);第 3 组:硅涂层(50μm 硅改性 Al₂O₃ 颗粒)。使用不同的树脂水门汀将复合材料样本随机黏结到预处理陶瓷表面:第 1 亚组:Clearfil Esthetic Cement(CEC);第 2 亚组:RelyX Unicem(RXU);第 3 亚组:Calibra(CAL)。24 h 后,将黏结的样本切割成 1±0.1mm²的棒状。将一半的梁用于测试微拉伸黏结强度(MTBS)。另一半梁在测试前浸入 10% NaOCl 水溶液(NaOClaq)中 5 h。使用场发射枪扫描电子显微镜(FEG-SEM)评估离解表面的断裂模式和形态。采用多变量方差分析来分析陶瓷成分、表面处理、树脂水门汀类型和化学挑战对 MTBS 的影响。进行 Tukey 检验进行多重比较(p<0.05)。
在 24 h 后,CEC 黏结预处理氧化锆时获得了最高的 MTBS。使用 RXU,氧化铝和氧化锆的 MTBS 相当。CAL 除了黏结喷砂氧化锆外,均提前失效。在 NaOClaq 储存后,CEC 黏结氧化锆或氧化铝时 MTBS 显著降低。RXU 仅当黏结硅涂层氧化铝时 MTBS 降低。CAL 记录了 100%的预测试失败。NaOClaq 浸泡后出现明显的微观形态改变。
树脂-陶瓷界面的耐久性取决于黏结剂的选择,而不是表面预处理。含 MDP 的自黏结树脂水门汀均适用于黏结 CAD/CAM 陶瓷。尽管两种黏结剂都容易降解,但 RXU 黏结氧化锆或未处理或喷砂氧化铝时表现出最稳定的界面。CAL 在所有测试组中均出现自发离解。