Suppr超能文献

超声引导腋路臂丛神经阻滞中 0.5%和 0.375%左旋布比卡因的临床比较:神经刺激法。

Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jan;62(1):24-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.24. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB), where relatively large doses of local anesthetics are administered, levobupivacaine is preferred due to a greater margin of safety. However, the efficacy of levobupivacaine in ABPB has not been studied much. We performed a prospective, double-blinded study to compare the clinical effect of 0.375% levobupivacaine with 0.5% levobupivacaine for ultrasound (US)-guided ABPB with nerve stimulation.

METHODS

FORTY PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE UPPER LIMB SURGERY WERE RANDOMIZED INTO TWO GROUPS: Group I (0.375% levobupivacaine) and Group II (0.5% levobupivacaine). All four main terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were blocked separately with 7 ml of levobupivacaine using US guidance with nerve stimulation according to study group. A blinded observer recorded the onset time for sensory and motor block, elapsed time to be ready for surgery, recovery time for sensory and motor block, quality of anesthesia, patient satisfaction and complications.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the time to find nerve locations, time to perform block and number of skin punctures between groups. Insufficient block was reported in one patient of Group I, but no failed block was reported in either group. There were no differences in the onset time for sensory and motor block, elapsed time to be ready for surgery, patient satisfaction and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

0.375% levobupivacaine produced adequate anesthesia for ABPB using US guidance with nerve stimulation, without any clinically significant differences compared to 0.5% levobupivacaine.

摘要

背景

在腋路臂丛神经阻滞(ABPB)中,由于需要给予相对较大剂量的局部麻醉剂,因此左旋布比卡因是首选,因为它的安全性更高。然而,左旋布比卡因在 ABPB 中的疗效尚未得到广泛研究。我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲研究,比较了超声(US)引导下神经刺激的 ABPB 中 0.375%左旋布比卡因与 0.5%左旋布比卡因的临床效果。

方法

40 例行择期上肢手术的患者随机分为两组:I 组(0.375%左旋布比卡因)和 II 组(0.5%左旋布比卡因)。根据研究组,使用 US 引导和神经刺激,分别用 7ml 的左旋布比卡因阻滞臂丛神经的四个主要终末神经。一位盲法观察者记录感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间、手术准备时间、感觉和运动阻滞的恢复时间、麻醉质量、患者满意度和并发症。

结果

两组在找到神经位置的时间、进行阻滞的时间和皮肤穿刺次数方面均无显著差异。I 组有 1 例患者阻滞不完全,但两组均无阻滞失败。感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间、手术准备时间、患者满意度和并发症方面无差异。

结论

0.375%左旋布比卡因在 US 引导下神经刺激的 ABPB 中产生了足够的麻醉效果,与 0.5%左旋布比卡因相比,无任何临床显著差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Gross anatomy of the brachial plexus sheath in human cadavers.人体尸体臂丛神经鞘的大体解剖
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.09.003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验