基于锥形束 CT 的全颜面重建和半颜面重建头影测量的准确性和可重复性。

Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements performed in full and hemifacial reconstructions derived from cone beam computed tomography.

机构信息

Dental School of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):827-32. doi: 10.2319/072711-473.1. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the reproducibility and validity of angular measurements from virtual lateral cephalometric radiography (LCR) reconstructions (full and hemifacial on both sides) derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight CBCT and LCR images were selected. CBCT volume data were imported into Nemotec software, and virtual LCR images and tomographic slices from CBCT images were assessed. Three observers digitized landmarks used for 12 angular measurements in CBCT images from all patients at two different times. The LCR were evaluated by two examiners, and the mean of the measurements was used as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The virtual hemifacial LCR of tomographic slices on the right side showed statistically different higher measures. The same modality on both sides showed less absolute differences for most measures except FMIA and interincisal angles. All modalities had excellent reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The angular measurements made on virtual LCR reconstructions derived from CBCT are reproducible and valid. Some advantage was found over virtual hemifacial LCR on both sides of the image, mainly in its handling facility.

摘要

目的

测试来自锥形束 CT(CBCT)的虚拟侧位头颅影像(LCR)重建(双侧完整和半侧)的角度测量的重现性和有效性。

材料和方法

选择了 58 个 CBCT 和 LCR 图像。将 CBCT 体数据导入 Nemotec 软件,并对虚拟 LCR 图像和 CBCT 图像的断层切片进行评估。三位观察者在两次不同时间对所有患者的 CBCT 图像中的 12 个角度测量标志点进行了数字化。由两位检查者评估 LCR,并将测量的平均值作为金标准。

结果

右侧断层切片的虚拟半侧 LCR 显示出统计学上更高的测量值。除了 FMIA 和切牙间角度外,两侧相同模式的大多数测量值的绝对差异较小。所有模式都具有出色的重现性。

结论

来自 CBCT 的虚拟 LCR 重建的角度测量是可重现且有效的。与图像两侧的虚拟半侧 LCR 相比,发现一些优势主要在于其操作便利性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索