• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业政策如何影响美国的卡路里摄入量?

How have agricultural policies influenced caloric consumption in the United States?

机构信息

Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2013 Mar;22(3):316-39. doi: 10.1002/hec.2799. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1002/hec.2799
PMID:22331635
Abstract

Many commentators have speculated that agricultural policies have contributed to increased obesity rates in the United States, yet such claims are often made without any analysis of the complex links between real-world farm commodity support programs, prices and consumption of foods, and caloric intake. This article carefully studies the effects of US agricultural policies on prices and quantities of 10 agricultural commodities and nine food categories in the United States over time. Using a detailed multimarket model, we simulate the counterfactual removal of measures of support applied to US agricultural commodities in 1992, 1997, and 2002 and quantify the effects on US food consumption and caloric intake. To parameterize the simulations, we calculate three alternative measures of consumer support (the implicit consumer subsidy from policies that support producers) for the 10 agricultural commodities using information about government expenditures on agricultural commodities from various sources. Our results indicate that-holding all other policies constant-removing US subsidies on grains and oilseeds in the three periods would have caused caloric consumption to decrease minimally whereas removal of all US agricultural policies (including barriers against imports of sugar and dairy products) would have caused total caloric intake to increase. Our results also indicate that the influence of agricultural policies on caloric intake has diminished over time.

摘要

许多评论员推测,农业政策导致了美国肥胖率的上升,但此类说法往往没有分析现实世界中的农场商品支持计划、价格与食品消费和热量摄入之间的复杂联系。本文仔细研究了美国农业政策对美国 10 种农产品和 9 种食品类别的价格和数量随时间推移的影响。使用详细的多市场模型,我们模拟了 1992 年、1997 年和 2002 年取消对美国农产品支持措施的反事实情况,并量化了对美国食品消费和热量摄入的影响。为了对模拟进行参数化,我们使用各种来源的关于政府对农产品支出的信息,为 10 种农产品计算了消费者支持的三种替代措施(支持生产者的政策的隐含消费者补贴)。我们的结果表明,在所有其他政策保持不变的情况下,取消这三个时期的谷物和油籽的美国补贴将导致热量消耗最小化,而取消所有美国农业政策(包括对糖和奶制品进口的壁垒)将导致总热量摄入增加。我们的结果还表明,农业政策对热量摄入的影响随着时间的推移而减弱。

相似文献

1
How have agricultural policies influenced caloric consumption in the United States?农业政策如何影响美国的卡路里摄入量?
Health Econ. 2013 Mar;22(3):316-39. doi: 10.1002/hec.2799. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
2
Impact of agricultural policies on caloric consumption.农业政策对热量消耗的影响。
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Jun;24(6):269-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
3
Remembering the farmer in the agriculture policy and obesity debate.在农业政策与肥胖问题的辩论中铭记农民。
Food Drug Law J. 2010;65(2):391-401, iii.
4
Exporting obesity: US farm and trade policy and the transformation of the Mexican consumer food environment.输出肥胖问题:美国农业与贸易政策及墨西哥消费者食品环境的转变
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;18(1):53-65. doi: 10.1179/1077352512Z.0000000007.
5
Agricultural subsidies and the American obesity epidemic.农业补贴与美国肥胖症泛滥
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.010.
6
The fat of the land: do agricultural subsidies foster poor health?土地的财富:农业补贴会助长健康问题吗?
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Oct;112(14):A820-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.112-a820.
7
Consumption of Foods Derived from Subsidized Crops Remains Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk: An Update on the Evidence Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2014.消费补贴作物食品与心血管代谢风险相关:基于 2009-2014 年全国健康与营养调查的最新证据。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 23;12(11):3244. doi: 10.3390/nu12113244.
8
Availability and consumption of competitive foods in US public schools.美国公立学校中竞争性食品的供应与消费情况。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Feb;109(2 Suppl):S57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.063.
9
Agricultural policy and childhood obesity: a food systems and public health commentary.农业政策与儿童肥胖:食物系统与公共健康述评。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):405-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0102.
10
Trends in U.S. food prices, 1950-2007.1950 - 2007年美国食品价格趋势
Econ Hum Biol. 2009 Mar;7(1):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographical patterns of implementing a government subsidy program: implications for health outcomes and nutrient intake in Iran.政府补贴计划实施的地域模式:对伊朗健康结果和营养摄入的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 31;12:1354099. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354099. eCollection 2024.
2
Emerging Trends in Clinical Research: With Implications for Population Health and Health Policy.临床研究的新兴趋势:对人口健康和卫生政策的影响。
Milbank Q. 2018 Jun;96(2):369-401. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12328.
3
Healthy and sustainable diets for future generations.
为子孙后代提供健康和可持续的饮食。
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Jul;98(9):3219-3224. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8953. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
4
Association of Higher Consumption of Foods Derived From Subsidized Commodities With Adverse Cardiometabolic Risk Among US Adults.美国成年人中,较高消费补贴商品衍生食品与不良心血管代谢风险的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1124-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2410.
5
The contribution of subsidized food commodities to total energy intake among US adults.补贴食品商品对美国成年人总能量摄入的贡献。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun;19(8):1348-57. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002414. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
Strategic nutrition: a vision for the twenty-first century.战略营养:21世纪的愿景。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jan;19(1):164-75. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014003292. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
Mainstreaming modeling and simulation to accelerate public health innovation.将建模和模拟纳入主流,加速公共卫生创新。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jul;104(7):1181-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301873. Epub 2014 May 15.
8
Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis.更健康的食物和饮食模式是否比不太健康的选择花费更高?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 5;3(12):e004277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004277.