Lu Chunling, Michaud Catherine M, Khan Kashif, Murray Christopher J L
Harvard Initiative for Global Health, 104 Mount Auburn St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):483-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69156-3.
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria was launched in 2002 to attract and rapidly disburse money to fight these diseases. However, some commentators believe that poor countries cannot effectively use such resources to increase delivery of their health programmes-referred to as a lack of absorptive capacity. We aimed to investigate the major determinants of grant implementation in developing countries.
With information available publicly on the Global Fund's website, we did random-effects analysis to investigate the effect of grant characteristics, types of primary recipient and local fund agent, and country attributes on disbursements that were made between 2003 and 2005 (phase one of Global Fund payments). To check the robustness of findings, regression results from alternative estimation methods and model specifications were also tested.
Grant characteristics--such as size of commitment, lag time between signature and first disbursement, and funding round-had significant effects on grant implementation. Enhanced political stability was associated with high use of grants. Low-income countries, and those with less-developed health systems for a given level of income, were more likely to have a higher rate of grant implementation than nations with higher incomes or more-developed health systems.
The higher rate of grant implementation seen in countries with low income and low health-spending lends support to proponents of major increases in health assistance for the poorest countries and argues that focusing resources on low-income nations, particularly those with political stability, will not create difficulties of absorptive capacity. Our analysis was restricted to grant implementation, which is one part of the issue of absorptive capacity. In the future, assessment of the effect of Global Fund grants on intervention coverage will be vital.
全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金于2002年发起,旨在吸引并迅速拨付资金以抗击这些疾病。然而,一些评论家认为,贫困国家无法有效利用此类资源来增加其卫生项目的实施——这被称为缺乏吸收能力。我们旨在调查发展中国家赠款实施的主要决定因素。
利用全球基金网站上公开的信息,我们进行了随机效应分析,以调查赠款特征、主要受援方和当地基金代理的类型以及国家属性对2003年至2005年期间(全球基金支付的第一阶段)发放的款项的影响。为检验研究结果的稳健性,还测试了替代估计方法和模型规格的回归结果。
赠款特征——如承诺规模、签署与首次支付之间的滞后时间以及融资轮次——对赠款实施有显著影响。政治稳定性增强与赠款的高使用率相关。低收入国家以及在给定收入水平下卫生系统欠发达的国家,比高收入或卫生系统更发达的国家更有可能有更高的赠款实施率。
低收入和低卫生支出国家中较高的赠款实施率支持了大幅增加对最贫穷国家卫生援助的支持者的观点,并表明将资源集中于低收入国家,尤其是那些政治稳定的国家,不会造成吸收能力方面的困难。我们的分析仅限于赠款实施,这只是吸收能力问题的一部分。未来,评估全球基金赠款对干预覆盖范围的影响将至关重要。