Schmelz William J, Hochman Gal, Miller Kenneth G
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Institute of Earth, Oceans, and Atmospheric Sciences, Rutgers University, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Department of Agricultural, Food, & Resource Economics, Rutgers University, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Interface Focus. 2020 Oct 6;10(5):20190065. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0065. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
We model the costs of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in subsurface geological formations for emissions from 138 northeastern and midwestern electricity-generating power plants. The analysis suggests coal-sourced CO emissions can be stored in this region at a cost of $52-$60 ton, whereas the cost to store emission from natural-gas-fired plants ranges from approximately $80 to $90. Storing emissions offshore increases the lowest total costs of CCS to over $60 per ton of CO for coal. Because there apparently is sufficient onshore storage in the northeastern and midwestern United States, offshore storage is not necessary or economical unless there are additional costs or suitability issues associated with the onshore reservoirs. For example, if formation pressures are prohibitive in a large-scale deployment of onshore CCS, or if there is opposition to onshore storage, offshore storage space could probably store emissions at an additional cost of less than $10 ton. Finally, it is likely that more than 8 Gt of total CO emissions from this region can be stored for less $60 ton, slightly more than the $50 ton Section 45Q tax credits incentivizing CCS.
我们对美国东北部和中西部138家发电电厂排放的二氧化碳在地下地质构造中进行碳捕获与封存(CCS)的成本进行了建模分析。分析表明,以煤炭为来源的二氧化碳排放可以在该地区以每吨52 - 60美元的成本进行封存,而封存天然气发电厂排放的成本约为每吨80 - 90美元。在近海进行封存会使CCS的最低总成本增加到煤炭每吨二氧化碳超过60美元。由于美国东北部和中西部显然有足够的陆上封存空间,除非陆上储存库存在额外成本或适用性问题,否则近海储存既无必要也不经济。例如,如果在大规模陆上CCS部署中地层压力过高,或者如果存在对陆上储存的反对意见,近海储存空间可能能够以每吨低于10美元的额外成本封存排放物。最后,该地区超过80亿吨的二氧化碳排放总量可能可以以每吨低于60美元的成本进行封存,略高于第45Q条激励CCS的每吨50美元税收抵免。