Petrauskas Anderson, Novaes Olivieri Karina Andrea, Pupo Yasmine Mendes, Berger Guilherme, Gonçalves Betiol Ederson Áureo
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;21(2):198-204. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_190_17.
This study aims to evaluate the microshear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics with different resin cement systems and surface treatments.
Forty blocks of zirconia-based ceramic were prepared and embedded in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes with acrylic resin. After polishing, the samples were washed in an ultrasonic bath and dried in an oven for 10 min. Half of the samples were subjected to sandblasting with aluminum oxide. Blocks were divided into four groups ( = 10) in which two resin cements were used as follows: (1) RelyX™ U100 with surface-polished zirconia; (2) RelyX™ U100 with surface-blasted zirconia; (3) Multilink with surface-polished zirconia; and 4) Multilink with surface-blasted zirconia. After performing these surface treatments, translucent tubes ( = 30 per group) were placed on the zirconia specimens, and resin cement was injected into them and light cured. The PVC tubes were adapted in a universal testing machine; a stiletto blade, which was bolted to the machine, was positioned on the cementation interface. The microshear test was performed at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure mode was analyzed in an optical microscope and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.
The null hypothesis of this study was rejected because there was a difference found between the resin cement and the surface treatment. There was a statistical difference ( < 0.005) in RelyX™ U100 with surface-blasted zirconia, in relation to the other three groups. For Multilink groups, there was no statistical difference between them.
Self-adhesive resin cement showed a more significant tendency toward bond strength in the ceramic-based zirconium oxide grit-blasted surfaces.
本研究旨在评估不同树脂水门汀系统和表面处理的氧化锆基陶瓷的微剪切粘结强度。
制备40块氧化锆基陶瓷块,并用丙烯酸树脂嵌入聚氯乙烯(PVC)管中。抛光后,样品在超声浴中清洗,并在烘箱中干燥10分钟。一半样品用氧化铝喷砂处理。将陶瓷块分为四组(每组n = 10),使用两种树脂水门汀如下:(1)表面抛光氧化锆的RelyX™ U100;(2)表面喷砂氧化锆的RelyX™ U100;(3)表面抛光氧化锆的Multilink;以及(4)表面喷砂氧化锆的Multilink。进行这些表面处理后,将半透明管(每组n = 30)放置在氧化锆试样上,并注入树脂水门汀并光固化。将PVC管安装在万能试验机上;将用螺栓固定在试验机上的细高跟鞋刀片放置在粘结界面上。以0.5 mm/min的速度进行微剪切试验。在光学显微镜下分析失效模式,并分类为粘结、内聚或混合。
本研究的零假设被拒绝,因为在树脂水门汀和表面处理之间发现了差异。与其他三组相比,表面喷砂氧化锆的RelyX™ U100存在统计学差异(P < 0.005)。对于Multilink组,它们之间没有统计学差异。
自粘结树脂水门汀在基于陶瓷的氧化锆喷砂表面显示出更显著的粘结强度趋势。