Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;96(6):832-7. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301084. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: To evaluate the agreement of parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness among three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments.
Two hundred and three glaucomatous eyes and 88 normal eyes were imaged by Cirrus, RTVue and 3D OCT. The average and the four quadrant RNFL thicknesses were evaluated. Agreement among RNFL measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression analysis. The percentage of each quadrant in the average RNFL thickness value was compared among the three instruments.
Cirrus showed significantly smaller thickness values than RTVue (difference=8.8 μm, p<0.0001) and 3D OCT (difference=8.1 μm, p<0.0001). Although RNFL measurements among the instruments were highly correlated, the Bland-Altman analysis revealed proportional biases for most of the pair-wise agreements. Additionally, 3D OCT showed strong proportional biases with RTVue and 3D OCT. RTVue had a smaller occupied proportion of nasal quadrants (30.2%) and a larger proportion of inferior quadrants (32.4%) compared with Cirrus and 3D OCT.
RNFL measurements among the instruments were well correlated but had different values for thickness. The measurement circle of RTVue might be more superior-temporally located compared with the other instruments. Differences in the measurement protocols might be affected by the disagreements. These instruments should not be used interchangeably.
背景/目的:评估三种频域光相干断层扫描仪(OCT)在视乳头旁视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度测量中的一致性。
共 203 只青光眼眼和 88 只正常眼分别接受 Cirrus、RTVue 和 3D OCT 扫描。评估平均和四个象限的 RNFL 厚度。采用 Bland-Altman 分析和线性回归分析评估 RNFL 测量值之间的一致性。比较三种仪器在平均 RNFL 厚度值中每个象限的比例。
Cirrus 比 RTVue(差异=8.8 μm,p<0.0001)和 3D OCT(差异=8.1 μm,p<0.0001)的厚度值小。尽管三种仪器之间的 RNFL 测量值高度相关,但 Bland-Altman 分析显示大多数两两比较存在比例偏差。此外,3D OCT 与 RTVue 之间存在较强的比例偏差。与 Cirrus 和 3D OCT 相比,RTVue 的鼻侧象限(30.2%)比例较小,下方象限(32.4%)比例较大。
三种仪器之间的 RNFL 测量值相关性良好,但厚度值存在差异。与其他仪器相比,RTVue 的测量圆可能更偏向颞侧。测量方案的差异可能会受到不一致的影响。这些仪器不应互换使用。