• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展中国家人力资源卫生:全球疫苗免疫联盟、全球基金和世界银行支持情况分析。

An analysis of GAVI, the Global Fund and World Bank support for human resources for health in developing countries.

机构信息

Human Development Network, The World Bank, 1818 H St NW, Washington DC 20433, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2012 Dec;27(8):649-57. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs012. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czs012
PMID:22333685
Abstract

Shortages, geographic imbalances and poor performance of health workers pose major challenges for improving health service delivery in developing countries. In response, multilateral agencies have increasingly recognized the need to invest in human resources for health (HRH) to assist countries in achieving their health system goals. In this paper we analyse the HRH-related activities of three agencies: the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI); the Global Fund for Aids, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (the Global Fund); and the World Bank. First, we reviewed the type of HRH-related activities that are eligible for financing within each agency. Second, we reviewed the HRH-related activities that each agency is actually financing. Third, we reviewed the literature to understand the impact that GAVI, Global Fund and World Bank investments in HRH have had on the health workforce in developing countries. Our analysis found that by far the most common activity supported across all agencies is short-term, in-service training. There is relatively little investment in expanding pre-service training capacity, despite large health worker shortages in developing countries. We also found that the majority of GAVI and the Global Fund grants finance health worker remuneration, largely through supplemental allowances, with little information available on how payment rates are determined, how the potential negative consequences are mitigated, and how payments are to be sustained at the end of the grant period. Based on the analysis, we argue there is an opportunity for improved co-ordination between the three agencies at the country level in supporting HRH-related activities. Existing initiatives, such as the International Health Partnership and the Health Systems Funding Platform, could present viable and timely vehicles for the three agencies to implement this improved co-ordination.

摘要

卫生人力短缺、地理分布不均和业绩不佳,是发展中国家改善卫生服务提供面临的主要挑战。为此,多边机构日益认识到需要投资于卫生人力,以协助各国实现其卫生系统目标。本文分析了三个机构的卫生人力相关活动:全球疫苗和免疫联盟(免疫联盟)、全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金(全球基金)和世界银行。首先,我们审查了每个机构中符合供资条件的卫生人力相关活动类型。其次,我们审查了各机构实际供资的卫生人力相关活动。第三,我们查阅文献,以了解免疫联盟、全球基金和世界银行投资于卫生人力对发展中国家卫生工作队伍的影响。我们的分析发现,到目前为止,所有机构最常支持的活动是短期在职培训。尽管发展中国家卫生人力短缺严重,但在扩大职前培训能力方面的投资相对较少。我们还发现,免疫联盟和全球基金赠款的大部分用于支付卫生工作者薪酬,主要是通过补充津贴,而关于薪酬标准如何确定、如何减轻潜在的负面影响以及如何在赠款期结束后维持支付,信息很少。基于分析结果,我们认为三个机构在国家一级有机会改进协调,支持卫生人力相关活动。现有的倡议,如国际卫生伙伴关系和卫生系统供资平台,可为三个机构实施这种改进的协调提供可行和及时的手段。

相似文献

1
An analysis of GAVI, the Global Fund and World Bank support for human resources for health in developing countries.发展中国家人力资源卫生:全球疫苗免疫联盟、全球基金和世界银行支持情况分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Dec;27(8):649-57. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs012. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
2
Global Fund investments in human resources for health: innovation and missed opportunities for health systems strengthening.全球基金对卫生人力资源的投资:加强卫生系统的创新与错失的机遇
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Dec;29(8):986-97. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt080. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
3
[The Global Fund to fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria 5-y: evaluation policy issues].[抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾全球基金5年:评估政策问题]
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2010 May;103(2):119-22. doi: 10.1007/s13149-010-0051-2. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
4
Absorptive capacity and disbursements by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: analysis of grant implementation.全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金的吸收能力与支出:赠款实施情况分析
Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):483-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69156-3.
5
The Global Fund: managing great expectations.全球基金:应对过高期望
Lancet. 2004;364(9428):95-100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16595-1.
6
Global fund financing of tuberculosis services delivery in prisons.全球基金为监狱提供结核病服务的资金支持。
J Infect Dis. 2012 May 15;205 Suppl 2:S274-83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis042. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
7
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: funding for unpopular public-health programmes.抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾全球基金:为不受欢迎的公共卫生项目提供资金。
Lancet. 2004;364(9428):11-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16610-5.
8
Who pays for cooperation in global health? A comparative analysis of WHO, the World Bank, the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.谁为全球卫生合作买单?世卫组织、世界银行、全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金以及全球疫苗免疫联盟的比较分析。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):324-332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32402-3. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
9
The role of the Technical Review Panel of the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: an analysis of grant recommendations.全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金技术审查小组的作用:对赠款建议的分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Apr 1;33(3):335-344. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx186.
10
The Global Fund: growing pains.全球基金:成长的烦恼。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Nov;7(11):695. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70243-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of global health initiatives on the quality of care for maternal health services in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.全球卫生倡议对撒哈拉以南非洲孕产妇保健服务质量的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 24;14(11):e084263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084263.
2
A gap analysis of midwifery competency, pre- and in-service education for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and, adolescent health in Lao People's Democratic Republic.老挝人民民主共和国助产士能力、生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童及青少年健康的职前和在职教育的差距分析。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Dec 5;43:100959. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100959. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Health expenditure: how much is spent on health and care worker remuneration? An analysis of 33 low- and middle-income African countries.
卫生支出:用于卫生和保健工作者薪酬的支出有多少?对 33 个低收入和中等收入非洲国家的分析。
Hum Resour Health. 2023 Dec 20;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00872-y.
4
The roles and involvement of global health partners in the health workforce: an exploratory analysis.全球卫生伙伴在卫生人力方面的作用和参与:探索性分析。
Hum Resour Health. 2023 May 24;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00825-5.
5
Development assistance for human resources for health, 1990-2020.卫生人力资源发展援助,1990-2020 年。
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Jun 10;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00744-x.
6
Estimating population-based coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) interventions from health management information systems: a comprehensive review.从健康管理信息系统估算生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康(RMNCH)干预措施的人群覆盖情况:全面综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 25;21(Suppl 2):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06995-z.
7
Patterns of financial incentives in primary healthcare settings in Nigeria: implications for the productivity of frontline health workers.尼日利亚初级医疗保健环境中的财务激励模式:对一线卫生工作者生产力的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Jun 30;14(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05671-z.
8
Global Fund financing and human resources for health investments in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.全球基金在东地中海地区的卫生人力资源投资与融资。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Jul 8;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00483-x.
9
The know-do gap in sick child care in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚儿童疾病护理中的知行差距。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208898. eCollection 2018.
10
Donor financing of human resources for health, 1990-2016: an examination of trends, sources of funds, and recipients.1990-2016 年卫生人力资源捐赠资金:对趋势、资金来源和接受者的考察。
Global Health. 2018 Oct 17;14(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0416-z.