• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四年后,未参与研究试验和参与研究试验的学生中,6 级艾滋病毒减少风险干预的效果。

Effect of a grade 6 HIV risk reduction intervention four years later among students who were and were not enrolled in the study trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Prevention Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2012 Mar;50(3):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.012
PMID:22325129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3279702/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term impact of HIV-prevention interventions delivered to youth before sexual initiation and the effects of interventions delivered in nonstudy settings.

METHODS

A five-group comparison of HIV knowledge, and condom-use skills, self-efficacy, intentions, and practice among 1,997 grade 10 students attending one of the eight government high schools in Nassau, The Bahamas. Group 1 received an HIV-prevention intervention, Focus on Youth in the Caribbean (FOYC), in grade 6 as part of a randomized trial; group 2 received FOYC as part of the regular school curriculum but outside of the trial; group 3 received the control condition as part of the trial; group 4 received the control condition as part of the school curriculum but outside of the trial; and individuals in group 5 (naive controls) were not enrolled in a school receiving FOYC or the control conditon and did not participate in the trial.

RESULTS

FOYC youth compared with the control youth and naive controls had higher HIV knowledge, condom-use skills, and self-efficacy 4 years later. By subgroups, group 1 demonstrated higher HIV/AIDS knowledge than all groups except group 2, higher condom skills than all groups, and higher condom self-efficacy than Naive Controls. Youth in group 2 demonstrated higher HIV knowledge than youth in groups 3-5. Behavioral effects were not found.

CONCLUSIONS

FOYC delivered to grade 6 students continued to have protective effects 4 years later. Positive effects are present among youth who received FOYC as part of the school curriculum but were not enrolled in the trial.

摘要

目的

评估在性初潮前向青年提供的艾滋病预防干预措施的长期影响,以及在非研究环境中提供的干预措施的效果。

方法

对巴哈马拿骚的八所政府高中之一的 1997 名 10 年级学生进行了五项比较,比较他们在 HIV 知识、 condom 使用技能、自我效能、意图和实践方面的差异。第 1 组是在 6 年级接受了 Focus on Youth in the Caribbean (FOYC) 艾滋病预防干预措施的学生,这是一项随机试验的一部分;第 2 组是在试验之外作为常规学校课程的一部分接受 FOYC 的学生;第 3 组是接受对照条件的学生,这是试验的一部分;第 4 组是在试验之外作为常规学校课程的一部分接受对照条件的学生;第 5 组(未受教育组)的个体没有被纳入接受 FOYC 或对照条件的学校,也没有参与试验。

结果

与对照组和未受教育组相比,接受 FOYC 的青少年在 4 年后具有更高的 HIV 知识、 condom 使用技能和自我效能。按亚组分析,第 1 组的 HIV/AIDS 知识水平高于除第 2 组以外的所有组, condom 使用技能高于所有组, condom 自我效能高于未受教育组。第 2 组的青少年比第 3-5 组的青少年具有更高的 HIV 知识。没有发现行为效果。

