Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药在纤维肌痛综合征管理中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The role of antidepressants in the management of fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Center Saarbrcken, Saarbrcken, Germany.

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2012 Apr 1;26(4):297-307. doi: 10.2165/11598970-000000000-00000.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of antidepressants in the management of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) still needs to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide a quantitative analysis (meta-analysis) of the efficacy and harms of antidepressants in the management of adult FMS patients.

DATA SOURCES

The data sources used were the databases MEDLINE, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (until December 30, 2010), the reference lists of included articles, and the websites of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).

STUDY SELECTION

Studies with a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design comparing any types of antidepressants with pharmacological placebo or head-to-head comparisons of different types of antidepressants in FMS patients were included. RCTs in which antidepressants were combined with any other defined treatment or antidepressants were tested against anything but drug placebo were excluded. Patients diagnosed with FMS according to predefined criteria of any age were included. To be included, studies had to assess at least one key domain of FMS (pain, sleep, fatigue, health-related quality of life [HRQOL]) as outcomes of efficacy and report total treatment discontinuation rates and/or dropout rates due to adverse events as outcomes for harms.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted according to protocols of previous systematic reviews on antidepressants in FMS. Methodology quality was assessed by the van Tulder score.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for continuous outcomes by means and standard deviations and relative risks (RR) for 30% pain reduction and total dropout rate for comparisons of antidepressants with placebo. Examination of the combined results was performed by a random effects model. We used Cohen's categories to evaluate the magnitude of the effect size, calculated by SMD. Heterogeneity was tested by the I2 statistic. Thirty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The SMDs of serotonin noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) on pain, sleep, fatigue, depression and HRQOL were significant. Based on Cohen's categories, the effect size on pain was small and the ones on sleep, fatigue, depression and HRQOL were not substantial. 1481/3528 (42.0%) patients with SNRIs and 737/2304 (32.0%) patients with placebo reported a 30% pain reduction (number needed to treat [NNT] 10.0; 95% CI 8.00, 13.4; I2 = 4%). The RR of dropouts due to adverse events was 1.83 (95% CI 1.53, 2.18; I2 = 33%). The SMDs of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on pain, sleep, depression and HRQOL were significant. Based on Cohen's categories, the effect sizes on pain, depression and HRQOL were small and the one on sleep not substantial. 72/198 (36.4%) patients with SSRIs and 40/194 (20.6%) patients with placebo reported a 30% pain reduction (NNT 6.3; 95% CI 4.1, 14.1). The RR of dropouts due to adverse events was 1.60 (95% CI 0.84, 3.04; I2 = 0%). The SMDs of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) on pain, sleep, fatigue and HRQOL were significant. Based on Cohen's categories, the effect sizes on pain and sleep were moderate and the ones on fatigue and HRQOL were small. 140/290 (48.3%) patients with TCAs and 70/252 (27.8%) patients with placebo reported a 30% pain reduction (NNT 4.9; 95% CI 3.5, 8.0). The RR of dropouts due to adverse events was 0.84 (95% CI 0.46, 1.52; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The TCA amitriptyline and the SNRIs duloxetine and milnacipran are first-line options for the treatment of FMS patients. Physicians and patients should be realistic about the potential benefits of antidepressants in FMS. A small number of patients experience a substantial symptom relief with no or minor adverse effects. However, a remarkable number of patients dropout of therapy because of intolerable adverse effects or experience only a small relief of symptoms, which does not outweigh the adverse effects.

摘要

背景

抗抑郁药在纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)治疗中的作用仍需确定。

目的

本研究的目的是对成人 FMS 患者使用抗抑郁药的疗效和安全性进行定量分析(荟萃分析)。

资料来源

使用的资料来源为 MEDLINE、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(截至 2010 年 12 月 30 日)、纳入文献的参考文献列表以及美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和美国制药研究和制造商协会(PhRMA)的网站。

研究选择

纳入的研究为随机对照试验(RCT)设计,比较任何类型的抗抑郁药与药理学安慰剂或 FMS 患者中不同类型的抗抑郁药的头对头比较。抗抑郁药与任何其他特定治疗联合或抗抑郁药与非药物安慰剂对照的 RCT 被排除在外。根据任何年龄的纤维肌痛综合征的既定标准诊断为纤维肌痛综合征的患者被纳入。为了被纳入,研究必须评估至少一个纤维肌痛综合征的关键领域(疼痛、睡眠、疲劳、健康相关生活质量[HRQOL])作为疗效的结果,并报告由于不良反应而导致的总治疗停药率和/或失访率。

数据提取

根据之前关于纤维肌痛综合征中抗抑郁药的系统评价方案提取数据。采用 van Tulder 评分法评估方法学质量。

数据综合

通过平均值和标准差计算连续结果的标准化均数差(SMD),并比较抗抑郁药与安慰剂对 30%疼痛缓解和总失访率的相对风险(RR)。采用随机效应模型进行综合结果的检查。我们使用 Cohen 的类别来评估 SMD 计算的效应大小的大小。通过 I2 统计检验异质性。35 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素(去甲肾上腺素)再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)在疼痛、睡眠、疲劳、抑郁和 HRQOL 方面的 SMD 具有统计学意义。根据 Cohen 的类别,疼痛的效应大小较小,睡眠、疲劳、抑郁和 HRQOL 的效应大小不显著。使用 SNRIs 的 1481/3528(42.0%)例患者和使用安慰剂的 737/2304(32.0%)例患者报告 30%疼痛缓解(需要治疗数[NNT]10.0;95%CI 8.00,13.4;I2=4%)。由于不良反应而导致的脱落率的 RR 为 1.83(95%CI 1.53,2.18;I2=33%)。选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)在疼痛、睡眠、抑郁和 HRQOL 方面的 SMD 具有统计学意义。根据 Cohen 的类别,疼痛、抑郁和 HRQOL 的效应大小较小,睡眠的效应大小不显著。使用 SSRIs 的 72/198(36.4%)例患者和使用安慰剂的 40/194(20.6%)例患者报告 30%疼痛缓解(NNT 6.3;95%CI 4.1,14.1)。由于不良反应而导致的脱落率的 RR 为 1.60(95%CI 0.84,3.04;I2=0%)。三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)在疼痛、睡眠、疲劳和 HRQOL 方面的 SMD 具有统计学意义。根据 Cohen 的类别,疼痛和睡眠的效应大小为中度,疲劳和 HRQOL 的效应大小为较小。使用 TCAs 的 140/290(48.3%)例患者和使用安慰剂的 70/252(27.8%)例患者报告 30%疼痛缓解(NNT 4.9;95%CI 3.5,8.0)。由于不良反应而导致的脱落率的 RR 为 0.84(95%CI 0.46,1.52;I2=0%)。

结论

三环类抗抑郁药阿米替林和 5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂度洛西汀和米那普仑是纤维肌痛综合征患者的一线治疗选择。医生和患者应该对抗抑郁药在纤维肌痛综合征中的潜在益处持现实态度。少数患者出现症状显著缓解,无或仅有轻微不良反应。然而,相当数量的患者因无法耐受不良反应或仅出现轻微缓解而停止治疗,不良反应的影响超过了治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验