Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3428-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113870109. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
The morphological study of extinct taxa allows for analysis of a diverse set of macroevolutionary hypotheses, including testing for change in the magnitude of morphological divergence, extinction selectivity on form, and the ecological context of radiations. Late Ordovician graptoloids experienced a phylogenetic bottleneck at the Hirnantian mass extinction (∼445 Ma), when a major clade of graptoloids was driven to extinction while another clade simultaneously radiated. In this study, we developed a dataset of 49 ecologically relevant characters for 183 species with which we tested two main hypotheses: (i) could the biased survival of one graptoloid clade over another have resulted from morphological selectivity alone and (ii) are the temporal patterns of morphological disparity and innovation during the recovery consistent with an interpretation as an adaptive radiation resulting from ecological release? We find that a general model of morphological selectivity has a low probability of producing the observed pattern of taxonomic selectivity. Contrary to predictions from theory on adaptive radiations and ecological speciation, changes in disparity and species richness are uncoupled. We also find that the early recovery is unexpectedly characterized by relatively low morphological disparity and innovation, despite also being an interval of elevated speciation. Because it is necessary to invoke factors other than ecology to explain the graptoloid recovery, more complex models may be needed to explain recovery dynamics after mass extinctions.
灭绝分类单元的形态研究允许对一系列不同的宏观进化假说进行分析,包括检验形态分歧幅度的变化、形态灭绝选择以及辐射的生态背景。晚奥陶世笔石类在赫南特灭绝事件(约 4.45 亿年前)经历了一个系统发育瓶颈,当时一个主要的笔石类分支灭绝,而另一个分支同时辐射。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个包含 49 个生态相关特征的数据集,其中包含 183 个物种,我们用这个数据集检验了两个主要假说:(i)一个笔石类分支相对于另一个分支的偏生存是否仅仅是由于形态选择性,(ii)在恢复过程中形态差异和创新的时间模式是否与生态释放导致的适应性辐射的解释一致?我们发现,形态选择性的一般模型产生观察到的分类选择性模式的可能性很低。与关于适应性辐射和生态物种形成的理论预测相反,差异和物种丰富度的变化是不相关的。我们还发现,尽管也是一个高物种形成的时期,但早期的恢复却出乎意料地具有相对较低的形态差异和创新。因为需要援引生态以外的因素来解释笔石类的恢复,所以可能需要更复杂的模型来解释大灭绝后的恢复动态。