结论

6 年级学生接受的 FOYC 在 4 年后仍具有保护作用。在接受 FOYC 作为学校课程的一部分但未参与试验的青少年中,也存在积极的效果。

相似文献

1
Effect of a grade 6 HIV risk reduction intervention four years later among students who were and were not enrolled in the study trial.四年后,未参与研究试验和参与研究试验的学生中,6 级艾滋病毒减少风险干预的效果。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Mar;50(3):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
2
Reduction in human immunodeficiency virus risk among youth in developing countries.发展中国家青少年感染人类免疫缺陷病毒风险的降低。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Dec;161(12):1130-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.12.1130.
3
Sustained institutional effects of an evidence-based HIV prevention intervention.基于证据的艾滋病预防干预措施的持续机构效应。
Prev Sci. 2014 Jun;15(3):340-9. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0397-3.
4
Adolescent age at time of receipt of one or more sexual risk reduction interventions.接受一项或多项降低性风险干预措施时的青少年年龄。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Aug;55(2):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
5
Fidelity of implementation of an evidence-based HIV prevention program among Bahamian sixth grade students.巴哈马六年级学生中基于证据的艾滋病毒预防计划的实施保真度。
Prev Sci. 2015 Jan;16(1):110-21. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0486-y.
6
A cluster randomized controlled trial of an adolescent HIV prevention program among Bahamian youth: effect at 12 months post-intervention.巴哈马青少年中一项青少年艾滋病毒预防计划的整群随机对照试验:干预后12个月的效果。
AIDS Behav. 2009 Jun;13(3):499-508. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9511-0. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
7
Effects on condom use of an HIV prevention programme 36 months postintervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial among Bahamian youth.干预36个月后艾滋病预防项目对避孕套使用的影响:巴哈马青年中的一项整群随机对照试验
Int J STD AIDS. 2010 Sep;21(9):622-30. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2010.010039.
8
Preparing for national implementation of an evidence-based, effective HIV prevention program among bahamian sixth-grade students.为在巴哈马六年级学生中全国性实施一项基于证据的有效艾滋病毒预防计划做准备。
World Health Popul. 2012;13(4):28-42. doi: 10.12927/whp.2012.22924.
9
Factors influencing implementation dose and fidelity thereof and related student outcomes of an evidence-based national HIV prevention program.影响一项基于证据的全国性艾滋病毒预防计划实施剂量、实施保真度及其相关学生成果的因素。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 7;10:44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0236-y.
10
Multi-year school-based implementation and student outcomes of an evidence-based risk reduction intervention.一项基于证据的风险降低干预措施的多年校内实施情况及学生成果
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 10;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0539-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Teacher Training and Continued Support on the Delivery of an Evidence-Based HIV Prevention Program: Findings From a National Implementation Study in the Bahamas.教师培训和持续支持对基于证据的艾滋病毒预防方案实施的影响:巴哈马全国实施研究结果
Health Educ Behav. 2023 Dec;50(6):770-782. doi: 10.1177/10901981231195881. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
2
Comparing standard versus enhanced implementation of an evidence-based HIV prevention program among Bahamian sixth grade students: findings from nationwide implementation trials.比较巴哈马六年级学生中基于证据的艾滋病毒预防方案的标准与强化实施情况:全国实施试验结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):1442. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13848-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of effective health innovations and pediatricians.有效健康创新措施的实施与儿科医生。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Nov;50(11):995-1000. doi: 10.1177/0009922811407183.
2
Focus on youth in the Caribbean: beyond the numbers.关注加勒比地区的青年:超越数字表象。
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2011 Sep-Oct;10(5):316-25. doi: 10.1177/1545109710397367. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
3
Effects on condom use of an HIV prevention programme 36 months postintervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial among Bahamian youth.
Condom application skills and self-efficacy in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
青少年使用避孕套的技巧和自我效能感:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249753. eCollection 2021.
4
Adolescent HIV Risk Reduction in the Bahamas: Results from Two Randomized Controlled Intervention Trials Spanning Elementary School Through High School.巴哈马青少年降低艾滋病病毒风险:两项涵盖小学至高中的随机对照干预试验结果
AIDS Behav. 2016 Jun;20(6):1182-96. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1225-5.
5
Teachers' patterns of implementation of an evidence-based intervention and their impact on student outcomes: results from a nationwide dissemination over 24-months follow-up.教师实施循证干预的模式及其对学生成绩的影响:24个月随访全国范围推广的结果
AIDS Behav. 2015 Oct;19(10):1828-40. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1110-2.
6
Cross-sectional data on alcohol and marijuana use and sexual behavior among male and female secondary school students in New Providence, The Bahamas.巴哈马新普罗维登斯岛男女中学生饮酒、吸食大麻情况及性行为的横断面数据。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016 May 1;28(2):133-40. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2014-0079.
7
Assessing the effects of a complementary parent intervention and prior exposure to a preadolescent program of HIV risk reduction for mid-adolescents.评估一项针对青少年中期人群的辅助性家长干预措施以及先前参与青少年前期艾滋病毒风险降低项目的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):575-83. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302345. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
8
A quarter century of HIV prevention intervention efforts among children and adolescents across the globe.全球针对儿童和青少年开展的长达25年的艾滋病病毒预防干预工作。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):231-251. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.889572.
9
Fidelity of implementation of an evidence-based HIV prevention program among Bahamian sixth grade students.巴哈马六年级学生中基于证据的艾滋病毒预防计划的实施保真度。
Prev Sci. 2015 Jan;16(1):110-21. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0486-y.
10
Adolescent age at time of receipt of one or more sexual risk reduction interventions.接受一项或多项降低性风险干预措施时的青少年年龄。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Aug;55(2):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
干预36个月后艾滋病预防项目对避孕套使用的影响:巴哈马青年中的一项整群随机对照试验
Int J STD AIDS. 2010 Sep;21(9):622-30. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2010.010039.
4
Long-term biological and behavioural impact of an adolescent sexual health intervention in Tanzania: follow-up survey of the community-based MEMA kwa Vijana Trial.坦桑尼亚青少年性健康干预的长期生物学和行为影响:基于社区的 MEMA kwa Vijana 试验的随访调查。
PLoS Med. 2010 Jun 8;7(6):e1000287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000287.
5
Condom-use skills checklist: a proxy for assessing condom-use knowledge and skills when direct observation is not possible.避孕套使用技能清单:在无法进行直接观察时用于评估避孕套使用知识和技能的替代方法。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2009 Jun;27(3):406-13. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i3.3383.
6
Effects through 24 months of an HIV/AIDS prevention intervention program based on protection motivation theory among preadolescents in the Bahamas.巴哈马针对青春期前儿童开展的基于保护动机理论的艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防干预项目长达24个月的效果。
Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):e917-28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2363. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
7
The past, present, and future of HIV prevention: integrating behavioral, biomedical, and structural intervention strategies for the next generation of HIV prevention.艾滋病病毒预防的过去、现在与未来:为下一代艾滋病病毒预防整合行为、生物医学及结构干预策略。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:143-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153530.
8
Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better.减少艾滋病毒传播的行为策略:如何使其更有效发挥作用。
Lancet. 2008 Aug 23;372(9639):669-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60886-7. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
9
HIV preventive interventions for adolescents: a look back and ahead.青少年的艾滋病病毒预防干预措施:回顾与展望
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007 Dec;4(4):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s11904-007-0025-6.
10
An extension of control group design.对照组设计的一种扩展。
Psychol Bull. 1949 Mar;46(2):137-50. doi: 10.1037/h0062958.