• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机构审查委员会(IRB)与临床研究中的伦理问题。

Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jan;62(1):3-12. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.3. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

DOI:10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.3
PMID:22323947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3272525/
Abstract

Clinical research has expanded tremendously in the past few decades and consequently there has been growing interest in the ethical guidelines that are being followed for the protection of human subjects. This review summarizes historical scandals and social responses chronologically from World War II to the Death of Ellen Roche (2001) to emphasize the lessons we must learn from history. International ethical guidelines for studies with human subjects are also briefly described in order to understand the circumstances of clinical research. The tasks and responsibilities of the institutions and investigators in human subject research to preserve the safety and welfare of research subjects are summarized. Next, several debated ethical issues and insights are arranged as controversial topics. This brief review and summary seeks to highlight important arguments and make suggestions to institutional review boards (IRBs) to contribute to the future evolution of ethics in clinical research as we advance forward.

摘要

临床研究在过去几十年中得到了极大的扩展,因此人们对保护人类受试者的伦理准则越来越感兴趣。本综述按时间顺序总结了第二次世界大战以来的历史丑闻和社会反应,以强调我们必须从历史中吸取教训。还简要描述了涉及人类受试者的研究的国际伦理准则,以便了解临床研究的情况。总结了机构和研究者在人体研究中保护研究对象安全和福利的任务和责任。接下来,作为有争议的话题,安排了几个有争议的伦理问题和见解。本简要回顾和总结旨在突出重要论点,并向机构审查委员会(IRB)提出建议,以促进我们向前推进时临床研究中伦理的未来发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb0/3272525/8bcdfd92264a/kjae-62-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb0/3272525/8bcdfd92264a/kjae-62-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb0/3272525/8bcdfd92264a/kjae-62-3-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research.机构审查委员会(IRB)与临床研究中的伦理问题。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jan;62(1):3-12. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.3. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Ethical and institutional review board issues.伦理与机构审查委员会问题
Adv Neurol. 1998;76:253-62.
4
The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.临床研究伦理咨询的出现:来自国家合作的见解。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Jan;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1401156.
5
The History of Human Subjects Research and Rationale for Institutional Review Board Oversight.人类研究对象的历史及机构审查委员会监督的基本原理。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;36(3):560-567. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10623. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.机构审查委员会(IRB)对临床创新的影响:对研究者和IRB成员的一项调查
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):481-7. doi: 10.1177/1556264615614936.
7
Inconsistencies in institutional review board decisions: A proposal to regulate the decision-making process.机构审查委员会决策中的不一致性:规范决策过程的一项提议。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120(2):95-101. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2019_015.
8
Supplementing the traditional institutional review board with an environmental health and community review board.用环境卫生与社区审查委员会补充传统的机构审查委员会。
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Oct;114(10):1626-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9005.
9
Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.了解机构审查委员会:IRB审查过程实用指南
Nutr Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;22(6):618-28. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022006618.
10
Institutional Review Board Quality, Private Equity, and Promoting Ethical Human Subjects Research.机构审查委员会质量、私募股权与促进合乎伦理的人类受试者研究
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 6;173(7):558-562. doi: 10.7326/M20-1674. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical research in rare diseases in Brazil: challenges and opportunities.巴西罕见病的临床研究:挑战与机遇。
J Community Genet. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00793-4.
2
Development of a job satisfaction measure for clinical research professionals: A mixed methods approach.临床研究专业人员工作满意度量表的开发:一种混合方法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 24;9(1):e55. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.34. eCollection 2025.
3
Overheard at a conference: an in-class activity to foster classroom discussion on ethics and experimental systems in microbiology research.

本文引用的文献

1
How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US.美国地方 IRB 如何看待中心 IRB。
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Jun 23;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-13.
2
Use of deferred consent for severely ill children in a multi-centre phase III trial.多中心 III 期临床试验中对重病儿童使用延期同意。
Trials. 2011 Mar 31;12:90. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-90.
3
Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries.发展中国家人类基因组学研究中的伦理问题。
在一次会议上听到的:一项课堂活动,旨在促进关于微生物学研究中的伦理和实验系统的课堂讨论。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2025 Apr 24;26(1):e0014724. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00147-24. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
4
A Review on Integrating Breast Cancer Clinical Data: A Unified Platform Perspective.整合乳腺癌临床数据综述:统一平台视角
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Jan;26(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01285-2. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
5
A study on the normative path of ethics review in China: based on the perspective of Panopticism.中国伦理审查规范路径研究:基于全景敞视主义视角
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 27;10:1268046. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1268046. eCollection 2023.
6
Continuous quality improvement: reducing informed consent form signing errors.持续质量改进:减少知情同意书签署错误。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Aug 4;24(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00933-w.
7
Raising concerns on questionable ethics approvals - a case study of 456 trials from the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection.对可疑伦理批准的担忧——以地中海感染大学医院研究所的456项试验为例
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 Aug 3;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00134-4.
8
Institutional review boards in Saudi Arabia: the first survey-based report on their functions and operations.沙特阿拉伯的机构审查委员会:基于调查的首次关于其职能和运作的报告。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00928-7.
9
Best Practices from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) for Clinical Research During a Pandemic or Emergency.美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)关于大流行或紧急情况下临床研究的最佳实践。
J Pain Res. 2023 Feb 1;16:327-339. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S393539. eCollection 2023.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Access and Utilization among Medicaid Managed Care Beneficiaries.医疗补助管理式医疗受益人群在医疗服务可及性和利用方面的种族和族裔差异。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;50(2):194-213. doi: 10.1007/s11414-022-09811-6. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Mar 18;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-5.
4
Clinical research regulation: challenges to the institutional review board system.临床研究监管:机构审查委员会制度面临的挑战
Clin Dermatol. 2009 Jul-Aug;27(4):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.012.
5
Ethics and clinical research.伦理与临床研究
N Engl J Med. 1966 Jun 16;274(24):1354-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196606162742405.