SUEZ ENVIRONNEMENT, CIRSEE, Analysis & Health Division, 38 rue du Président Wilson, 78230 Le Pecq, France.
Waste Manag. 2012 Jun;32(6):1106-15. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
Microbial quality of air inside vehicle cabs is a major occupational health risk management issue in composting facilities. Large differences and discrepancies in protection factors between vehicles and between biological agents have been reported. This study aimed at estimating the mean protection efficiency of the vehicle cab environment against bioaerosols with higher precision. In-cab measurement results were also analysed to ascertain whether or not these protection systems reduce workers' exposure to tolerable levels. Five front-end loaders, one mobile mixer and two agricultural tractors pulling windrow turners were investigated. Four vehicles were fitted with a pressurisation and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration system. The four others were only equipped with pleated paper filter without pressurisation. Bacteria, fungi and endotoxins were measured in 72 pairs of air samples, simultaneously collected inside the cab and on the outside of the cab with a CIP 10-M sampler. A front-end loader, purchased a few weeks previously, fitted with a pressurisation and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration system, and with a clean cab, exhibited a mean protection efficiency of between 99.47% CI 95% [98.58-99.97%] and 99.91% [99.78-99.98%] depending on the biological agent. It is likely that the lower protection efficiency demonstrated in other vehicles was caused by penetration through the only moderately efficient filters, by the absence of pressurisation, by leakage in the filter-sealing system, and by re-suspension of particles which accumulated in dirty cabs. Mean protection efficiency in regards to bacteria and endotoxins ranged between 92.64% [81.87-97.89%] and 98.61% [97.41-99.38%], and between 92.68% [88.11-96.08%] and 98.43% [97.44-99.22%], respectively. The mean protection efficiency was the lowest when confronted with fungal spores, from 59.76% [4.19-90.75%] to 94.71% [91.07-97.37%]. The probability that in-cab exposure to fungi exceeded the benchmark value for short-term respiratory effects suggests that front-end loaders and mobile mixers in composting facilities should be fitted with a pressurisation and HEPA filtration system, regardless of whether or not the facility is indoors or outdoors. Regarding the tractors, exposure inside the cabs was not significantly reduced. However, in this study, there was a less than 0.01% risk of exceeding the bench mark value associated with fungi related short-term respiratory effects during an 1-h per day windrow turning operation. Pressurisation and a HEPA filtration system can provide safe working conditions inside loaders and mobile mixer with regard to airborne bacteria, fungi and endotoxins in composting facilities. However, regular thorough cleaning of the vehicle cab, as well as overalls and shoes cleaning, and mitigation of leakage in the filter-sealing system are necessary to achieve high levels of protection efficiency.
车内空气微生物质量是堆肥设施中职业健康风险管理的主要问题。据报道,车辆之间和生物制剂之间的保护因子存在很大差异和差异。本研究旨在更精确地估计车辆驾驶室环境对生物气溶胶的平均保护效率。还分析了车内测量结果,以确定这些保护系统是否将工人的暴露降低到可容忍的水平。研究了五台前端装载机、一台移动混合机和两台牵引耙式翻堆机。其中四辆配备了加压和高效空气过滤系统(HEPA)。其他四辆仅配备了无加压褶式纸过滤器。使用 CIP 10-M 采样器同时在驾驶室内部和驾驶室外部收集了 72 对空气样本,以测量细菌、真菌和内毒素。一台前端装载机,几周前购买,配备了加压和高效空气过滤系统(HEPA),驾驶室清洁,其平均保护效率在 99.47%CI95%[98.58-99.97%]和 99.91%[99.78-99.98%]之间,具体取决于生物制剂。其他车辆中较低的保护效率可能是由于仅中等效率的过滤器的穿透、无加压、过滤器密封系统的泄漏以及在肮脏的驾驶室中积累的颗粒的再悬浮所致。细菌和内毒素的平均保护效率在 92.64%[81.87-97.89%]和 98.61%[97.41-99.38%]之间,以及 92.68%[88.11-96.08%]和 98.43%[97.44-99.22%]之间,分别。当遇到真菌孢子时,平均保护效率最低,为 59.76%[4.19-90.75%]至 94.71%[91.07-97.37%]。驾驶室中真菌暴露超过短期呼吸影响基准值的可能性表明,堆肥设施中的前端装载机和移动混合机应配备加压和高效空气过滤系统,无论设施是在室内还是室外。关于拖拉机,驾驶室内部的暴露并没有显著减少。然而,在这项研究中,在每天 1 小时耙式翻堆作业过程中,与真菌相关的短期呼吸影响相关的基准值的风险小于 0.01%。在堆肥设施中,加压和高效空气过滤系统可为前端装载机和移动混合机的空气传播细菌、真菌和内毒素提供安全的工作条件。然而,为了实现高水平的保护效率,有必要对车辆驾驶室进行定期彻底清洁,以及对工作服和鞋子进行清洁,并减轻过滤器密封系统的泄漏。