Suppr超能文献

随机对照药物试验中与诺西贝有关的不良事件在纤维肌痛综合征和痛性糖尿病周围神经病变中的系统评价。

Adverse events attributable to nocebo in randomized controlled drug trials in fibromyalgia syndrome and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, Saarbrücken, Germany.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):437-51. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182321ad8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of the study were to determine the impact of nocebo effects on adverse events (AEs) in drug trials in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

METHODS

MEDLINE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and the databases of the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America were searched until December 31, 2010. Randomized controlled trials with a parallel design of any drug therapy compared with pharmacological placebo in patients with FMS and DPN were included. Pooled estimates of nocebo effects (number of patients with at least 1 AE and dropping out due AEs) were calculated for placebo and true drug groups by a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight FMS (62 DPN) trials included a total of 5065 (5095) patients in placebo groups. The quality of reporting the assessment strategy of AEs was poor in most trials. The pooled estimate of the event rate drop out rate due to AEs in placebo groups was 9.6 [95% confidence control (CI): 8.6-10.7] in placebo and 16.3 (95% CI: 14.1-31.2) in true drug groups of FMS trials and was 5.8 (95% CI: 5.1-6.6) in placebo and 13.2 (95% CI: 10.7-16.2) in true drug groups of DPN trials. Nocebo effects accounted for 72.0% (44.9) of the drop outs in true drug groups in FMS (DPN).

DISCUSSION

Nocebo effects substantially accounted for AEs in drug trials of FMS and DPN. Standards to assess and report AEs should be defined by regulatory agencies. Strategies to minimize nocebo effects in both clinical trials and clinical practice should be developed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)和痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的药物试验中,厌恶效应(nocebo effects)对不良事件(AEs)的影响。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、CENTRAL、SCOPUS,以及美国国立卫生研究院和美国制药研究和制造商协会的数据库,检索时间截至 2010 年 12 月 31 日。纳入 FMS 和 DPN 患者中任何药物治疗与药理学安慰剂的平行设计的随机对照试验。采用随机效应模型计算安慰剂和真药组的厌恶效应(至少出现 1 种 AE 并因 AE 而停药的患者人数)的汇总估计值。

结果

58 项 FMS(62 项 DPN)试验共纳入 5065(5095)例安慰剂组患者。大多数试验对 AE 评估策略的报告质量较差。FMS 试验中,安慰剂组因 AEs 导致的事件发生率(脱落率)的汇总估计值为 9.6[95%置信区间(CI):8.6-10.7],真药组为 16.3(95% CI:14.1-31.2);DPN 试验中,安慰剂组为 5.8(95% CI:5.1-6.6),真药组为 13.2(95% CI:10.7-16.2)。厌恶效应在 FMS(DPN)真药组的脱落患者中占 72.0%(44.9%)。

讨论

厌恶效应在 FMS 和 DPN 的药物试验中对 AEs 有很大影响。监管机构应制定评估和报告 AEs 的标准。应制定在临床试验和临床实践中最大限度减少厌恶效应的策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验