Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 20;46(6):3076-84. doi: 10.1021/es204514f. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
This paper examines the cost of CO(2) capture and storage (CCS) for natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants. Existing studies employ a broad range of assumptions and lack a consistent costing method. This study takes a more systematic approach to analyze plants with an amine-based postcombustion CCS system with 90% CO(2) capture. We employ sensitivity analyses together with a probabilistic analysis to quantify costs for plants with and without CCS under uncertainty or variability in key parameters. Results for new baseload plants indicate a likely increase in levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of $20-32/MWh (constant 2007$) or $22-40/MWh in current dollars. A risk premium for plants with CCS increases these ranges to $23-39/MWh and $25-46/MWh, respectively. Based on current cost estimates, our analysis further shows that a policy to encourage CCS at new NGCC plants via an emission tax or carbon price requires (at 95% confidence) a price of at least $125/t CO(2) to ensure NGCC-CCS is cheaper than a plant without CCS. Higher costs are found for nonbaseload plants and CCS retrofits.
本文探讨了天然气联合循环(NGCC)电厂二氧化碳捕集与封存(CCS)的成本。现有研究采用了广泛的假设,缺乏一致的成本核算方法。本研究采用更系统的方法,分析了采用胺基燃烧后 CCS 系统和 90%二氧化碳捕集的电厂。我们采用敏感性分析和概率分析,在关键参数存在不确定性或变化的情况下,对有和没有 CCS 的电厂的成本进行量化。对于新的基荷电厂,结果表明,在 2007 年不变的情况下,平准化度电成本(LCOE)可能增加 20-32 美元/MWh,或当前美元增加 22-40 美元/MWh。对于有 CCS 的电厂,风险溢价将这些范围分别提高到 23-39 美元/MWh 和 25-46 美元/MWh。根据目前的成本估算,我们的分析还表明,通过排放税或碳价格鼓励新 NGCC 电厂采用 CCS 的政策,需要(置信度为 95%)至少 125 美元/t CO2 的价格,才能确保 NGCC-CCS 比没有 CCS 的电厂更便宜。对于非基荷电厂和 CCS retrofit,成本更高。