Goebell H, Wienbeck M, Schomerus H, Malchow H
Abteilung Gastroenterologie, Medizinische Klinik, Universitäten Essen.
Med Klin (Munich). 1990 Oct 15;85(10):573-6.
In the European Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study a general documentation of clinical and laboratory data was made at the entry into the study in 452 patients. These patients were in different states of their disease from quiescent to very active. In all patients the Crohn's Disease Activity Index of Best (CDAI) and the Dutch Index of van Hees was calculated. Three gastroenterologists did a global clinical rating and a separate laboratory rating without knowledge of the indices. The ratings were then correlated with the indices in the individual patients. The clinical rating correlated well with the CDAI (r = 0.88) and less with the Dutch Index (r = 0.672). On the other hand the laboratory rating showed a better correlation with the Dutch Index (r = 0.742) than with the CDAI (r = 0.573). This demonstrates that the CDAI preferably is an estimate of the clinical severity of the disease and not of the activity of inflammation. Vice versa the Dutch Index is mainly reflecting the activity of the inflammatory process.
在欧洲合作性克罗恩病研究中,对452例患者在进入研究时的临床和实验室数据进行了全面记录。这些患者处于疾病的不同状态,从静止期到非常活跃期。对所有患者计算了最佳克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)和范赫斯荷兰指数。三位胃肠病学家在不知道这些指数的情况下进行了整体临床评分和单独的实验室评分。然后将这些评分与个体患者的指数进行相关性分析。临床评分与CDAI相关性良好(r = 0.88),与荷兰指数的相关性较低(r = 0.672)。另一方面,实验室评分与荷兰指数的相关性(r = 0.742)优于与CDAI的相关性(r = 0.573)。这表明CDAI主要是对疾病临床严重程度的评估,而非炎症活动的评估。反之,荷兰指数主要反映炎症过程的活动情况。