Suppr超能文献

内隐态度测量是否比外显与情绪相关的测量更能渐进地预测零食行为?

Do implicit measures of attitudes incrementally predict snacking behaviour over explicit affect-related measures?

机构信息

Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Appetite. 2012 Jun;58(3):835-41. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.019. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

Abstract

Various studies have demonstrated an association between implicit measures of attitudes and dietary-related behaviours. However, no study has tested whether implicit measures of attitudes predict dietary behaviour after controlling for explicit measures of palatability. In a prospective design, two studies assessed the validity of measures of implicit attitude (Implicit Association Test, IAT) and explicit measures of palatability and health-related attitudes on self-reported (Studies 1 and 2) and objective food (fruit vs. chocolate) choice (Study 2). Following regression analyses, in both studies, implicit measures of attitudes were correlated with food choice but failed to significantly predict food choice when controlling specifically for explicit measures of palatability. These consistent relationships emerged despite using different category labels within the IAT in the two studies. The current research suggests implicit measures of attitudes may not predict dietary behaviours after taking into account the palatability of food. This is important in order to establish determinants that explain unique variance in dietary behaviours and to inform dietary change interventions.

摘要

多项研究表明,态度的内隐测量与饮食相关行为之间存在关联。然而,尚无研究检验在控制了食物美味度的外显测量后,态度的内隐测量是否能预测饮食行为。在一项前瞻性设计中,两项研究评估了内隐态度测量(内隐联想测验,IAT)以及食物美味度和健康相关态度的外显测量在自我报告(研究 1 和 2)和客观食物(水果与巧克力)选择(研究 2)上的有效性。在回归分析后,在两项研究中,态度的内隐测量与食物选择相关,但在专门控制食物美味度的外显测量后,内隐测量无法显著预测食物选择。尽管在两项研究中 IAT 中使用了不同的类别标签,但仍出现了这些一致的关系。本研究表明,在考虑食物美味度后,态度的内隐测量可能无法预测饮食行为。这对于确定能够解释饮食行为中独特差异的决定因素以及为饮食改变干预措施提供信息非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验